• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模糊环境下基于层次分析法和理想点法的转运地点选择

Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.

作者信息

Onüt Semih, Soner Selin

机构信息

Yildiz Technical University, Mechanical Faculty, Department of Industrial Engineering, Yildiz, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2008;28(9):1552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019
PMID:17768038
Abstract

Site selection is an important issue in waste management. Selection of the appropriate solid waste site requires consideration of multiple alternative solutions and evaluation criteria because of system complexity. Evaluation procedures involve several objectives, and it is often necessary to compromise among possibly conflicting tangible and intangible factors. For these reasons, multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) has been found to be a useful approach to solve this kind of problem. Different MCDM models have been applied to solve this problem. But most of them are basically mathematical and ignore qualitative and often subjective considerations. It is easier for a decision-maker to describe a value for an alternative by using linguistic terms. In the fuzzy-based method, the rating of each alternative is described using linguistic terms, which can also be expressed as triangular fuzzy numbers. Furthermore, there have not been any studies focused on the site selection in waste management using both fuzzy TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) and AHP (analytical hierarchy process) techniques. In this paper, a fuzzy TOPSIS based methodology is applied to solve the solid waste transshipment site selection problem in Istanbul, Turkey. The criteria weights are calculated by using the AHP.

摘要

选址是废物管理中的一个重要问题。由于系统的复杂性,选择合适的固体废物处理场地需要考虑多种替代方案和评估标准。评估程序涉及多个目标,而且通常有必要在可能相互冲突的有形和无形因素之间进行权衡。基于这些原因,多准则决策(MCDM)已被证明是解决这类问题的一种有用方法。不同的MCDM模型已被应用于解决这个问题。但它们大多基本上是数学模型,忽略了定性的、往往是主观的因素。决策者用语言术语来描述一个替代方案的值会更容易。在基于模糊的方法中,每个替代方案的评级用语言术语来描述,这些术语也可以表示为三角模糊数。此外,还没有任何研究同时使用模糊TOPSIS(逼近理想解排序法)和AHP(层次分析法)技术来关注废物管理中的选址问题。本文应用基于模糊TOPSIS的方法来解决土耳其伊斯坦布尔的固体废物转运站选址问题。准则权重通过层次分析法计算得出。

相似文献

1
Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.模糊环境下基于层次分析法和理想点法的转运地点选择
Waste Manag. 2008;28(9):1552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
2
Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China.基于空间信息技术和层次分析法的垃圾填埋场选址:以中国北京为例
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2414-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Apr 18.
3
Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste.模糊多准则处理方法与城市固体废物处置场地选择
Waste Manag. 2010 Aug-Sep;30(8-9):1729-36. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
4
Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.运用创新的利益相关者参与标准权重工具,运用层次分析法对 MSW 设施场地进行排名。
Waste Manag. 2010 Nov;30(11):2370-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 May 4.
5
IFRP: a hybrid interval-parameter fuzzy robust programming approach for waste management planning under uncertainty.IFRP:一种用于不确定性下废物管理规划的混合区间参数模糊鲁棒规划方法。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Jul;84(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
6
Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties.多不确定性下环境管理的区间参数半无限模糊随机混合整数规划方法。
Waste Manag. 2010 Mar;30(3):521-31. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.015. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
7
Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method.基于 VIKOR 的模糊多准则决策方法评估医疗废物处理方法。
Waste Manag. 2013 Dec;33(12):2744-51. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
8
The application of a multi-parameter analysis in choosing the location of a new solid waste landfill in Serbia.多参数分析在塞尔维亚新固体废物填埋场选址中的应用。
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Oct;31(10):1019-27. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13497076. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
9
Municipal solid waste landfill siting using intelligent system.利用智能系统进行城市固体废弃物填埋场选址
Waste Manag. 2006;26(3):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.01.026. Epub 2005 Jul 12.
10
Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.运用改进的 TOPSIS 和 VIKOR 方法进行多准则决策分析,以建立优化的城市固体废物管理模型。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Jan 15;166:109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the physical activity in the EU using a fuzzy hybrid synthetic index and an ordered probit model.运用模糊混合综合指数和有序概率模型衡量欧盟的体育活动情况。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 31;7:1582658. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1582658. eCollection 2025.
2
Location-allocation combining fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for waste to energy facilities siting in developing urban areas: The case study of Lomé, Togo.基于模糊层次分析法的选址-分配模型在发展中城市地区垃圾焚烧发电厂选址中的应用:以多哥洛美市为例
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 3;9(9):e19767. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19767. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Systematic review of MCDM approach applied to the medical case studies of COVID-19: trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, motivations, recommendations, and future directions.
多准则决策方法应用于COVID-19医学案例研究的系统综述:趋势、文献分析、挑战、动机、建议及未来方向
Complex Intell Systems. 2023 Feb 3:1-27. doi: 10.1007/s40747-023-00972-1.
4
Evaluation and prediction of land ecological security in Shenzhen based on DPSIR-TOPSIS-GM(1,1) model.基于 DPSIR-TOPSIS-GM(1,1)模型的深圳市土地生态安全评价与预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 15;17(11):e0265810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265810. eCollection 2022.
5
Human Centered Decision-Making for COVID-19 Testing Center Location Selection: Tamil Nadu-A Case Study.以人为主的新冠肺炎检测中心选址决策:泰米尔纳德邦案例研究
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Mar 10;2022:2048294. doi: 10.1155/2022/2048294. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluating the sustainability of big data centers using the analytic network process and fuzzy TOPSIS.采用网络分析法和模糊 TOPSIS 评价大数据中心的可持续性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(14):17913-17927. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11443-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.一种基于熵权-层次分析法加权理想解法的新型建筑材料供应商选择多准则决策模型
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;22(2):259. doi: 10.3390/e22020259.
8
Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: a case study in Naqadeh, Iran.基于多准则决策技术与地理信息系统集成的垃圾填埋场选址:伊朗纳加德案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Nov 8;191(12):730. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7863-8.
9
A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making.一种用于模糊多准则群体决策的新型基于网络的框架开发。
Springerplus. 2016 May 11;5:601. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2198-1. eCollection 2016.
10
Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.模糊层次分析法与模糊TODIM法在垃圾填埋场选址中的比较
Springerplus. 2016 Apr 22;5:501. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2131-7. eCollection 2016.