• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气候变化与土地利用变化——在森林草原交错带,哪个对生态系统服务的影响更大?

Climate change versus land-use change-What affects the ecosystem services more in the forest-steppe ecotone?

机构信息

Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium; Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

College of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, West University Road 235, Hohhot 010021, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 10;759:143525. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143525. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143525
PMID:33280878
Abstract

The Ecosystem services (ESs), which play an important role in the balance of the natural ecosystem and social-economic development, are suffering from degradation caused by human activities and climate change. However, the manner in which the ESs respond to the land use/cover changes (LUCCs) and the climatic factors respectively remain elusive, especially in the forest-steppe ecotone, which is highly sensitive to climate change and anthroponotic activities. Based on the remote sensing data and in situ meteorological data, we comprehensively modeled and compared 4 key ESs changes caused by 3 LUCC types, land-use change fraction, and climate changes through two simple comparative experiments. Our results showed that: the Grain for the Green Project improved the mean soil conservation, carbon sequestration, and water yield but reduced the sand fixation. The cropland expansion had a positive influence on the water yield and sand fixation, but it induced a decline in soil conservation and carbon sequestration. The urbanization very likely increased the water yield and decreased soil conservation, carbon sequestration, and sand fixation. The unequal change fractions of the same land-use conversion may affect the ESs differently. The ESs changes have different responses to climate change in different landscapes due to the ecological process. The water yield could be well explained by the temperature, precipitation, radiation, and wind speed. Climate change had a stronger effect on the water yield and carbon sequestration than the land use/cover changes but sand fixation and soil conservation were more likely to be affected by LUCCs. The impact of three types of land-use changes and climate change on the ecosystem services should be considered when formulating land-use policies. This paper might aid the decision-makers in achieving ESs sustainable management and develop land-use strategies in the forest-steppe ecotone.

摘要

生态系统服务(Ecosystem services,ESs)在自然生态系统平衡和社会经济发展中发挥着重要作用,但正受到人类活动和气候变化导致的退化的影响。然而,ESs 分别对土地利用/覆被变化(Land use/cover changes,LUCCs)和气候因素的响应方式仍不清楚,特别是在对气候变化和人为活动高度敏感的森林-草原交错带。本研究基于遥感数据和现场气象数据,通过两个简单的对比实验,综合模拟和比较了 3 种 LUCC 类型(退耕还林还草工程、耕地扩张和城市化)和 2 种气候因子(气温、降水)变化引起的 4 种关键生态系统服务(土壤保持、固碳、水源涵养和防风固沙)变化。结果表明:退耕还林还草工程提高了平均土壤保持、固碳和水源涵养能力,但降低了防风固沙能力;耕地扩张对水源涵养和防风固沙具有积极影响,但导致土壤保持和固碳能力下降;城市化很可能增加了水源涵养能力,减少了土壤保持、固碳和防风固沙能力;相同土地利用转换的不等变化比例可能会对生态系统服务产生不同的影响;由于生态过程的不同,不同景观下的生态系统服务变化对气候变化的响应不同;水产量可以很好地用温度、降水、辐射和风速来解释;气候变化对水产量和固碳的影响大于土地利用/覆被变化,但防风固沙和土壤保持更可能受到 LUCCs 的影响;在制定土地利用政策时,应考虑三种土地利用变化类型和气候变化对生态系统服务的影响。本文可为决策者实现生态系统服务可持续管理和制定森林-草原交错带土地利用战略提供参考。

相似文献

1
Climate change versus land-use change-What affects the ecosystem services more in the forest-steppe ecotone?气候变化与土地利用变化——在森林草原交错带,哪个对生态系统服务的影响更大?
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 10;759:143525. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143525. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
[Impacts of Land Use and Climate Change on Ecosystem Services in Agro-pastoral Ecotone].[土地利用和气候变化对农牧交错带生态系统服务的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Sep 8;44(9):5114-5124. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202210002.
3
[Spatiotemporal Evolution and Quantitative Attribution Analysis of Vegetation NDVI in Greater Khingan Mountains Forest-Steppe Ecotone].大兴安岭森林-草原交错带植被归一化植被指数时空演变及定量归因分析
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jan 8;45(1):248-261. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202211190.
4
Spatio-temporal and cumulative effects of land use-land cover and climate change on two ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes.土地利用-土地覆盖变化和气候变化对哥伦比亚安第斯山脉两种生态系统服务的时空及累积影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 1;685:1181-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.275. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China.基于土地利用变化的中国增城多种生态系统服务的时空评估及权衡。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;609:1569-1581. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.221. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Spatio-temporal pattern and driving forces of ecosystem services in coalfields of Shanxi Pro-vince, China.中国山西省煤矿区生态系统服务的时空格局及驱动因素。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3923-3932. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.004.
7
How did climate drying reduce ecosystem carbon storage in the forest-steppe ecotone? A case study in Inner Mongolia, China.气候干燥如何减少森林草原交错带生态系统的碳储存?以内蒙古为例的案例研究。
J Plant Res. 2010 Jul;123(4):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s10265-010-0311-z. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
8
Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China.模拟未来气候变化和生态恢复对中国两个生态保护区和三个生态带生态系统服务权衡与协同的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217849.
9
Ecosystem services changes between 2000 and 2015 in the Loess Plateau, China: A response to ecological restoration.2000-2015 年中国黄土高原生态系统服务变化:对生态恢复的响应。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 28;14(1):e0209483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209483. eCollection 2019.
10
Impacts of land use and land cover change on the interactions among multiple soil-dependent ecosystem services (case study: Jiroft plain, Iran).土地利用和土地覆被变化对多种依赖土壤的生态系统服务相互作用的影响(以伊朗吉尔福特平原为例)。
Environ Geochem Health. 2021 Oct;43(10):3977-3996. doi: 10.1007/s10653-021-00875-5. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Kubuqi Desert Wind Erosion Prevention Service and drivers of the actual wind erosion studies Based on RWEQ Model from 2000 to 2022.基于RWEQ模型对2000年至2022年库布齐沙漠风蚀防治服务及实际风蚀驱动因素的评估
PLoS One. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0321260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321260. eCollection 2025.
2
Annual 30 m land cover dataset on the Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2023.1990年至2023年青藏高原年度30米土地覆盖数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Mar 27;12(1):510. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04759-6.
3
Responses of Soil Microbial Communities Associated with Phosphorus Transformation to Land-Use Alternations in a Meadow Grassland, Northeast China.
中国东北草甸草原磷转化相关土壤微生物群落对土地利用变化的响应
Microorganisms. 2025 Mar 8;13(3):624. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030624.
4
Spatial-Temporal Changes and Simulation of Land Use in Metropolitan Areas: A Case of the Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China.大都市地区土地利用的时空变化与模拟:以中国郑州市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14089. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114089.
5
Trends in Lakeshore Zone Development: A Comparison of Polish and Hungarian Lakes over 30-Year Period.湖滨区开发趋势:30 年来波兰和匈牙利湖泊的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;19(4):2141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042141.
6
Trade-Off and Projecting Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services under Different Policies Scenarios: A Case Study in Central China.不同政策情景下土地利用变化对生态系统服务权衡与预测影响——以华中地区为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;18(7):3552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073552.