Suppr超能文献

关注临床与社区之间的差距:在大规模结核病筛查中,我们应该对假阳性检测结果有多担心?

Mind the clinic-community gap: how concerned should we be about false positive test results in mass tuberculosis screening?

作者信息

Veeken Lara D, Schwalb Alvaro, Horton Katherine C, Koesoemadinata Raspati C, Alisjahbana Bachti, van Crevel Reinout, Houben Rein M G J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Community for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

TB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf268.

Abstract

Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.

摘要

对细菌学确诊的肺结核进行社区范围内的筛查可能会减轻结核病负担,不过由于目前用于筛查的细菌学检测特异性欠佳导致假阳性诊断,过度治疗的担忧依然存在。我们的综述和数据分析表明,基于诊所的Xpert检测相对于培养的特异性估计值低估了其在社区中的表现,无论是Xpert MTB/RIF(社区=99.8%,诊所=98.4%)还是Xpert Ultra(社区=99.4%,诊所=95.6%),与基于诊所的特异性估计值相比,分别将以培养为参考的痰Xpert假定假阳性率降低了86.8%和85.4%。这些发现支持对社区范围内的结核病筛查进行大规模评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验