Liao Yeh-Kai, Shyu Shaw-Gang, Wu Chueh-Hung
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Med Ultrasound. 2020 Mar 26;28(3):181-184. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_105_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
Intervention under ultrasonography (US) guidance has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. This study aimed to assess the treatment response to US-guided musculoskeletal interventions in daily practice.
This retrospective study sought to identify the treatment response to US-guided interventions in different tissues conducted between January 2017 and December 2018. The treatment response to various US-guided interventions in different tissues was recorded. The response was further classified into positive response and negative response according to the improvement of symptoms or satisfaction of the treatment.
Among the 605 interventions included for data analysis, a positive response rate of 81% was observed in this study for all US-guided interventions, ranging from 70% to 88% in different categories.
This real-world analysis demonstrated the effectiveness of various US-guided interventions without serious complications. We recommend US as a useful guidance for a variety of injections.
近年来，超声（US）引导下的干预措施越来越普遍。本研究旨在评估在日常实践中超声引导下肌肉骨骼干预的治疗反应。
这项回顾性研究旨在确定2017年1月至2018年12月期间在不同组织中进行的超声引导下干预的治疗反应。记录了不同组织中各种超声引导下干预的治疗反应。根据症状改善或治疗满意度，将反应进一步分为阳性反应和阴性反应。
在纳入数据分析的605例干预措施中，本研究观察到所有超声引导下干预的阳性反应率为81%，不同类别中阳性反应率在70%至88%之间。
这项真实世界分析证明了各种超声引导下干预措施的有效性，且无严重并发症。我们推荐超声作为各种注射的有用引导手段。
