• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于熵权-层次分析法加权理想解法的新型建筑材料供应商选择多准则决策模型

A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.

作者信息

Chen Chun-Ho

机构信息

Professional Architect and Urban Planner, Bachelor Program of Real Estate Investment and Management, Takming University of Science and Technology, No.56, Sec. 1, Huanshan Rd., Neihu District, Taipei 11451, Taiwan.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;22(2):259. doi: 10.3390/e22020259.

DOI:10.3390/e22020259
PMID:33286032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7516705/
Abstract

The type of criterion weight can be distinguished according to different decision methods. Subjective weights are given by decision makers based on their knowledge, experience, expertise, and other factors. Objective weights are obtained through multi-step calculations of the evaluation matrix constructed from the actual information about the evaluation criteria of the alternatives. A single consideration of these two types of weights often results in biased results. In addition, in order to build an effective supply chain source, buyers must find suitable quality products and/or service providers in the process of supplier selection. Based on the above reasons, it is difficult to accurately select the appropriate alternative. The main contribution of this paper is to combine entropy weight, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) weight, and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method into a suitable multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) solution. The TOPSIS method is extended with entropy-AHP weights, and entropy-AHP weights are used instead of subjective weights. A novel decision-making model of TOPSIS integrated entropy-AHP weights is proposed to select the appropriate supplier. Finally, we take the selection of building material suppliers as an example and use sensitivity analysis to show that the combination of the TOPSIS method based on entropy-AHP weights can effectively select the appropriate supplier.

摘要

可以根据不同的决策方法来区分准则权重的类型。主观权重由决策者根据他们的知识、经验、专业知识和其他因素给出。客观权重是通过对由关于备选方案评估标准的实际信息构建的评估矩阵进行多步计算得到的。仅考虑这两种类型的权重中的一种往往会导致有偏差的结果。此外,为了建立有效的供应链源头,采购方在供应商选择过程中必须找到合适的优质产品和/或服务提供商。基于上述原因,很难准确选择合适的备选方案。本文的主要贡献是将熵权法、层次分析法(AHP)权重和逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)方法结合成一个合适的多准则决策(MCDM)解决方案。利用熵 - AHP权重对TOPSIS方法进行扩展,并使用熵 - AHP权重代替主观权重。提出了一种新颖的集成熵 - AHP权重的TOPSIS决策模型来选择合适的供应商。最后,以建筑材料供应商的选择为例,通过敏感性分析表明基于熵 - AHP权重的TOPSIS方法的组合能够有效地选择合适的供应商。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/bf9aac7becf3/entropy-22-00259-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/602d544f130e/entropy-22-00259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/17af7ce9167e/entropy-22-00259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/7068d8ca354b/entropy-22-00259-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/7345788deb23/entropy-22-00259-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/bf9aac7becf3/entropy-22-00259-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/602d544f130e/entropy-22-00259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/17af7ce9167e/entropy-22-00259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/7068d8ca354b/entropy-22-00259-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/7345788deb23/entropy-22-00259-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/7516705/bf9aac7becf3/entropy-22-00259-g005a.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.一种基于熵权-层次分析法加权理想解法的新型建筑材料供应商选择多准则决策模型
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;22(2):259. doi: 10.3390/e22020259.
2
A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection.一种基于网络分析法-熵权法-理想解法的混合多准则决策方法用于建筑材料供应商选择
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Nov 28;23(12):1597. doi: 10.3390/e23121597.
3
Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.综合多准则决策方法解决供应商选择问题:医院案例研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Oct 10;2019:5614892. doi: 10.1155/2019/5614892. eCollection 2019.
4
Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.一种用于ETL软件选择的集成多准则决策AHP-TOPSIS方法的应用。
Springerplus. 2016 Mar 2;5:263. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z. eCollection 2016.
5
Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches.运用多准则决策(MCDM)方法确定苹果树最合适的施肥方法。
Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Nov 20;12(2):1158-1169. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3831. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process.基于混合层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的多准则决策技术在燃油滤清器装配过程中的协作机器人选型
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(4):e26374. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26374. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
7
A Multicriteria Decision-Making Framework for Access Point Selection in Hybrid LiFi/WiFi Networks Using Integrated AHP-VIKOR Technique.基于层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法集成技术的混合可见光通信/无线局域网接入点选择的多准则决策框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;23(3):1312. doi: 10.3390/s23031312.
8
Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms.使用 FMEA 和混合层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的供应链管理中的多准则决策
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;23(8):4041. doi: 10.3390/s23084041.
9
An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.一种用于可持续和有弹性的供应商选择的扩展混合模糊多准则决策模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):37291-37314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17851-2. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
10
A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada.一种改进的逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)应用于加拿大禽流感持续监测中选择合适的筛选方法。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Apr 1;165:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Consumer-Oriented Sensory Evaluation Scale for Pale Lager Beer.面向消费者的淡色贮藏啤酒感官评价量表的开发与验证
Foods. 2025 Aug 15;14(16):2834. doi: 10.3390/foods14162834.
2
Bidirectional decision analysis of online Ride-hailing enterprises based on fuzzy theory and cloud model.基于模糊理论和云模型的在线网约车企业双向决策分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15908-7.
3
Analysis of coupling coordination development and obstacle factors in the water-energy-carbon-ecological environment nexus across China's Yellow River basin.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive Evaluation of Coal-Fired Power Units Using Grey Relational Analysis and a Hybrid Entropy-Based Weighting Method.基于灰色关联分析和混合熵权法的燃煤发电机组综合评价
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Mar 23;20(4):215. doi: 10.3390/e20040215.
2
A comparative approach for ranking contaminated sites based on the risk assessment paradigm using fuzzy PROMETHEE.基于模糊 PROMETHEE 的风险评估范式的污染场地排序比较方法。
Environ Manage. 2009 Nov;44(5):952-67. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9368-7. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
3
Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
中国黄河流域水-能源-碳-生态环境耦合协调发展及障碍因素分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 6;15(1):24106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09234-1.
4
Evaluating and enhancing the service capacity of secondary public hospitals in urban China: a multi-method empirical analysis based on Guangzhou (2019-2023).评估与提升中国城市二级公立医院的服务能力:基于广州(2019 - 2023年)的多方法实证分析
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 12;5:1621018. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1621018. eCollection 2025.
5
A simulation-based empirical study on the role of aviation logistics in driving high-quality and sustainable regional economic development: Focusing on dynamic mechanisms and key factors.基于模拟的航空物流对推动区域经济高质量可持续发展作用的实证研究:聚焦动态机制与关键因素
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0323110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323110. eCollection 2025.
6
Non-customized data asset evaluation based on knowledge graph and value entropy.基于知识图谱和价值熵的非定制数据资产评估
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0316241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316241. eCollection 2025.
7
Effects of coupled application of magnetoelectric activated water and amendments on photosynthetic physiological characteristics and yield of maize in arid regions.磁电活化水与改良剂耦合施用对干旱地区玉米光合生理特性及产量的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 16;15:1497806. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1497806. eCollection 2024.
8
Spatiotemporal dynamic assessment and obstacle analysis of economic resilience in China's marine fisheries.中国海洋渔业经济弹性的时空动态评估与障碍分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27818. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79238-w.
9
Research on optimization of mining methods for broken ore bodies based on interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy sets and TOPSIS-GRA.基于区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊集和TOPSIS-GRA的破碎矿体采矿方法优化研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73814-w.
10
Comprehensive evaluation of the implementation of close-type county medical alliance in Shandong Province using entropy weight TOPSIS method and non-integer rank sum ratio method.采用熵权 TOPSIS 法和非整数秩和比法对山东省紧密型县域医共体实施情况进行综合评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11659-9.
模糊环境下基于层次分析法和理想点法的转运地点选择
Waste Manag. 2008;28(9):1552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019. Epub 2007 Sep 4.