Phadnis Joideep Sunil, Vaughan Alex, Luokkala Toni, Peters Jonathon, Watson Jay J, Watts Adam
Trauma & Orthopaedics, Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.
Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK.
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec;12(6):414-421. doi: 10.1177/1758573219831662. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
Tension band wiring and plate fixation are common techniques used to stabilize simple olecranon fractures and osteotomies of the olecranon. All suture fixation is an alternative technique but has not been compared previously to these traditional methods. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the three techniques.
One hundred and sixty-eight consecutive Mayo type 1 and 2 olecranon fractures (n = 138) and olecranon osteotomies (n = 30) with a minimum follow-up time of one year were compared. The primary outcome measure was the rate of re-operation. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence of complications, rate of radiographic union and incidence of radiographic reduction loss.
Fixation was performed using tension band wiring in 89 patients, plating in 38 patients and suture fixation in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in the fracture type according to the Mayo classification between the groups. The re-operation rate was significantly higher in the tension band wiring group (36%) compared with both the plate group (11%, p = 0.03) and the suture group (2%, p = 0.002). There were two revision fixations in the tension band wiring group and one in the suture group. There was one asymptomatic non-union in the suture group. All other fractures and osteotomies achieved radiographic union.
Suture fixation of simple olecranon fractures and osteotomies was reliable in providing stable union and had a significantly lower re-operation rate when compared with tension band wiring.
张力带钢丝固定和钢板固定是用于稳定单纯鹰嘴骨折和鹰嘴截骨的常用技术。全缝线固定是一种替代技术,但此前尚未与这些传统方法进行比较。本研究的目的是比较这三种技术的临床和影像学结果。
对168例连续的梅奥1型和2型鹰嘴骨折(n = 138)和鹰嘴截骨(n = 30)进行比较,最小随访时间为1年。主要结局指标是再次手术率。次要结局指标是并发症发生率、影像学愈合率和影像学复位丢失发生率。
89例患者采用张力带钢丝固定,38例患者采用钢板固定,41例患者采用缝线固定。各组之间根据梅奥分类的骨折类型无显著差异。张力带钢丝固定组的再次手术率(36%)显著高于钢板组(11%,p = 0.03)和缝线组(2%,p = 0.002)。张力带钢丝固定组有2例翻修固定,缝线组有1例。缝线组有1例无症状骨不连。所有其他骨折和截骨均实现影像学愈合。
单纯鹰嘴骨折和截骨的缝线固定在提供稳定愈合方面可靠,与张力带钢丝固定相比,再次手术率显著更低。