Bang Madsen Kathrine, Vogdrup Petersen Liselotte, Plana-Ripoll Oleguer, Musliner Katherine L, Philippe Debost Jean-Christophe, Hordam Gronemann Frederikke, Mortensen Preben Bo, Munk-Olsen Trine
National Centre for Register-Based Research, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Allé 26, Building R, Aarhus V, 8210, Denmark; iPSYCH, The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Aarhus, Denmark.
National Centre for Register-based Research, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Nov 17;10:2045125320973791. doi: 10.1177/2045125320973791. eCollection 2020.
Depression is one of the leading causes of premature workforce exit in many Western countries, but little is known about the extent to which treatment-resistance reduces number of work-years. We compared the risk of premature workforce exit among patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) relative to non-TRD patients and estimated work years lost (WYL) before scheduled retirement age.
The study population, identified in the Danish National Prescription Registry, included all individuals born and living in Denmark who redeemed their first antidepressant (AD) prescription for depression at age 18-60 years between 2005 and 2012. TRD was defined as failure to respond to at least two different treatment trials. Premature workforce exit was measured using disability pension records. We used Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for premature workforce exit in TRD relative to non-TRD patients, adjusting for calendar year, psychiatric and somatic comorbidity, and educational level. Differences in WYL in patients with TRD and all depression patients were estimated through a competing risks model.
Out of the total sample of patients with depression ( = 129,945), 7478 (5.75%) were classified as having TRD. During follow up, 17% of patients with TRD and 8% of non-TRD patients received disability pension, resulting in a greater than three-fold larger risk of premature workforce exit [adjusted HR (aHR) 3.23 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.05-3.43]. The TRD group lost on average six work-years (95% CI 5.64-6.47) more than the total sample due to early labor force exit. The association between TRD and age at premature workforce exit was inversely U-shaped; the hazard rate of premature workforce exit for patients with TRD compared with non-TRD patients was highest in the age groups 31-35, 36-40, and 41-45 years.
Patients with TRD constitute a small group within depression patients, but contribute disproportionally to societal costs due to premature workforce exit at a young age.
在许多西方国家,抑郁症是导致劳动力过早退出的主要原因之一,但关于治疗抵抗对工作年限减少的影响程度,人们知之甚少。我们比较了难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者与非TRD患者过早退出劳动力市场的风险,并估计了在预定退休年龄之前损失的工作年限(WYL)。
在丹麦国家处方登记处确定的研究人群包括2005年至2012年期间在丹麦出生并居住、年龄在18至60岁之间首次因抑郁症开具抗抑郁药(AD)处方的所有个体。TRD被定义为对至少两种不同治疗试验无反应。使用残疾养老金记录来衡量过早退出劳动力市场的情况。我们使用Cox回归来估计TRD患者相对于非TRD患者过早退出劳动力市场的风险比(HR),并对历年、精神和躯体合并症以及教育水平进行调整。通过竞争风险模型估计TRD患者和所有抑郁症患者的WYL差异。
在抑郁症患者总样本(n = 129,945)中,7478例(5.75%)被归类为患有TRD。在随访期间,17%的TRD患者和8%的非TRD患者领取了残疾养老金,导致过早退出劳动力市场的风险增加了两倍多[调整后的HR(aHR)3.23,95%置信区间(CI)3.05 - 3.43]。由于劳动力过早退出,TRD组比总样本平均多损失6个工作年限(95% CI 5.64 - 6.47)。TRD与过早退出劳动力市场的年龄之间的关联呈倒U形;与非TRD患者相比,TRD患者过早退出劳动力市场的风险率在31 - 35岁、36 - 40岁和41 - 45岁年龄组中最高。
TRD患者在抑郁症患者中占比小,但由于年轻时过早退出劳动力市场,对社会成本的贡献不成比例。