Division of Otolaryngology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Division of Otolaryngology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul;165(1):197-205. doi: 10.1177/0194599820970950. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
There is limited epidemiological information on swallowing dysfunction (SwD) in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs). Cost, invasiveness, expertise, and resources constrain the repeatability and utility of instrumental diagnostic tests. A parent-reported outcomes (PRO) tool has the potential to mitigate these disadvantages. Hence, we set out to develop and validate a novel PRO tool to assess SwD in OHITs.
A mixed-method study.
Tertiary pediatric center.
We recruited parents of OHITs with SwD and excluded those with a confounding diagnosis (syndromes or neurological impairment). Interviews were conducted and thematically analyzed to extract the relevant domains and items. A similar analytical method was performed on the reports from a systematic review and literature search. Four verification sessions of parents and experts were conducted to maintain rigor. A panel of experts assessed and established the content validity of the items using a modified Delphi technique.
We achieved information saturation after interviewing 10 parents and generated 7 domains with 72 items. Over the course of 3 rounds of modified Delphi content validation, the domains were reduced to 3 (swallowing, breathing, and illness) containing 21 items; a content validity index of 82.1% was achieved.
We validated the content of a new PRO instrument to assess SwD in OHITs. The instrument is composed of 3 primary domains representing 21 items. This tool has the potential to screen for swallowing dysfunction and can assess management outcomes specifically for this population at a community level.
关于健康婴幼儿吞咽功能障碍(SwD)的流行病学信息有限。仪器诊断测试的成本、侵入性、专业性和资源限制了其重复性和实用性。家长报告的结局(PRO)工具具有减轻这些缺点的潜力。因此,我们着手开发和验证一种新的 PRO 工具,以评估健康婴幼儿的吞咽功能障碍。
混合方法研究。
三级儿科中心。
我们招募了吞咽功能障碍的健康婴幼儿的父母,并排除了有混杂诊断(综合征或神经损伤)的父母。进行了访谈并进行了主题分析,以提取相关的领域和项目。对系统评价和文献搜索的报告也采用了类似的分析方法。进行了四轮父母和专家的验证会议,以保持严谨性。一个专家小组使用修改后的 Delphi 技术评估并确定了项目的内容效度。
在采访了 10 位父母后,我们获得了信息饱和,并生成了 7 个领域的 72 个项目。经过 3 轮修改后的 Delphi 内容验证,这些领域被减少到 3 个(吞咽、呼吸和疾病),包含 21 个项目;内容效度指数为 82.1%。
我们验证了一种新的 PRO 工具评估健康婴幼儿吞咽功能障碍的内容。该工具由 3 个主要领域组成,包含 21 个项目。该工具具有筛查吞咽功能障碍的潜力,并可在社区层面专门评估该人群的管理结局。