Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020420. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020420.
An estimated 200 million women and girls in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) wish to delay, space or avoid becoming pregnant, yet are not using contraceptives. This study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of mass media interventions for increasing knowledge and use of contraceptives, and to identify barriers to program implementation.
Using a mixed-methods systematic approach, we searched five electronic databases using pre-determined search strategies and hand-searching of articles of any study design published from 1994 to 2017 of mass media interventions for family planning education. Two reviewers independently applied clearly defined eligibility criteria to the search results, quality appraisal, data extraction from published reports, and data analysis (using meta-analysis and thematic analysis) following PRISMA guidelines.
We identified 59 eligible studies. Although the majority of studies suggest a positive association between media interventions and family planning outcomes, the pooled results are still consistent with possibly null intervention effects. The reported prevalence ratios (PR) for media interventions association with increased contraceptive knowledge range from 0.97 to 1.41, while the PRs for contraceptive use range from 0.54 to 3.23. The qualitative analysis indicates that there are barriers to contraceptive uptake at the level of individual knowledge (including demographic factors and preconceived notions), access (including issues relating to mobility and financing), and programming (including lack of participatory approaches).
There is a need for rigorous impact evaluation, including randomised controlled trials, of mass media interventions on knowledge and uptake of family planning in LMIC settings. Interventions should be better tailored to cultural and socio-demographic characteristics of the target populations, while access to resources should continue to remain a priority and be improved, where possible.
据估计,在中低收入国家(LMICs)有 2 亿女性希望延迟、控制或避免怀孕,但她们并未使用避孕措施。本研究旨在调查大众媒体干预措施对提高避孕知识和使用的有效性,并确定实施障碍。
我们采用混合方法系统方法,使用预定的搜索策略搜索五个电子数据库,并对手头研究设计的任何文章进行搜索,这些文章的发表时间为 1994 年至 2017 年,内容涉及计划生育教育的大众媒体干预措施。两位评审员独立地对搜索结果、质量评估、从已发表报告中提取数据以及根据 PRISMA 指南进行数据分析(使用荟萃分析和主题分析)应用明确的纳入标准。
我们确定了 59 项符合条件的研究。尽管大多数研究表明媒体干预与计划生育结果之间存在积极关联,但汇总结果仍然符合可能为零的干预效果。报告的媒体干预与增加避孕知识之间的比值比(PR)范围为 0.97 至 1.41,而避孕使用的 PR 范围为 0.54 至 3.23。定性分析表明,在个人知识(包括人口统计因素和先入为主的观念)、获取途径(包括与流动性和融资相关的问题)和规划(包括缺乏参与性方法)方面存在着接受避孕措施的障碍。
需要在中低收入国家环境中对大众媒体干预措施对计划生育知识和接受程度的影响进行严格的评估,包括随机对照试验。干预措施应更好地适应目标人群的文化和社会人口特征,同时继续优先考虑并改善资源获取问题。