Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, P.O. Box 50, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21108. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78235-z.
Aim of this study was to assess the US findings of patients with late-stage hip OA undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to associate the US findings with conventional radiography (CR) and intraoperative findings. Moreover, the inter-rater reliability of hip US, and association between the US and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were evaluated. Sixty-eight hips were included, and intraoperative findings were available on 48 hips. Mean patient age was 67.6 years and 38% were males. OA findings-osteophytes at femoral collum and anterosuperior acetabulum, femoral head deformity and effusion-were assessed on US, CR and THA. The diagnostic performance of US and CR was compared by applying the THA findings as the gold standard. Osteoarthritic US findings were very common, but no association between the US findings and OHS was observed. The pooled inter-rater reliability (n = 65) varied from moderate to excellent (k = 0.538-0.815). When THA findings were used as the gold standard, US detected femoral collum osteophytes with 95% sensitivity, 0% specificity, 81% accuracy, and 85% positive predictive value. Concerning acetabular osteophytes, the respective values were 96%, 0%, 88% and 91%. For the femoral head deformity, they were 92%, 36%, 38% and 83%, and for the effusion 49%, 85%, 58% and 90%, respectively. US provides similar detection of osteophytes as does CR. On femoral head deformity, performance of the US is superior to CR. The inter-rater reliability of the US evaluation varies from moderate to excellent, and no association between US and OHS was observed in this patient cohort.
本研究旨在评估接受全髋关节置换术 (THA) 的晚期髋骨关节炎患者的美国超声检查结果,并将这些结果与常规放射学 (CR) 和术中结果相关联。此外,还评估了髋关节超声的观察者间可靠性以及超声与牛津髋关节评分 (OHS) 之间的相关性。共纳入 68 髋,其中 48 髋可获得术中结果。患者平均年龄为 67.6 岁,38%为男性。在 US、CR 和 THA 上评估了股骨颈和前上髋臼的骨赘、股骨头畸形和关节积液等 OA 发现。将 THA 结果作为金标准,比较了 US 和 CR 的诊断性能。US 的骨关节炎发现非常常见,但未观察到 US 发现与 OHS 之间存在相关性。(n=65)的汇总观察者间可靠性从中度到极好(k=0.538-0.815)。当使用 THA 结果作为金标准时,US 检测股骨颈骨赘的灵敏度为 95%,特异性为 0%,准确性为 81%,阳性预测值为 85%。对于髋臼骨赘,相应的值分别为 96%、0%、88%和 91%。对于股骨头畸形,它们分别为 92%、36%、38%和 83%,对于关节积液,它们分别为 49%、85%、58%和 90%。US 提供与 CR 相似的骨赘检测。在股骨头畸形方面,US 的性能优于 CR。US 评估的观察者间可靠性从中度到极好,并且在该患者队列中未观察到 US 与 OHS 之间存在相关性。