School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 7;9(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01548-7.
Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are becoming increasingly popular, the application of MBIs with children and adolescents is still in its infancy. Mapping the existing literature is necessary to help guide pediatric mindfulness interventions. Our purpose is to synthesize the evidence of reported MBIs for children and adolescents with and without physical, mental, and cognitive disorders. Accordingly, we aim to identify trends and gaps in the literature, so that we can provide direction to researchers who seek to advance the evidence base for using MBIs in pediatric populations.
Our search strategy will be conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. It will include a comprehensive search of published studies in 7 databases, gray literature, conference proceedings, and citations of selected articles. Two independent reviewers will evaluate all abstracts and full articles that have a pediatric sample (children 2-17 years), use MBIs to promote development or to remediate underlying disorders, and are written in English or French. We will identify the definitions and concepts from MBIs, categorize accepted studies according to etiology and rehabilitation type, describe intervention methodology, and report outcomes of selected studies.
Our review will provide a comprehensive overview of the pediatric mindfulness intervention literature to date, involving a range of mental, cognitive, and physical outcomes for healthy children and adolescents and for those with a variety of disorders in clinical and institutional settings. We will disseminate results to mindfulness practitioners and provide guidance to future pediatric researchers in their development and application of mindfulness interventions, thereby contributing to the scientific understanding of mindfulness for the ultimate betterment of child and adolescent well-being and life-long functioning.
PROSPERO does not accept scoping review protocols.
尽管基于正念的干预(MBIs)越来越受欢迎,但儿童和青少年的 MBIs 应用仍处于起步阶段。绘制现有文献图谱有助于指导儿科正念干预。我们的目的是综合报告的儿童和青少年 MBIs 的证据,包括有和没有身体、心理和认知障碍的。因此,我们旨在确定文献中的趋势和差距,以便为寻求推进儿科人群中使用 MBIs 的证据基础的研究人员提供指导。
我们的搜索策略将遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法学框架进行。它将包括在 7 个数据库、灰色文献、会议记录和选定文章的引文库中全面搜索已发表的研究。两名独立的审查员将评估所有具有儿科样本(2-17 岁儿童)的摘要和全文,这些研究使用 MBIs 来促进发展或纠正潜在障碍,并且是用英语或法语撰写的。我们将确定 MBIs 的定义和概念,根据病因和康复类型对接受的研究进行分类,描述干预方法,并报告选定研究的结果。
我们的综述将提供迄今为止儿科正念干预文献的全面概述,涉及健康儿童和青少年以及在临床和机构环境中患有各种障碍的儿童和青少年的一系列心理、认知和身体结果。我们将向正念从业者传播结果,并为未来的儿科研究人员在他们的正念干预的发展和应用方面提供指导,从而为正念的科学理解做出贡献,最终改善儿童和青少年的福祉和终身功能。
PROSPERO 不接受范围综述方案。