• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际在线患者和护理人员群体对痉挛负担和肉毒毒素治疗影响的观点:调查研究。

Perspective of an International Online Patient and Caregiver Community on the Burden of Spasticity and Impact of Botulinum Neurotoxin Therapy: Survey Study.

机构信息

Kansas City Bone & Joint Clinic, Overland Park, KS, United States.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 7;6(4):e17928. doi: 10.2196/17928.

DOI:10.2196/17928
PMID:33284124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7752537/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient- and caregiver-reported data are lacking on the burden of spasticity, and the impact of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment for this condition, on patients' daily lives. As recommended in recent guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, online patient communities can represent a platform from which to gather specific information outside of a clinical trial setting on the burden of conditions experienced by patients and caregivers and their views on treatment options in order to inform evidence-based medicine and drug development.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study is to characterize spasticity symptoms and their associated burdens on Western European and US patients and caregivers in the realms of work, daily activities, quality of life (QoL), as well as the positive and negative impacts of treatment with BoNT-A (cost, time, QoL) using Carenity, an international online community for people with chronic health conditions.

METHODS

We performed a noninterventional, multinational survey. Eligible participants were 18 years old or older and had, or had cared for, someone with spasticity who had been treated with BoNT-A for at least 1 year. Patients and caregivers were asked to complete an internet-based survey via Carenity; caregivers reported their own answers and answered on behalf of their patients. Questions included the burden of spasticity on the ability to work, functioning, daily-living activities, and QoL, the impact of BoNT A therapy on patients' lives, and the potential benefits of fewer injections.

RESULTS

There were 615 respondents (427 patients and 188 caregivers). The mean age of patients and caregivers was 41.7 years and 38.6 years, respectively, and the most commonly reported cause of spasticity was multiple sclerosis. Caregivers were most often the parents (76/188, 40%) or another family member (51/188, 27%) of their patients. Spasticity had a clear impact on patients' and caregivers' lives, including the ability to work and injection costs. For patients, spasticity caused difficulties with activities of daily living and reduced QoL indices. The median number of BoNT-A injections was 4 times per year, and 92% (393/427) of patients reported that treatment improved their overall satisfaction with life. Regarding the BoNT-A injection burden, the greatest patient-reported challenges were the cost and availability of timely appointments. Overall, 86% (368/427) of patients believed that a reduced injection frequency would be beneficial. Caregivers answering for their patients gave largely similar responses to those reported by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Spasticity has a negative impact on both patients' and caregivers' lives. All respondents reported that BoNT A treatment improved their lives, despite the associated challenges. Patients believed that reducing the frequency of BoNT-A injections could alleviate practical issues associated with treatment, implying that a longer-acting BoNT-A injection would be well received.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/6b41347c68de/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/fb70db8e550f/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/e3bce3b8a1d5/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/d40baa43a920/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/87326467132b/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/6b41347c68de/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/fb70db8e550f/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/e3bce3b8a1d5/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/d40baa43a920/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/87326467132b/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcfe/7752537/6b41347c68de/publichealth_v6i4e17928_fig5.jpg
摘要

背景

缺乏患者和照护者报告的关于痉挛负担的信息,以及肉毒毒素 A 型(BoNT-A)治疗对患者日常生活的影响。根据美国食品和药物管理局最近的指南建议,在线患者社区可以作为一种平台,在临床试验环境之外收集患者和照护者所经历的疾病的具体信息,以及他们对治疗方案的看法,以便为循证医学和药物开发提供信息。

目的

本研究的目的是使用国际在线社区 Carenity,描述西欧和美国患者和照护者的痉挛症状及其相关负担,包括在工作、日常活动、生活质量(QoL)方面的负担,以及 BoNT-A(成本、时间、QoL)治疗的积极和消极影响。

方法

我们进行了一项非干预性、多国调查。符合条件的参与者年龄在 18 岁或以上,并且有或照顾过接受 BoNT-A 治疗至少 1 年的痉挛患者。患者和照护者通过 Carenity 完成在线调查;照护者报告自己的答案,并代表患者回答。问题包括痉挛对工作能力、功能、日常生活活动和生活质量的负担、BoNT-A 治疗对患者生活的影响以及减少注射次数的潜在益处。

结果

共有 615 名受访者(427 名患者和 188 名照护者)。患者和照护者的平均年龄分别为 41.7 岁和 38.6 岁,痉挛最常见的病因是多发性硬化症。照护者最常是患者的父母(76/188,40%)或其他家庭成员(51/188,27%)。痉挛对患者和照护者的生活有明显影响,包括工作能力和注射费用。对于患者,痉挛导致日常生活活动困难和降低生活质量指数。BoNT-A 注射的中位数次数为每年 4 次,92%(393/427)的患者报告治疗改善了他们对生活的总体满意度。关于 BoNT-A 注射负担,患者报告的最大挑战是成本和及时预约的可用性。总体而言,86%(368/427)的患者认为减少注射频率将是有益的。代表患者回答的照护者的回答与患者报告的回答基本相似。

结论

痉挛对患者和照护者的生活都有负面影响。所有受访者都报告说 BoNT-A 治疗改善了他们的生活,尽管存在相关挑战。患者认为减少 BoNT-A 注射的频率可以缓解治疗相关的实际问题,这意味着一种作用时间更长的 BoNT-A 注射将受到欢迎。

相似文献

1
Perspective of an International Online Patient and Caregiver Community on the Burden of Spasticity and Impact of Botulinum Neurotoxin Therapy: Survey Study.国际在线患者和护理人员群体对痉挛负担和肉毒毒素治疗影响的观点:调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 7;6(4):e17928. doi: 10.2196/17928.
2
Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Upper Limb Spasticity Poststroke Over Different ICF Domains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脑卒后患上肢痉挛的肉毒毒素治疗效果:基于 ICF 不同领域的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Sep;100(9):1703-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
3
An international survey of patients living with spasticity.一项针对痉挛患者的国际调查。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jul;39(14):1428-1434. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1198432. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
4
Patient Perspectives on the Therapeutic Profile of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Spasticity.患者对A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素治疗痉挛的疗效的看法。
Front Neurol. 2020 May 7;11:388. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00388. eCollection 2020.
5
Discontinuation of botulinum neurotoxin type-A treatment during COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian survey in post stroke and traumatic brain injury patients living with spasticity.COVID-19 大流行期间停止使用肉毒毒素 A 治疗:意大利一项针对伴有痉挛的脑卒中及创伤性脑损伤患者的调查。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun;57(3):424-433. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06478-3. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
Ergonomic Recommendations in Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Neurotoxin Chemodenervation for Spasticity: An International Expert Group Opinion.超声引导肉毒毒素化学神经切断术治疗痉挛的人体工效学建议:国际专家小组意见。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Mar 31;13(4):249. doi: 10.3390/toxins13040249.
7
Spotlight on botulinum toxin and its potential in the treatment of stroke-related spasticity.聚焦肉毒杆菌毒素及其在治疗中风相关性痉挛方面的潜力。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Mar 8;10:1085-99. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S80804. eCollection 2016.
8
COVID-19-related delays of botulinum toxin injections have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients with dystonia and spasticity: a single-center ambulatory care study.新冠疫情导致肉毒毒素注射延迟,对肌张力障碍和痉挛患者的生活质量产生负面影响:一项单中心门诊护理研究。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Jan;129(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02430-z. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
[Use of botulinum neurotoxin for spasticity].[肉毒杆菌神经毒素用于治疗痉挛]
Brain Nerve. 2008 Dec;60(12):1421-6.
10
Functional impact of different muscle localization techniques for Botulinum neurotoxin A injections in clinical routine management of post-stroke spasticity.在中风后痉挛的临床常规管理中,不同肌肉定位技术对注射A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素的功能影响。
Brain Inj. 2017;31(1):75-82. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1218545. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
What stroke survivors say about living with upper limb spasticity and how they manage it.中风幸存者如何看待上肢痉挛的生活状态以及他们是如何应对的。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Oct;72(5):e70045. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70045.
2
How many stroke survivors develop problematic spasticity requiring pharmacological therapy? An international (Europe and USA) observational study protocol.有多少中风幸存者会出现需要药物治疗的问题性痉挛?一项国际(欧洲和美国)观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e087404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087404.
3
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in adults after stroke or traumatic brain injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Duration of Symptom Relief Between Injections for AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in Spastic Paresis and Cervical Dystonia: Comparison of Evidence From Clinical Studies.用于痉挛性麻痹和颈部肌张力障碍的阿柏西普肉毒素A(Dysport®)注射之间症状缓解的持续时间:临床研究证据比较
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 25;11:576117. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576117. eCollection 2020.
2
Patient Perspectives on the Therapeutic Profile of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Spasticity.患者对A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素治疗痉挛的疗效的看法。
Front Neurol. 2020 May 7;11:388. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00388. eCollection 2020.
3
Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life in idiopathic dystonia patients under botulinum toxin treatment: a cross-sectional study.
一项关于注射用达昔布妥昔单抗治疗中风或创伤性脑损伤后成人上肢痉挛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
PM R. 2025 Feb;17(2):126-136. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13258. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
4
Recognition, Description, and Variability of Spasticity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis and Potential Barriers to Clinician-Patient Dialogue: Results From SEEN-MSS, a Large-Scale, Self-Reported Survey.多发性硬化症患者痉挛的识别、描述及变异性以及医患对话的潜在障碍:大规模自我报告调查SEEN-MSS的结果
Int J MS Care. 2024 Mar-Apr;26(2):75-80. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2022-115. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
A Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Greece.在希腊,阿巴丁毒素 A 的成本效益和预算影响分析。
Toxins (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;15(9):561. doi: 10.3390/toxins15090561.
6
A UK Single-Center, Retrospective, Noninterventional Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Two BotulinumtoxinA Treatments for Limb Spasticity.一项英国单中心、回顾性、非干预性研究,评估两种肉毒毒素 A 治疗肢体痉挛的临床结局和成本。
Toxins (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;15(9):532. doi: 10.3390/toxins15090532.
7
Botulinum toxin use in patients with post-stroke spasticity: a nationwide retrospective study from France.肉毒杆菌毒素用于中风后痉挛患者:一项来自法国的全国性回顾性研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 23;14:1245228. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1245228. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on spasticity in upper motor neuron conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮脊髓直流电刺激对上运动神经元病痉挛的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Nov;61(11):587-599. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00928-9. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
9
Experiences of patients with poststroke spasticity throughout a botulinum toxin treatment cycle: Results from a prospective ethnographic study.中风后痉挛患者在肉毒杆菌毒素治疗周期中的体验:一项前瞻性人种学研究的结果
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 23;13:946500. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.946500. eCollection 2022.
10
Patients' Perspectives About the Treatment They Receive for Cardiovascular Diseases and Mental Disorders: Web-Based Survey Study.患者对其所接受的心血管疾病和精神障碍治疗的看法:基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 16;6(3):e32725. doi: 10.2196/32725.
肉毒杆菌毒素治疗下特发性肌张力障碍患者的照顾者负担及健康相关生活质量:一项横断面研究
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020 Jan;127(1):61-70. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02109-6. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
4
IncobotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Upper-Limb Poststroke Spasticity in the Open-Label Extension Period of PURE: Efficacy in Passive Function, Caregiver Burden, and Quality of Life.在PURE开放标签延长期中,肉毒杆菌毒素A治疗上肢中风后痉挛:对被动功能、照顾者负担及生活质量的疗效
PM R. 2020 May;12(5):491-499. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12265. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox), and IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) Neurotoxin Content and Potential Implications for Duration of Response in Patients.阿博特肉毒毒素 A(丽舒妥)、肉毒毒素 A 型(保妥适)和依库珠单抗毒素 A(Xeomin)神经毒素含量及其对患者应答持续时间的潜在影响。
Toxins (Basel). 2018 Dec 13;10(12):535. doi: 10.3390/toxins10120535.
6
Assessing patients' acceptance of their medication to reveal unmet needs: results from a large multi-diseases study using a patient online community.评估患者对其用药的接受程度以揭示未满足的需求:一项使用患者在线社区的大型多疾病研究的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jul 6;16(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0962-3.
7
Patients' Perception of Privacy of Personal Data, Shared in Online Communities: Are We in the Presence of a Paradox?患者对在线社区中共享的个人数据隐私的认知:我们是否面临一种矛盾?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:237-240.
8
Botulinum neurotoxin formulations: overcoming the confusion.肉毒杆菌神经毒素制剂:消除混淆
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018 May 30;11:273-287. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S156851. eCollection 2018.
9
Perspectives from the Patient and the Healthcare Professional in Multiple Sclerosis: Social Media and Participatory Medicine.多发性硬化症患者与医疗保健专业人员的观点:社交媒体与参与式医学
Neurol Ther. 2018 Jun;7(1):37-49. doi: 10.1007/s40120-017-0088-2. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA in spastic lower limb: Randomized trial and extension.阿柏西普用于下肢痉挛的疗效与安全性:随机试验及延长期研究
Neurology. 2017 Nov 28;89(22):2245-2253. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004687. Epub 2017 Nov 1.