University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Ave., Mail Stop 1091, Toledo, OH 43614, United States of America.
Weill Cornell Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 505 East 70th Street, Room HT-580, New York, NY 10065, United States of America.
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):485-491. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
To evaluate representation trends of historically underrepresented minority (URM) groups in gynecologic oncology fellowships in the United States using a nationwide database collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).
Data on self-reported ethnicity/race of filled residency positions was collected from ACGME Database Books across three academic years from 2016 to 2019. Primary chi-square analysis compared URM representation in gynecologic oncology to obstetrics and gynecology, other surgical specialties, and other medical specialties. Secondary analysis examined representation of two URM subgroups: 1) Asian/Pacific Islander, and 2) Hispanic, Black, Native American, Other (HBNO), across specialty groups.
A total of 528 gynecologic oncology positions, 12,559 obstetrics and gynecology positions, 52,733 other surgical positions, and 240,690 other medical positions from ACGME accredited medical specialties were included in analysis. Primary comparative analysis showed a statistically significant lower proportion (P < 0.05) of URM trainees in gynecologic oncology in comparison to each of obstetrics and gynecology, other surgical fields, and other medical fields. Secondary analysis also demonstrated a significantly lower proportion (P < 0.05) of HBNO physicians in gynecologic oncology in comparison to obstetrics and gynecology, as well as all other medical and surgical specialties.
This study illustrates the disparities in URM representation, especially those who identify as HBNO, in gynecologic oncology fellowship training in comparison to obstetrics and gynecology as well as other medical and surgical fields. Improvements to the current recruitment and selection practices in gynecologic oncology fellowships in the United States are necessary in order to ensure a diverse and representative workforce.
使用美国研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)收集的全国性数据库,评估历史上代表性不足的少数族裔(URM)群体在美国妇科肿瘤学研究员中的代表性趋势。
从 2016 年至 2019 年的三个学术年度的 ACGME 数据库书籍中收集了关于已填补住院医师职位的自我报告族裔/种族数据。主要的卡方分析比较了妇科肿瘤学中 URM 的代表性与妇产科、其他外科专业和其他医学专业。二次分析检查了两个 URM 亚组的代表性:1)亚洲/太平洋岛民,和 2)西班牙裔、黑人、美国原住民、其他(HBNO),跨专业组。
共纳入来自 ACGME 认证医学专业的 528 个妇科肿瘤学职位、12559 个妇产科职位、52733 个其他外科职位和 240690 个其他医学职位进行分析。主要的比较分析显示,妇科肿瘤学中的 URM 受训者比例明显低于妇产科、其他外科领域和其他医学领域(P<0.05)。二次分析还表明,与妇产科相比,妇科肿瘤学中 HBNO 医生的比例明显较低(P<0.05),以及所有其他医学和外科专业。
本研究表明,与妇产科以及其他医学和外科领域相比,URM 的代表性差异,特别是那些自认为 HBNO 的人,在妇科肿瘤学研究员培训中存在差异。为了确保多元化和代表性的劳动力,有必要改进美国妇科肿瘤学研究员的当前招聘和选拔实践。