Department of Oral and Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany,
Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany,
Caries Res. 2021;55(1):41-54. doi: 10.1159/000509931. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the demineralization inhibitory effect of gels/solutions used in combination with either standard or highly fluoridated dentifrices on sound dentin as well as on artificial dentin caries-like lesions.
Bovine dentin specimens (n = 240) with two different surfaces each (sound [ST] and artificial caries lesion [DT]) were prepared and randomly allocated to twelve groups. Weekly interventions during pH-cycling (28 days, 6 × 120 min demineralization/day) were: the application of gels/solutions containing amine fluoride/sodium fluoride (12,500 ppm F [ppm]; pH = 4.4; AmF); NaF (12,500 ppm; pH = 6.6; NaF1); NaF (12,500 ppm; pH = 6.3; NaF2); silver diamine fluoride (14,200 ppm; pH = 8.7; SDF); acidulated phosphate fluoride (12,500 ppm; pH = 3.8; APF), and no intervention (standard control; S). Furthermore, half of the specimens in each group were brushed (10 s; twice per day) with dentifrice slurries containing either 1,450 ppm (e.g., AmF1450) or 5,000 ppm (e.g., AmF5000). Differences in integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) and lesion depth (ΔLD) were calculated between values before and after pH-cycling using transversal microradiography.
After pH-cycling Ss showed significantly increased ΔZDT and LDDT values, indicating further demineralization. In contrast, except for one, all groups including fluoride gels/solutions showed significantly decreased ΔZDT values. Additional use of most fluoride gels/solutions significantly enhanced mineral gain, mainly in the surface area; however, acidic gels/solutions seemed to have negative effects on lesion depths.
Under the present pH-cycling conditions the highly fluoridated dentifrice significantly reduced caries progression and additional application of nearly all of the fluoride gels/solutions resulted in remineralization. However, there was no difference in the remineralizing capacity of fluoride gels/solutions when used in combination with either standard or highly fluoridated dentifrices.
本体外研究旨在比较与标准或高氟牙膏联合使用的凝胶/溶液在正常牙本质和人工牙本质龋损样病变上的脱矿抑制效果。
制备具有两种不同表面(正常[ST]和人工龋损[DT])的牛牙本质标本(n = 240),并随机分配到 12 组。在 pH 循环期间(28 天,每天 6×120 分钟脱矿)每周进行干预:应用含有胺氟/氟化钠的凝胶/溶液(12500 ppm F[ppm];pH = 4.4;AmF);氟化钠(12500 ppm;pH = 6.6;NaF1);氟化钠(12500 ppm;pH = 6.3;NaF2);银胺氟化氢(14200 ppm;pH = 8.7;SDF);酸性磷酸氟化物(12500 ppm;pH = 3.8;APF)和不干预(标准对照;S)。此外,每组的一半标本用含有 1450 ppm(例如 AmF1450)或 5000 ppm(例如 AmF5000)的牙膏糊剂刷牙(10 秒;每天两次)。使用横向显微射线照相术计算 pH 循环前后的整合矿物质损失(ΔΔZ)和病变深度(ΔLD)之间的差异。
pH 循环后 Ss 显示出显著增加的 ΔZDT 和 LDDT 值,表明进一步脱矿。相比之下,除了一个组外,所有包括氟化物凝胶/溶液的组都显示出显著降低的 ΔZDT 值。额外使用大多数氟化物凝胶/溶液显著增强了矿物质的获得,主要在表面区域;然而,酸性凝胶/溶液似乎对病变深度有负面影响。
在目前的 pH 循环条件下,高氟牙膏显著降低了龋病进展,并且几乎所有氟化物凝胶/溶液的额外应用都导致了再矿化。然而,当与标准或高氟牙膏联合使用时,氟化物凝胶/溶液的再矿化能力没有差异。