McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (D.J.C., J.C.R., A.B.).
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.T., M.S., F.J.C., D.H., B.B.D., M.V.).
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Apr;174(4):493-500. doi: 10.7326/M20-6943. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has affected the hospital experience for patients, visitors, and staff.
To understand clinician perspectives on adaptations to end-of-life care for dying patients and their families during the pandemic.
Mixed-methods embedded study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04602520).
3 acute care medical units in a tertiary care hospital from 16 March to 1 July 2020.
45 dying patients, 45 family members, and 45 clinicians.
During the pandemic, clinicians continued an existing practice of collating personal information about dying patients and "what matters most," eliciting wishes, and implementing acts of compassion.
Themes from semistructured clinician interviews that were summarized with representative quotations.
Many barriers to end-of-life care arose because of infection control practices that mandated visiting restrictions and personal protective equipment, with attendant practical and psychological consequences. During hospitalization, family visits inside or outside the patient's room were possible for 36 patients (80.0%); 13 patients (28.9%) had virtual visits with a relative or friend. At the time of death, 20 patients (44.4%) had a family member at the bedside. Clinicians endeavored to prevent unmarked deaths by adopting advocacy roles to "fill the gap" of absent family and by initiating new and established ways to connect patients and relatives.
Absence of clinician symptom or wellness metrics; a single-center design.
Clinicians expressed their humanity through several intentional practices to preserve personalized, compassionate end-of-life care for dying hospitalized patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Research Coordinator Fund.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 大流行影响了患者、探视者和医护人员的医院体验。
了解临床医生对大流行期间临终患者及其家属的临终关怀适应措施的看法。
混合方法嵌入式研究。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04602520)。
2020 年 3 月 16 日至 7 月 1 日,一家三级保健医院的 3 个急性护理医疗单位。
45 名临终患者、45 名家属和 45 名临床医生。
在大流行期间,临床医生继续实施一项现有做法,即收集临终患者的个人信息和“最重要的事情”,了解患者的意愿,并实施同情行为。
对临床医生半结构化访谈的主题进行总结,并引用有代表性的引语。
由于感染控制措施要求限制探视和使用个人防护设备,导致临终护理出现许多障碍,随之带来实际和心理方面的后果。住院期间,36 名患者(80.0%)可以在患者房间内或外进行家庭探视;13 名患者(28.9%)与亲属或朋友进行了虚拟探视。在死亡时,20 名患者(44.4%)的床边有家属。临床医生通过采取倡导角色来“填补空缺”,并通过发起新的和既定的方式将患者和亲属联系起来,努力防止无人陪伴的死亡。
缺乏临床医生症状或健康指标;单中心设计。
在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,临床医生通过几种有意识的实践,表达了他们的人性,以保护住院临终患者个性化、富有同情心的临终关怀。
加拿大卫生研究院和加拿大危重病治疗组研究协调员基金。