• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较术前预防性抗生素在预防轻中度烧伤患者感染性并发症方面疗效的非劣效性研究。

A non-inferiority study comparing efficacy of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infectious complications in patients with less severe burns.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, 877 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, 877 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.

出版信息

Burns. 2021 Feb;47(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.028. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.028
PMID:33288331
Abstract

While international burn injury guidelines discourage prophylactic antibiotics on admission, current surgery guidelines focusing on antimicrobial prophylaxis place thermal injury under a general plastics procedure umbrella, and require significant evidential extrapolation. The purpose of this study was to determine if withholding systemic antibiotics in patients with <20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns without invasive wound infections and undergo wound excision is non-inferior to patients that receive preoperative antibiotics. Success was defined as lack of graft loss, bacteremia, or surgical site infection. One-thousand and eighty-three patients were screened and 100 patients undergoing 133 operations remained after exclusions. Seventy-four percent were male. Median age and %TBSA was 41 years (30, 55) and 5 (1.5, 8.3), respectively. We found no differences in demographics between patients that did and did not receive preoperative antibiotics. The success rates were 81.7% and 84.3%, respectively. There was one clinically significant bacteremia in each group. Withholding preoperative antibiotics was non-inferior with a percent difference of 2.6 (95% CI; -10.4, 15.6). Patients that did not receive antibiotics were no more likely to incur infection-related complications. In patients with <20% TBSA burns and without active wound infections, withholding preoperative systemic antibiotics will preserve unneeded antimicrobial exposure without increasing risk of infection-related complications.

摘要

尽管国际烧伤损伤指南不鼓励入院时预防性使用抗生素,但目前侧重于抗菌预防的手术指南将热损伤归入一般塑料手术范畴,并需要大量的证据外推。本研究旨在确定在没有侵袭性伤口感染且接受伤口切除的 <20% 总体表面积(TBSA)烧伤患者中,不使用全身性抗生素是否与接受术前抗生素的患者相比无差异。成功定义为无移植物丢失、菌血症或手术部位感染。对 1083 名患者进行了筛选,排除后有 100 名患者进行了 133 次手术。其中 74%为男性。中位年龄和 TBSA%分别为 41 岁(30, 55)和 5(1.5, 8.3)。我们发现接受和不接受术前抗生素的患者在人口统计学方面没有差异。成功率分别为 81.7%和 84.3%。两组各有一例临床显著菌血症。不使用术前抗生素具有非劣效性,差异百分比为 2.6(95%CI;-10.4, 15.6)。不使用抗生素的患者发生感染相关并发症的可能性更小。在 <20% TBSA 烧伤且无活动性伤口感染的患者中,不使用术前全身性抗生素可避免不必要的抗菌药物暴露,而不会增加感染相关并发症的风险。

相似文献

1
A non-inferiority study comparing efficacy of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infectious complications in patients with less severe burns.一项比较术前预防性抗生素在预防轻中度烧伤患者感染性并发症方面疗效的非劣效性研究。
Burns. 2021 Feb;47(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.028. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
The A2B trial, antibiotic prophylaxis for excision-graft surgery in burn patients: a multicenter randomized double-blind study.A2B 试验,烧伤患者切除-植皮手术的抗生素预防:一项多中心随机双盲研究。
Trials. 2020 Nov 25;21(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04894-y.
3
Does compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric simple appendicitis matter?小儿单纯性阑尾炎中抗生素预防用药的依从性重要吗?
J Surg Res. 2017 Aug;216:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis in burn patients: systematic review.烧伤患者的全身性抗菌预防:系统评价。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Oct;97(2):105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
5
Antimicrobial susceptibility of biliary stents do not predict infectious complications after whipple.胆道支架的抗菌药敏试验结果不能预测胰十二指肠切除术后的感染并发症。
Surgery. 2020 Sep;168(3):457-461. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.025. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Evaluating the use of preoperative antibiotics in pediatric orthopaedic surgery.评估小儿骨科手术中术前抗生素的使用情况。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Oct-Nov;32(7):737-40. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318269543b.
7
[Advances in the research of early systemic use of prophylactic antibiotics in severe burns].[严重烧伤早期全身预防性使用抗生素的研究进展]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;31(3):233-5.
8
Prophylactic Antibiotics May Improve Outcome in Patients With Severe Burns Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: Propensity Score Analysis of a Japanese Nationwide Database.预防性抗生素可能改善需要机械通气的重度烧伤患者的预后:基于日本全国数据库的倾向评分分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 1;62(1):60-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ763. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
9
"SCIP"ping antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in trauma: The consequences of noncompliance.创伤中“SCIP”抗生素预防指南的实施情况:不遵守的后果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):452-6; discussion 456. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825ff670.
10
What Is the Impact of Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Tissue Expander Infection Rates in Pediatric Patients?术后抗生素预防对小儿患者组织扩张器感染率的影响是什么?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Aug 1;148(2):236e-242e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008195.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Antibiotic Prophylaxis Necessary in Small (≤20% TBSA) Burn Excisions? A Retrospective Study.小面积(≤20% 体表面积)烧伤清创术中是否需要预防性使用抗生素?一项回顾性研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jun 21;10(6):e4388. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004388. eCollection 2022 Jun.