Suppr超能文献

输尿管支架置入是否会增加膀胱癌患者发生同期上尿路尿路上皮癌的风险?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Does Ureteral Stenting Increase the Risk of Metachronous Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Bladder Tumors? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Urology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):956-966. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001548. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Ureteral stenting in patients with bladder cancer may become necessary in order to protect the ureteral orifice during transurethral resection of the tumor or for relief of upper urinary tract obstruction. However, it is believed to increase metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ureteral stenting versus nephrostomy or no drainage with regard to the risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Records were identified through database searches and sources of grey literature up to October 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42020178298).

RESULTS

Five studies (3,309 individuals) were included. Overall, 278 ureteral stents were placed and 20 (7.2%) patients developed metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma, while 131 patients were treated with nephrostomy and 3 (2.3%) cases of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma occurred. Patients treated with ureteral stents had a higher likelihood of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma compared to no stents (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.43-8.48, I=52%) and no upper urinary tract drainage (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.49-7.63, I=45%). No difference with regard to metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma was observed between stent and nephrostomy (OR: 3.07, 95% CI: 0.41-22.98, I=54%). For the same outcomes, no difference was noted for patients with hydronephrosis. The level of evidence for all measures was evaluated as low.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting as a preventive measure after resection of tumors involving the orifice should be avoided, when possible, as it increases the risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma. In cases of hydronephrosis, drainage with either nephrostomy or stent is recommended depending on individual patient cases as both interventions do not differ regarding metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma risk.

摘要

目的

在经尿道肿瘤切除术过程中为保护输尿管口或缓解上尿路梗阻,可能需要对膀胱癌患者进行输尿管支架置入。然而,人们认为这会增加上尿路上皮癌的发生风险。

材料与方法

我们对比较输尿管支架置入与肾造瘘或无引流的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估上尿路上皮癌的发生风险。通过数据库检索和灰色文献来源,检索截至 2020 年 10 月(PROSPERO:CRD42020178298)。

结果

共纳入 5 项研究(3309 例患者)。总的来说,有 278 例患者接受了输尿管支架置入,20 例(7.2%)患者发生上尿路上皮癌,131 例患者接受了肾造瘘,3 例(2.3%)患者发生上尿路上皮癌。与无支架相比,输尿管支架置入患者发生上尿路上皮癌的可能性更高(OR:3.49,95%CI:1.43-8.48,I=52%),与无尿路引流相比,也更高(OR:3.37,95%CI:1.49-7.63,I=45%)。支架与肾造瘘之间在发生上尿路上皮癌方面无差异(OR:3.07,95%CI:0.41-22.98,I=54%)。对于相同的结果,对于存在肾积水的患者,也未观察到差异。所有措施的证据水平均评估为低。

结论

在可能的情况下,应避免在肿瘤累及输尿管口后进行支架置入作为预防措施,因为这会增加上尿路上皮癌的发生风险。对于存在肾积水的患者,建议根据患者具体情况选择肾造瘘或支架引流,因为这两种干预措施在上尿路上皮癌的发生风险方面没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验