I-Ching Chuang, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, and Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wen-Chuin Hsu, MD, MPH, MS, is Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, and Chair, Dementia Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Nov/Dec;74(6):7406205050p1-7406205050p8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.039354.
Identifying cognitive or physical limitations that contribute to difficulties in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) is critical for adequate intervention with community-dwelling older adults with cognitive decline.
To establish the validity and responsiveness of an IADL scale based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (the ICF-IADL) with respect to both cognitive and physical limitations.
Cross-sectional study.
Multiple community care and senior centers.
Eighty-two older adults.
Combination of physical exercise and cognitive training.
Five criterion measures-Lawton IADL Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSS), Word Lists Test (WLT), and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG).
The ICF-IADL's three summary scales-Disability Index (DI), Cognitive Disability Index (CDI), and Physical Disability Index (PDI)-had good concurrent validity with the Lawton IADL Scale. The DI and CDI had moderate to good associations with the MoCA. The DI's and CDI's predictive validity for scores on the Lawton IADL Scale, MoCA, and TUG was moderate to good and that of the PDI was fair. Responsiveness was large for the DI, moderate for the CDI, and small for the PDI.
The ICF-IADL can be used to measure disability in IADLs related to cognitive and physical limitations. The DI and CDI were better than the PDI in predicting outcomes in general cognitive function and dynamic balance and were more responsive to change after intervention than the PDI.
The ICF-IADL addresses both cognitive and physical limitations and can be a valid assessment of IADLs. Occupational therapists can use it to determine difficulties in IADLs and causes of those difficulties, guide treatment planning, and monitor intervention effectiveness with community-dwelling older adults with cognitive decline.
识别导致工具性日常生活活动(IADLs)困难的认知或身体限制,对于有认知能力下降的社区居住的老年人进行适当干预至关重要。
建立基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的 IADL 量表的有效性和反应性,该量表涉及认知和身体限制。
横断面研究。
多个社区护理和高级中心。
82 名老年人。
物理锻炼和认知训练相结合。
五项标准措施-劳顿 IADL 量表、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、数字符号替代测试(DSS)、单词列表测试(WLT)和计时起立行走测试(TUG)。
ICF-IADL 的三个总结量表-残疾指数(DI)、认知残疾指数(CDI)和身体残疾指数(PDI)-与劳顿 IADL 量表具有良好的同时效度。DI 和 CDI 与 MoCA 有中度至良好的相关性。DI 和 CDI 对劳顿 IADL 量表、MoCA 和 TUG 评分的预测效度为中度至良好,PDI 的预测效度为适度。DI 的反应性较大,CDI 的反应性为中等,PDI 的反应性较小。
ICF-IADL 可用于测量与认知和身体限制相关的 IADL 中的残疾。在预测一般认知功能和动态平衡方面,DI 和 CDI 优于 PDI,干预后反应性优于 PDI。
ICF-IADL 同时涉及认知和身体限制,可以作为 IADL 的有效评估。职业治疗师可以使用它来确定认知能力下降的社区居住老年人在 IADLs 中遇到的困难及其困难的原因,指导治疗计划,并监测干预效果。