• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于网络分析法-熵权法-理想解法的混合多准则决策方法用于建筑材料供应商选择

A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection.

作者信息

Chen Chun-Ho

机构信息

Bachelor Program of Real Estate Investment and Management, Takming University of Science and Technology, No. 56, Sec. 1, Huanshan Rd., Neihu District, Taipei 11451, Taiwan.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2021 Nov 28;23(12):1597. doi: 10.3390/e23121597.

DOI:10.3390/e23121597
PMID:34945903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8699997/
Abstract

This article will tell you how to combine "entropy" in the model to reduce the bias of multi-criteria evaluation. Subjective weights are usually determined by decision makers based on their professional background, experience and knowledge, and other factors. The objective weight is obtained by constructing an evaluation matrix of the information based on the actual information of the evaluation criteria of the scheme, and obtained through multi-step calculations. Different decision-making methods are based on different weight types. Considering only one of the two weights often leads to biased results. In addition, in order to establish an effective supply chain, buyers must find suitable merchants among suppliers that provide quality products and/or services. Based on the above factors, it is difficult to choose a suitable alternative. The main contribution of this paper is to combine analytic network process (ANP), entropy weight and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) to construct a suitable multi-criteria decision (MCDM) model. By means of ANP-entropy weights to extend the TOPSIS method, ANP-entropy weights are used to replace subjective weights. A supplier selection decision-making model based on ANP-entropy TOPSIS is proposed. At last, the sensitivity analysis shows that, taking the selection of building materials suppliers as an example, the hybrid ANP-entropy TOPSIS method can effectively select suitable suppliers.

摘要

本文将告诉你如何在模型中结合“熵”来减少多准则评价的偏差。主观权重通常由决策者根据其专业背景、经验和知识等因素来确定。客观权重是通过基于方案评价准则的实际信息构建信息评价矩阵,并经过多步计算得到的。不同的决策方法基于不同的权重类型。仅考虑两种权重中的一种往往会导致有偏差的结果。此外,为了建立有效的供应链,采购商必须在提供优质产品和/或服务的供应商中找到合适的商家。基于上述因素,很难选择合适的替代方案。本文的主要贡献是将网络分析法(ANP)、熵权法和逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)相结合,构建一个合适的多准则决策(MCDM)模型。通过ANP - 熵权法对TOPSIS方法进行扩展,用ANP - 熵权法代替主观权重。提出了一种基于ANP - 熵权TOPSIS的供应商选择决策模型。最后,敏感性分析表明,以建筑材料供应商的选择为例,混合ANP - 熵权TOPSIS方法能够有效地选择合适的供应商。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/3f1ede2cba92/entropy-23-01597-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/a18bb8f8d617/entropy-23-01597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/85dc0b4b42f2/entropy-23-01597-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/a2fd65bbc279/entropy-23-01597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/1b46e87d50fc/entropy-23-01597-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/0f33221b4d28/entropy-23-01597-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/72ba7eb472b3/entropy-23-01597-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/5ad0c8a039d0/entropy-23-01597-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/822ec4c4aea1/entropy-23-01597-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/3f1ede2cba92/entropy-23-01597-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/a18bb8f8d617/entropy-23-01597-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/85dc0b4b42f2/entropy-23-01597-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/a2fd65bbc279/entropy-23-01597-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/1b46e87d50fc/entropy-23-01597-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/0f33221b4d28/entropy-23-01597-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/72ba7eb472b3/entropy-23-01597-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/5ad0c8a039d0/entropy-23-01597-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/822ec4c4aea1/entropy-23-01597-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8699997/3f1ede2cba92/entropy-23-01597-g009a.jpg

相似文献

1
A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection.一种基于网络分析法-熵权法-理想解法的混合多准则决策方法用于建筑材料供应商选择
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Nov 28;23(12):1597. doi: 10.3390/e23121597.
2
A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.一种基于熵权-层次分析法加权理想解法的新型建筑材料供应商选择多准则决策模型
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;22(2):259. doi: 10.3390/e22020259.
3
Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.可持续供应链合作伙伴选择与订单分配:基于混合模糊 PL-TODIM 的多准则群决策方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0271194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271194. eCollection 2022.
4
A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada.一种改进的逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)应用于加拿大禽流感持续监测中选择合适的筛选方法。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Apr 1;165:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
5
An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.一种用于可持续和有弹性的供应商选择的扩展混合模糊多准则决策模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):37291-37314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17851-2. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.综合多准则决策方法解决供应商选择问题:医院案例研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Oct 10;2019:5614892. doi: 10.1155/2019/5614892. eCollection 2019.
7
Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches.运用多准则决策(MCDM)方法确定苹果树最合适的施肥方法。
Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Nov 20;12(2):1158-1169. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3831. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
A novel drug selection decision support model based on real-world medical data by the hybrid entropic weight TOPSIS method.一种基于混合熵权TOPSIS法的真实世界医学数据的新型药物选择决策支持模型。
Technol Health Care. 2023;31(2):691-703. doi: 10.3233/THC-220355.
9
Natural gas based on combined fuzzy TOPSIS technique and entropy.基于模糊TOPSIS技术和熵的天然气
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 12;10(1):e23391. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23391. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
10
A supplier selection model in pharmaceutical supply chain using PCA, Z-TOPSIS and MILP: A case study.基于 PCA、Z-TOPSIS 和 MILP 的制药供应链供应商选择模型:案例研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0201604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201604. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating and enhancing the service capacity of secondary public hospitals in urban China: a multi-method empirical analysis based on Guangzhou (2019-2023).评估与提升中国城市二级公立医院的服务能力:基于广州(2019 - 2023年)的多方法实证分析
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 12;5:1621018. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1621018. eCollection 2025.
2
Sustainability and circularity assessment of biomass-based energy supply chain.基于生物质的能源供应链的可持续性与循环性评估
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 27;10(19):e38557. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38557. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
3
Optimization of Cockpit Ventilation for Polar Cruise Ships in Combination with Windscreen Defogging and Cabin Comfort Considerations.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.一种基于熵权-层次分析法加权理想解法的新型建筑材料供应商选择多准则决策模型
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;22(2):259. doi: 10.3390/e22020259.
2
Comprehensive Evaluation of Coal-Fired Power Units Using Grey Relational Analysis and a Hybrid Entropy-Based Weighting Method.基于灰色关联分析和混合熵权法的燃煤发电机组综合评价
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Mar 23;20(4):215. doi: 10.3390/e20040215.
3
Controlling air pollution in a city: A perspective from SOAR-PESTLE analysis.
结合挡风玻璃除雾和客舱舒适度考量的极地游轮驾驶舱通风优化
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;24(8):1061. doi: 10.3390/e24081061.
城市空气污染控制:SOAR-PESTLE 分析视角。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Jul;14(4):480-488. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4051. Epub 2018 May 16.
4
A comparative approach for ranking contaminated sites based on the risk assessment paradigm using fuzzy PROMETHEE.基于模糊 PROMETHEE 的风险评估范式的污染场地排序比较方法。
Environ Manage. 2009 Nov;44(5):952-67. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9368-7. Epub 2009 Sep 16.