• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在健康和实验性黏膜炎条件下,氧化锆和钛牙科种植体的软组织形态的临床和组织学比较——一项随机对照临床试验。

Clinical and histological comparison of the soft tissue morphology between zirconia and titanium dental implants under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions-A randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2021 May;48(5):721-733. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13411. Epub 2021 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13411
PMID:33278048
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the soft tissue morphology under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions comparing zirconia and titanium implants.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with two adjacent missing teeth received one zirconia (Zr) and one titanium (Ti) implant, with the mesial and distal position randomized. At 3 months, half of the patients were instructed to continue (healthy; h) and the other half to omit (experimental mucositis; m) oral hygiene around the implants for 3 weeks. Clinical parameters were evaluated before and after the experimental phase, and a soft tissue biopsy was harvested. Mixed model analyses were performed to analyse the data.

RESULTS

The plaque control record increased significantly for the two mucositis groups, reaching 68.3 ± 31.9% (mean ± SD) for Zr-m and 75.0 ± 29.4% for Ti-m (p < .0001), being also significantly lower for Zr-m than for Ti-m. Bleeding on probing remained stable in group Zr-m and amounted to 21.7 ± 23.6%, but increased significantly in group Ti-m (p = .040), measuring 32.5 ± 27.8%. The number of inflammatory cells and the length of the junctional epithelium did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Both implants rendered similar outcomes under healthy conditions. Lower plaque and bleeding scores were detected for zirconia implants under experimental mucositis conditions. Histologically, only minimal differences were observed.

摘要

目的

分析健康和实验性黏膜炎条件下氧化锆和钛种植体的软组织形态。

方法

42 名有两颗相邻缺失牙的患者接受了一颗氧化锆(Zr)和一颗钛(Ti)种植体,近中和远中位置随机。3 个月时,一半患者被指示继续(健康;h),另一半患者被指示在 3 周内停止(实验性黏膜炎;m)对种植体周围的口腔卫生。在实验阶段前后评估临床参数,并采集软组织活检。采用混合模型分析进行数据分析。

结果

两组黏膜炎患者的菌斑控制记录均显著增加,Zr-m 组达到 68.3±31.9%(平均值±标准差),Ti-m 组达到 75.0±29.4%(p<0.0001),Zr-m 组明显低于 Ti-m 组。Zr-m 组的探诊出血仍保持稳定,为 21.7±23.6%,但 Ti-m 组显著增加(p=0.040),为 32.5±27.8%。两组间炎症细胞数量和结合上皮长度无显著差异。

结论

两种种植体在健康条件下均具有相似的结果。在实验性黏膜炎条件下,氧化锆种植体的菌斑和出血评分较低。组织学上观察到的差异很小。

相似文献

1
Clinical and histological comparison of the soft tissue morphology between zirconia and titanium dental implants under healthy and experimental mucositis conditions-A randomized controlled clinical trial.在健康和实验性黏膜炎条件下,氧化锆和钛牙科种植体的软组织形态的临床和组织学比较——一项随机对照临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 May;48(5):721-733. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13411. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
2
Clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes of zirconia and titanium implants in the posterior zone after 1 year of loading-A randomized controlled trial.种植体在负荷 1 年后在后牙区的临床、影像学和患者报告结局:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Nov;35(11):1428-1439. doi: 10.1111/clr.14329. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Experimental peri-implant mucositis around titanium and zirconia implants in comparison to a natural tooth: part 2-clinical and microbiological parameters.实验性种植体周围黏膜炎在钛和氧化锆种植体与天然牙周围的对比:第 2 部分——临床和微生物参数。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;48(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Experimental peri-implant mucositis around titanium and zirconia implants in comparison to a natural tooth: part 1-host-derived immunological parameters.实验性种植体周围黏膜炎在钛和氧化锆种植体与天然牙周围的比较:第 1 部分-宿主来源的免疫参数。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;48(4):554-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Differences in Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, Zirconia Implants Treatment Outcomes: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.钛、钛锆、氧化锆种植体治疗效果的差异:一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2023 Sep 30;14(3):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14301. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
6
Quantification of titanium and zirconium elements in oral mucosa around healthy dental implants: a case-control pilot study.健康种植体周围口腔黏膜中钛和锆元素的定量研究:一项病例对照初步研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4715-4726. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05099-8. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
7
The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft peri-implant tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氧化锆或钛作为基台材料对种植体周围软组织的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 11:139-47. doi: 10.1111/clr.12631. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
8
Soft and Hard Tissue Response to Zirconia versus Titanium One-Piece Implants Placed in Alveolar and Palatal Sites: A Randomized Control Trial.氧化锆与钛一体式种植体植入牙槽和腭部位置后的软硬组织反应:一项随机对照试验
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jun;17(3):483-96. doi: 10.1111/cid.12159. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
9
Clinical Performance Comparing Titanium and Titanium-Zirconium or Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.钛及钛锆或氧化锆牙科种植体的临床性能比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 12;10(5):83. doi: 10.3390/dj10050083.
10
Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment.负载定制氧化锆和钛植入物显示出相似的骨整合:一项动物实验。
J Periodontol. 2004 Sep;75(9):1262-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1262.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Assessment of the Relationship of Dental Implant Materials (Titanium and Zirconia) and Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review.牙种植体材料(钛和氧化锆)与种植体周围炎关系的临床评估:一项系统评价
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Aug;24(4):1010-1028. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02409-9. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Peri-implant bone behavior after single drilling technique versus undersized drilling technique of immediately loaded implant in posterior maxilla: a one-year prospective study.上颌后牙区即刻负重种植体单钻孔技术与小直径钻孔技术后种植体周围骨组织的行为:一项为期一年的前瞻性研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 21;25(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06360-0.
3
Enhanced Osteoconductivity of Zirconia Implants with One-Step Femtosecond Laser Treatment Through Morphological and Chemical Modifications.
通过形态学和化学修饰的一步飞秒激光处理增强氧化锆种植体的骨传导性
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 15;16(4):142. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040142.
4
Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in Contact with Zirconium/Titanium Abutments from Histological and Biological Perspectives: A Concise Review.从组织学和生物学角度看与锆/钛基台接触的种植体周围软组织:简要综述
Cells. 2025 Jan 17;14(2):129. doi: 10.3390/cells14020129.
5
One-Piece Monolithic Zirconia Single Tooth Implant-Supported Restorations in the Posterior Region: A 1-Year Prospective Case Series Study.后牙区一体式整体氧化锆单颗种植体支持式修复体:一项为期1年的前瞻性病例系列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Apr;36(4):460-470. doi: 10.1111/clr.14396. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
6
Comparative Clinical Behavior of Zirconia versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.氧化锆与钛牙种植体的比较临床行为:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 31;13(15):4488. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154488.
7
Zirconia Hybrid Dental Implants Influence the Biological Properties of Neural Crest-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.氧化锆混合牙种植体对神经嵴来源的间充质基质细胞生物学特性的影响。
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024 Feb 20;14(5):392. doi: 10.3390/nano14050392.
8
Differences in Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, Zirconia Implants Treatment Outcomes: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.钛、钛锆、氧化锆种植体治疗效果的差异:一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2023 Sep 30;14(3):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14301. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
9
Clinical performance of zirconium implants compared to titanium implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氧化锆种植体与钛种植体的临床性能比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 17;11:e15010. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15010. eCollection 2023.
10
Failure Load and Fatigue Behavior of Monolithic and Bi-Layer Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Bonded to One-Piece Zirconia Implants.粘结于一体式氧化锆种植体的整体式和双层氧化锆固定义齿的破坏载荷与疲劳行为
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;15(23):8465. doi: 10.3390/ma15238465.