Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;53(3):703-713. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.805. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Maintenance therapy after oxaliplatin withdrawal is useful in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study aimed to investigate the timing of discontinuation or reintroduction of oxaliplatin and the optimal maintenance therapy regimen for survival.
PubMed and conference abstracts were searched to select phase II and III trials of first-line oxaliplatin-containing therapy with or without bevacizumab using maintenance therapy for mCRC. Correlations of median overall survival (OS) with induction therapy regimens, induction therapy duration, maintenance therapy regimens (fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab [FP+Bev], FP/Bev alone, and no treatment), and oxaliplatin reintroduction were investigated using correlation and weighted multivariate regression analyses.
Twenty-two treatment arms were analyzed, including 2,581 patients. The maintenance therapy regimen FP+Bev showed the strongest correlation with a prolonged OS (Spearman's partial correlation coefficient=0.42), and the other three variables correlated weakly with the OS. The maintenance therapy regimen significantly interacted with the induction chemotherapy duration (p=0.019). The predicted OS for FP+Bev crossed the lines of FP/Bev alone at 18 weeks of induction therapy, and of no treatment at 23 weeks. The corresponding OS at 12 and 27 weeks of induction therapies were 28.6 and 24.2 months for FP+Bev, 25.9 and 28.8 months for FP/Bev alone, and 20.5 and 27.5 months for no treatment.
The optimal maintenance therapy regimen for the OS is a continuous induction therapy as long as possible followed by FP/Bev alone and switching to FP+Bev within approximately 4 months if induction therapy is discontinued.
奥沙利铂停药后的维持治疗对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者有益。本研究旨在探讨停止或重新开始使用奥沙利铂的时机以及对生存有益的最佳维持治疗方案。
检索 PubMed 和会议摘要,选择含奥沙利铂一线治疗的 II 期和 III 期试验,包括有无贝伐单抗的维持治疗用于 mCRC。使用相关和加权多变量回归分析,研究与诱导治疗方案、诱导治疗持续时间、维持治疗方案(氟嘧啶加贝伐单抗[FP+Bev]、FP/Bev 单药治疗和无治疗)以及奥沙利铂再引入相关的中位总生存期(OS)的相关性。
分析了 22 个治疗臂,包括 2581 例患者。维持治疗方案 FP+Bev 与延长 OS 相关性最强(Spearman 部分相关系数=0.42),其他三个变量与 OS 相关性较弱。维持治疗方案与诱导化疗持续时间显著相关(p=0.019)。FP+Bev 的预测 OS 在诱导治疗 18 周时超过 FP/Bev 单药治疗的线,在诱导治疗 23 周时超过无治疗的线。相应的诱导治疗 12 和 27 周时的 OS 为 FP+Bev 28.6 和 24.2 个月、FP/Bev 单药治疗 25.9 和 28.8 个月、无治疗 20.5 和 27.5 个月。
OS 的最佳维持治疗方案是尽可能长时间地进行连续诱导治疗,然后如果诱导治疗停止,大约 4 个月内转为 FP/Bev 单药治疗,并切换至 FP+Bev。