Veeken Lara D, Schwalb Alvaro, Horton Katherine C, Koesoemadinata Raspati C, Alisjahbana Bachti, van Crevel Reinout, Houben Rein M G J
Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Community for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
TB Modelling Group, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
J Infect Dis. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf268.
Community-wide screening for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis may reduce tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses due to subpar specificity of current bacteriological tests for screening. Our review and data analysis shows that clinic-based test specificity estimates of Xpert against culture underestimate performance in communities, both for Xpert MTB/RIF (community=99.8% vs clinic=98.4%) and Xpert Ultra (community=99.4% vs clinic=95.6%), reducing the presumed false positivity of sputum Xpert using culture as reference by 86.8% and 85.4%, respectively, as compared to clinic-based specificity estimates. These findings support large-scale evaluation of community-wide screening for tuberculosis.
对细菌学确诊的肺结核进行社区范围内的筛查可能会减轻结核病负担,不过由于目前用于筛查的细菌学检测特异性欠佳导致假阳性诊断,过度治疗的担忧依然存在。我们的综述和数据分析表明,基于诊所的Xpert检测相对于培养的特异性估计值低估了其在社区中的表现,无论是Xpert MTB/RIF(社区=99.8%,诊所=98.4%)还是Xpert Ultra(社区=99.4%,诊所=95.6%),与基于诊所的特异性估计值相比,分别将以培养为参考的痰Xpert假定假阳性率降低了86.8%和85.4%。这些发现支持对社区范围内的结核病筛查进行大规模评估。