• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估共用呼吸机上的交叉污染。

Evaluating cross contamination on a shared ventilator.

机构信息

Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, SUNY Downstate and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA

Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2021 Mar;38(3):220-223. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209972. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-209972
PMID:33277345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disasters have the potential to cause critical shortages of life-saving equipment. It has been postulated that during patient surge, multiple individuals could be maintained on a single ventilator. This was supported by a previous trial that showed one ventilator could support four sheep. The goal of our study is to investigate if cross contamination of pathological agents occurs between individuals on a shared ventilator with strategically placed antimicrobial filters.

METHODS

A multipatient ventilator circuit was assembled using four sterile, parallel standard tubing circuits attached to four 2 L anaesthesia bags, each representing a simulated patient. Each 'patient' was attached to a Heat and Moisture Exchange filter. An additional bacterial/viral filter was attached to each expiratory limb. 'Patient-Lung' number 1 was inoculated with an isolate of and the circuit was run for 24 hours. Each 'lung' and three points in the expiratory limb tubing were washed with broth and cultured. All cultures were incubated for 48 hours with subcultures performed at 24 hours.

RESULTS

Washed cultures of patient 2, 3 and 4 failed to demonstrate growth of . Cultures of the distal expiratory tubing, expiratory limb connector and expiratory limb prefilter tubing yielded no growth of at 24 or 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

Based on this circuit configuration, it is plausible to maintain four individuals on a single ventilator for 24 hours without fear of cross contamination.

摘要

背景

灾难有可能导致救生设备严重短缺。有人推测,在患者激增期间,一台呼吸机可以同时维持多名患者的生命。这一假设得到了之前一项试验的支持,该试验表明一台呼吸机可以支持四只绵羊。我们的研究目的是调查在共享呼吸机上放置策略性位置的抗菌过滤器时,个体之间是否会发生病理剂的交叉污染。

方法

使用四个无菌、平行的标准管腔回路连接到四个 2 升麻醉袋,每个代表一个模拟患者,组装了多患者呼吸机回路。每个“患者”都连接到一个热湿交换过滤器。每个呼气肢上都附加了一个细菌/病毒过滤器。“患者-肺”1 号被接种了一株 ,并运行了 24 小时。用肉汤冲洗每个“肺”和呼气肢管腔的三个点,并进行培养。所有培养物在 48 小时内孵育,在 24 小时进行传代培养。

结果

患者 2、3 和 4 的洗涤培养物未能显示 的生长。在 24 或 48 小时时,远端呼气管腔、呼气肢连接器和呼气肢预过滤器管腔的培养物均未生长 。

结论

根据这种回路配置,可以在不担心交叉污染的情况下,在一台呼吸机上维持四名患者 24 小时。

相似文献

1
Evaluating cross contamination on a shared ventilator.评估共用呼吸机上的交叉污染。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Mar;38(3):220-223. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209972. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
2
Re-Evaluating Cross-Contamination: Additional Trials on Co-Ventilation.重新评估交叉污染:共同通风的附加试验。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;66(4):e477-e482. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
Impact of humidification and nebulization during expiratory limb protection: an experimental bench study.呼气末肢体保护时湿化和雾化的影响:一项实验性台架研究。
Respir Care. 2013 Aug;58(8):1315-22. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01785. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Bacterial contamination and frequency of changing ventilator circuitry.
J Hosp Infect. 1990 Jan;15(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90022-g.
5
Humidification method that decreases condensate contamination in ventilator tubing.减少呼吸机管路中冷凝水污染的加湿方法。
Heart Lung. 2000 Jan-Feb;29(1):56-9. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(00)90038-4.
6
An evaluation of the microbial retention performance of three ventilator-circuit filters.三种呼吸机回路过滤器的微生物截留性能评估。
Intensive Care Med. 1994;20(3):233-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01704708.
7
A single ventilator for multiple simulated patients to meet disaster surge.一台用于多名模拟患者的呼吸机,以应对灾难高峰期需求。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;13(11):1246-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
8
A prospective, randomized comparison of an in-line heat moisture exchange filter and heated wire humidifiers: rates of ventilator-associated early-onset (community-acquired) or late-onset (hospital-acquired) pneumonia and incidence of endotracheal tube occlusion.在线热湿交换过滤器与加热丝加湿器的前瞻性随机对照研究:呼吸机相关性早发性(社区获得性)或迟发性(医院获得性)肺炎的发生率及气管插管堵塞的发生率
Chest. 1997 Oct;112(4):1055-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.4.1055.
9
Bacterial contamination and the effect of filters in anaesthetic circuits in a simulated patient model.
J Hosp Infect. 1992 May;21(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90153-d.
10
Mechanical ventilation of SARS patients. Safety issues involving breathing-circuit filters.严重急性呼吸综合征患者的机械通气。涉及呼吸回路过滤器的安全问题。
Health Devices. 2003 Jun;32(6):220-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of a mechanical ventilator-sharing system.一种机械通气设备共享系统的开发与评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 16;11:1356769. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1356769. eCollection 2024.
2
Sharing Mechanical Ventilator: In Vitro Evaluation of Circuit Cross-Flows and Patient Interactions.共享机械通气机:回路交叉流与患者相互作用的体外评估
Membranes (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;11(7):547. doi: 10.3390/membranes11070547.
3
Scoring System to Evaluate the Performance of ICU Ventilators in the Pandemic of COVID-19: A Lung Model Study.
评估ICU呼吸机在新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行中性能的评分系统:一项肺模型研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 14;8:663608. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.663608. eCollection 2021.