Division of Infectious Diseases and Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;72(12):e1035-e1043. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1824.
New, sensitive diagnostic tests facilitate identification and investigation of milder forms of tuberculosis (TB) disease. We used community-based TB testing with the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay ("Ultra") to characterize individuals with previously undiagnosed TB and compare them to those from the same community who were diagnosed with TB through routine care.
We offered community-based sputum Ultra testing to adult residents of a well-defined area (population 34 000 adults) in Kampala, Uganda, via door-to-door screening and venue-based testing, then used detailed interview and laboratory testing to characterize TB-positive individuals. We compared these individuals to residents diagnosed with pulmonary TB at local health facilities and a representative sample of residents without TB (controls).
Of 12 032 residents with interpretable Ultra results, 113 (940 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 780-1130] per 100 000) tested positive, including 71 (63%) positive at the lowest (trace) level. A spectrum of TB disease was observed in terms of chronic cough (93% among health facility-diagnosed cases, 77% among residents with positive community-based Ultra results at levels above trace, 33% among trace-positive community participants, and 18% among TB-negative controls), TB symptom prevalence (99%, 87%, 60%, and 38%, respectively), and C-reactive protein (75th percentile: 101 mg/L, 28 mg/L, 6 mg/L, and 4 mg/L, respectively). Community-diagnosed cases were less likely than health facility-diagnosed cases to have human immunodeficiency virus coinfection or previous TB. The specificity of Ultra was 99.4% (95% CI, 99.2%-99.5%) relative to a single spot sputum culture.
People with undiagnosed prevalent TB in the community have different characteristics than those diagnosed with pulmonary TB in health facilities. Newer diagnostic tests may identify a group of people with early or very mild disease.
新的、敏感的诊断检测方法有助于发现和调查较轻形式的结核病(TB)疾病。我们使用基于社区的 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 检测(“Ultra”)对以前未确诊的 TB 患者进行检测,并将其与通过常规护理诊断为 TB 的同一社区的患者进行比较。
我们通过上门筛查和场地检测,向乌干达坎帕拉一个界定明确的地区(34000 名成年居民)的成年居民提供基于社区的痰液 Ultra 检测,然后使用详细的访谈和实验室检测来描述 TB 阳性个体。我们将这些个体与在当地卫生机构诊断为肺结核的居民和没有 TB(对照组)的代表性居民样本进行比较。
在可解释的 Ultra 结果的 12032 名居民中,有 113 人(940[95%置信区间{CI},780-1130]每 100000 人)检测呈阳性,包括 71 人(63%)呈最低(痕迹)水平阳性。从慢性咳嗽的角度来看(在卫生机构确诊病例中为 93%,在社区 Ultra 检测结果呈阳性且高于痕迹水平的居民中为 77%,在痕迹阳性社区参与者中为 33%,在 TB 阴性对照组中为 18%),观察到一系列 TB 疾病,TB 症状的流行率(分别为 99%、87%、60%和 38%),以及 C 反应蛋白(第 75 个百分位数:101mg/L、28mg/L、6mg/L 和 4mg/L)。与卫生机构确诊病例相比,社区确诊病例更不可能合并人类免疫缺陷病毒感染或既往 TB。与单次痰培养相比,Ultra 的特异性为 99.4%(95%CI,99.2%-99.5%)。
社区中未确诊的流行 TB 患者与在卫生机构中诊断为肺结核的患者具有不同的特征。新的诊断检测方法可能会发现一组患有早期或非常轻度疾病的人。