End-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis with distal vein ligation for arteriovenous fistula creation.

INTRODUCTION

There is lack of compelling evidence about the best technique to carry out the anastomosis between the artery and the vein: end to side or side to side. This issue was addressed by very few randomized controlled studies. This topic has recently re-emerged with the advent of the endovascular fistula creation using the side-to-side technique. To compare the results of both surgical techniques for the creation of arteriovenous anastomosis.

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled prospective study. All renal failure patients, 18 years and older, referred to our institution requiring creation of a new arm arteriovenous fistulas, including distal radio-cephalic, ulno-basilic, proximal brachio-cephalic or brachio-basilic configurations were included.

RESULTS

Between February 2018 and October 2018, 378 patients underwent creation of permanent haemodialysis access. A total of 100 patients were randomized equally into the end-to-side and side-to-side groups. Follow-up for the study purpose continued until May 2019 (mean = 9 months, range 1-12). Patients' age ranged from 19 to 68 years. Sevety-seven arteriovenous fistulas were created at the elbow (37 brachio-basilic and 40 brachio-cephalic). Radio-cephalic fistulae were 23, created at wrist and in the forearm. Primary technical success was 97%, and 35 (70%) and 17 (34%) cases achieved functionally maturation in the end-to-side and side-to-side groups, respectively (P = 0.0001). Primary and secondary patency rates at 12 months were 76% end to side versus 78% STS (P = 0.381) and 84% end to side versus 86% STS (P = 0.225), respectively.

CONCLUSION

End-to-side technique should be used in all instances of arteriovenous fistulas creation.