Ma Christopher, Jeyarajah Jenny, Guizzetti Leonardo, Parker Claire E, Singh Siddharth, Dulai Parambir S, D'Haens Geert R, Sandborn William J, Feagan Brian G, Jairath Vipul
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alimentiv (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc), London, Ontario, Canada.
Alimentiv (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc), London, Ontario, Canada.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):447-454.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.040. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic improvement is an important treatment target for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). However, early endoscopic evaluation is not always feasible. We aimed to develop a clinical decision support tool to discriminate patients who have achieved endoscopic improvement from those with more severe inflammation following mesalamine induction therapy.
We performed a post-hoc analysis of data from a phase 3 non-inferiority trial of 726 adults with mild-to-moderate UC treated with mesalamine. Multivariable logistic regression modeling determined associations between candidate variables and endoscopic improvement (Mayo endoscopic subscore=0-1 according to blinded central reading) at Week 8. Internal model validation was performed using bootstrap resampling. A clinical decision support tool was developed to stratify patients into low, intermediate, and high probability groups for endoscopic improvement.
Variables associated with endoscopic improvement at Week 8 included 50% reduction in fecal calprotectin from baseline (odds ratio [OR] 2.64, 95% CI:, 1.81, 3.85), reduction in rectal bleeding (OR 1.79 per point reduction, 95% CI: 1.35, 2.39), and improvement in physician global assessment (OR 2.32 per point improvement, 95% CI: 1.88, 2.85). The baseline Geboes score (OR 0.74 per grade, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.85) and prolonged disease duration (OR 0.95 per year, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.98) were negatively associated with endoscopic improvement. This model strongly discriminated endoscopic improvement in the development dataset (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.87) and during validation (AUC 0.83).
We developed and validated a clinical decision support tool that has good discriminative performance for induction of endoscopic improvement in patients with mild-to-moderate UC treated with mesalamine. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT01903252.
内镜改善是轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的重要治疗目标。然而,早期内镜评估并非总是可行的。我们旨在开发一种临床决策支持工具,以区分美沙拉嗪诱导治疗后内镜已改善的患者与炎症更严重的患者。
我们对一项3期非劣效性试验的数据进行了事后分析,该试验纳入了726例接受美沙拉嗪治疗的轻至中度UC成人患者。多变量逻辑回归模型确定了候选变量与第8周时内镜改善(根据盲法中心阅片,梅奥内镜亚评分为0 - 1)之间的关联。使用自助重采样进行内部模型验证。开发了一种临床决策支持工具,将患者分为内镜改善的低、中、高概率组。
与第8周内镜改善相关的变量包括粪便钙卫蛋白较基线降低50%(比值比[OR] 2.64,95%置信区间:1.81,3.85)、直肠出血减少(每降低1分OR 1.79,95%置信区间:1.35,2.39)以及医生整体评估改善(每改善1分OR 2.32,95%置信区间:1.88,2.85)。基线Geboes评分(每增加1级OR 0.74,95%置信区间:0.65,0.85)和病程延长(每年OR 0.95,95%置信区间:0.92,0.98)与内镜改善呈负相关。该模型在开发数据集(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.84,95%置信区间:0.81,0.87)和验证期间(AUC 0.83)对内镜改善有很强的区分能力。
我们开发并验证了一种临床决策支持工具,该工具对于接受美沙拉嗪治疗的轻至中度UC患者内镜改善的诱导具有良好的区分性能。ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT01903252。