Suppr超能文献

美国的种族主义与植物神经生物学之父贾格迪什·钱德拉·鲍斯爵士的失落遗产。

American racism and the lost legacy of Sir Jagadis Chandra Bose, the father of plant neurobiology.

机构信息

Department of Natural Sciences, Mercy College , Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA.

出版信息

Plant Signal Behav. 2021 Jan 2;16(1):1818030. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1818030. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Abstract

Sir Jagadis Chandra Bose, India's first modern biologist departed boldly from mainstream botany by claiming that plants possess "nerves" and "pulsating cells" that function respectively much like the nerve and heart cells of animals. These ideas were based on highly sensitive measurements he made of various plant functions by means of assorted ingenious instruments of his own design. Despite being the most internationally celebrated plant biologist of the early 20 century, by the end of his life, Bose had become a scientific pariah whose work was expunged from Western histories of plant biology for nearly a century. In the 21 century, Bose's contributions to biology have begun to be appreciated anew, particularly within the plant neurobiology community. The present contribution examines the motivating factors behind the anti-Bose camp in the United States in the 1920s. It is concluded that the opposition to Bose's ideas during this period had less to do with scientific dialectics than with jealousy over Bose's international acclaim and the prevailing racism of the era.

摘要

印度第一位现代生物学家贾格迪什·钱德拉·鲍斯爵士大胆地背离主流植物学,声称植物拥有“神经”和“搏动细胞”,它们分别与动物的神经和心脏细胞功能相似。这些观点基于他通过自己设计的各种巧妙仪器对各种植物功能进行的高度敏感测量。尽管他是 20 世纪初最受国际赞誉的植物生物学家,但在他生命的尽头,鲍斯已经成为科学界的弃儿,他的作品几乎被西方植物生物学史抹去了近一个世纪。在 21 世纪,鲍斯对生物学的贡献开始重新受到赞赏,特别是在植物神经生物学领域。本贡献考察了 20 世纪 20 年代美国反鲍斯阵营的动机因素。得出的结论是,这一时期反对鲍斯观点的原因与其说是科学辩证法,不如说是对鲍斯国际声誉的嫉妒以及当时盛行的种族主义。

相似文献

2
Jagdish Chandra Bose & plant neurobiology.贾格迪什·钱德拉·鲍斯与植物神经生物学。
Indian J Med Res. 2019 May;149(5):593-599. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_392_19.
4
A tribute to Sir Jagadish Chandra Bose (1858-1937).向贾格迪什·钱德拉·博斯爵士(1858 - 1937)致敬。
Photosynth Res. 2007 Jan;91(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11120-006-9084-6. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
9
The "plant neurobiology" revolution.植物神经生物学革命。
Plant Signal Behav. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2345413. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2345413. Epub 2024 May 6.
10
Plant "intelligence" and the misuse of historical sources as evidence.植物“智能”与将历史资料误用作证据
Protoplasma. 2025 Mar;262(2):223-246. doi: 10.1007/s00709-024-01988-1. Epub 2024 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding otherness-the anthropocentrism trap.理解他者——人类中心主义陷阱。
Protoplasma. 2025 Mar;262(2):219-221. doi: 10.1007/s00709-025-02043-3. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Matthew 7:3-a response to Kingsland and Taiz (2024).马太福音7:3——对金斯兰和泰兹(2024年)的回应。
Protoplasma. 2025 Mar;262(2):267-275. doi: 10.1007/s00709-024-02002-4. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Plant "intelligence" and the misuse of historical sources as evidence.植物“智能”与将历史资料误用作证据
Protoplasma. 2025 Mar;262(2):223-246. doi: 10.1007/s00709-024-01988-1. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
4
The "plant neurobiology" revolution.植物神经生物学革命。
Plant Signal Behav. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):2345413. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2345413. Epub 2024 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Plants Neither Possess nor Require Consciousness.植物既没有意识也不需要意识。
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Aug;24(8):677-687. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
Identification of a plant receptor for extracellular ATP.鉴定细胞外 ATP 的植物受体。
Science. 2014 Jan 17;343(6168):290-4. doi: 10.1126/science.343.6168.290.
8
Mimosa pudica, Dionaea muscipula and anesthetics.含羞草、捕蝇草和麻醉剂。
Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Sep 1;7(9):1163-7. doi: 10.4161/psb.21000. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
Plant and Animal Response : Occasional Lecture.植物与动物的反应:不定期讲座。
Proc R Soc Med. 1920;13(Gen Rep):101-28. doi: 10.1177/003591572001300505.
10
The Action of Drugs on Plants.
Proc R Soc Med. 1915;8(Gen Rep):1-40. doi: 10.1177/003591571500800501.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验