Sherman Nathan C, C Sorenson Jacob, M Khwaja Ansab, L DeSilva Gregory
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona.
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Oct 28;5(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00087. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
Applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs face a competitive match. Internet resources such as program websites allow prospective applicants to gauge interest in particular programs. This study evaluated the content and accessibility of orthopaedic surgery residency program websites.
Existing orthopaedic surgery residency programs for the 2020 application cycle were identified on the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) website. Individual program websites were accessed through links directly from the ERAS website, and a Google search for each program was performed to corroborate accessibility. Programs websites were then reviewed and evaluated on the presence of 20 criteria selected for their potential to influence resident recruitment (10) and education (10), respectively. The results were compared with the lone 2001 study and with orthopaedic fellowship website analyses.
One hundred eighty-nine orthopaedic surgery residency programs were accredited at the time of the study. Only 6 programs (3.2%) did not have a website identifiable through ERAS or Google searches, leaving a final sample size of 183 websites. Approximately 73.3% of all recruitment content and 44.9% of education content were present on the websites available. There was a significant increase in all available recruitment and education content (p < 0.05) when compared with the lone 2001 study. Orthopaedic residency program websites provide comparable recruitment content at a higher rate (71.1%) than orthopaedic fellowship websites (59.6%) but fall slightly below average in presentation of education content (44.9% vs 45.9%).
This is the first study in nearly 20 years to assess the content and accessibility of orthopaedic residency program websites. There is noticeable variability in the presentation of website content, but approximately 73.3% of recruitment content and 44.9% of the educational content were easily accessible through internet search. Orthopaedic surgery residency programs and their applicants may benefit from standardization of program websites and an increase in recruitment and education content.
申请骨科手术住院医师培训项目面临激烈竞争。诸如项目网站等互联网资源使潜在申请者能够衡量对特定项目的兴趣。本研究评估了骨科手术住院医师培训项目网站的内容和可访问性。
在电子住院医师申请服务(ERAS)网站上确定了2020年申请周期的现有骨科手术住院医师培训项目。通过直接从ERAS网站的链接访问各个项目网站,并对每个项目进行谷歌搜索以证实其可访问性。然后根据为其影响住院医师招聘(10项)和教育(10项)的潜力而选择的20项标准对项目网站进行审查和评估。将结果与2001年唯一的一项研究以及骨科专科 fellowship网站分析进行比较。
在研究时,有189个骨科手术住院医师培训项目获得认证。只有6个项目(3.2%)没有通过ERAS或谷歌搜索识别出的网站,最终样本量为183个网站。所有网站上约73.3%的招聘内容和44.9%的教育内容可用。与2001年唯一的一项研究相比,所有可用的招聘和教育内容都有显著增加(p < 0.05)。骨科住院医师培训项目网站提供可比招聘内容的比例(71.1%)高于骨科专科 fellowship网站(59.6%),但在教育内容展示方面略低于平均水平(44.9%对45.9%)。
这是近20年来第一项评估骨科住院医师培训项目网站内容和可访问性的研究。网站内容展示存在明显差异,但通过互联网搜索,约73.3%的招聘内容和44.9%的教育内容易于获取。骨科手术住院医师培训项目及其申请者可能会从项目网站的标准化以及招聘和教育内容的增加中受益。