Suppr超能文献

鹰嘴全缝线固定与张力带钢丝固定及钢板固定的比较。

Comparison of all suture fixation with tension band wiring and plate fixation of the olecranon.

作者信息

Phadnis Joideep Sunil, Vaughan Alex, Luokkala Toni, Peters Jonathon, Watson Jay J, Watts Adam

机构信息

Trauma & Orthopaedics, Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.

Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec;12(6):414-421. doi: 10.1177/1758573219831662. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tension band wiring and plate fixation are common techniques used to stabilize simple olecranon fractures and osteotomies of the olecranon. All suture fixation is an alternative technique but has not been compared previously to these traditional methods. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the three techniques.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-eight consecutive Mayo type 1 and 2 olecranon fractures (n = 138) and olecranon osteotomies (n = 30) with a minimum follow-up time of one year were compared. The primary outcome measure was the rate of re-operation. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence of complications, rate of radiographic union and incidence of radiographic reduction loss.

RESULTS

Fixation was performed using tension band wiring in 89 patients, plating in 38 patients and suture fixation in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in the fracture type according to the Mayo classification between the groups. The re-operation rate was significantly higher in the tension band wiring group (36%) compared with both the plate group (11%, p = 0.03) and the suture group (2%, p = 0.002). There were two revision fixations in the tension band wiring group and one in the suture group. There was one asymptomatic non-union in the suture group. All other fractures and osteotomies achieved radiographic union.

CONCLUSION

Suture fixation of simple olecranon fractures and osteotomies was reliable in providing stable union and had a significantly lower re-operation rate when compared with tension band wiring.

摘要

背景

张力带钢丝固定和钢板固定是用于稳定单纯鹰嘴骨折和鹰嘴截骨的常用技术。全缝线固定是一种替代技术,但此前尚未与这些传统方法进行比较。本研究的目的是比较这三种技术的临床和影像学结果。

方法

对168例连续的梅奥1型和2型鹰嘴骨折(n = 138)和鹰嘴截骨(n = 30)进行比较,最小随访时间为1年。主要结局指标是再次手术率。次要结局指标是并发症发生率、影像学愈合率和影像学复位丢失发生率。

结果

89例患者采用张力带钢丝固定,38例患者采用钢板固定,41例患者采用缝线固定。各组之间根据梅奥分类的骨折类型无显著差异。张力带钢丝固定组的再次手术率(36%)显著高于钢板组(11%,p = 0.03)和缝线组(2%,p = 0.002)。张力带钢丝固定组有2例翻修固定,缝线组有1例。缝线组有1例无症状骨不连。所有其他骨折和截骨均实现影像学愈合。

结论

单纯鹰嘴骨折和截骨的缝线固定在提供稳定愈合方面可靠,与张力带钢丝固定相比,再次手术率显著更低。

相似文献

3
Surgical interventions for treating fractures of the olecranon in adults.成人尺骨鹰嘴骨折的手术治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 26;2014(11):CD010144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010144.pub2.
5
Tension Suture Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.鹰嘴骨折的张力缝合固定术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Jun 3;11(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00042. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

引用本文的文献

8
Tension Suture Fixation of Olecranon Fractures.鹰嘴骨折的张力缝合固定术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2021 Jun 3;11(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.20.00042. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of displaced olecranon fractures treated with the Olecranon Sled.Olecranon Sled 治疗移位性尺骨鹰嘴骨折的疗效。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Mar;27(3):393-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
2
Tension band suture fixation for olecranon fractures.鹰嘴骨折的张力带缝线固定术
Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Oct;9(4):299-303. doi: 10.1177/1758573216687305. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
Olecranon Fractures.鹰嘴骨折
Hand Clin. 2015 Nov;31(4):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
Surgical techniques of olecranon fractures.尺骨鹰嘴骨折的手术技术。
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Aug;39(8):1606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.014.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验