Suppr超能文献

一项比较术前预防性抗生素在预防轻中度烧伤患者感染性并发症方面疗效的非劣效性研究。

A non-inferiority study comparing efficacy of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infectious complications in patients with less severe burns.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, 877 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Regional One Health, 877 Jefferson Avenue, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.

出版信息

Burns. 2021 Feb;47(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.028. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

Abstract

While international burn injury guidelines discourage prophylactic antibiotics on admission, current surgery guidelines focusing on antimicrobial prophylaxis place thermal injury under a general plastics procedure umbrella, and require significant evidential extrapolation. The purpose of this study was to determine if withholding systemic antibiotics in patients with <20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns without invasive wound infections and undergo wound excision is non-inferior to patients that receive preoperative antibiotics. Success was defined as lack of graft loss, bacteremia, or surgical site infection. One-thousand and eighty-three patients were screened and 100 patients undergoing 133 operations remained after exclusions. Seventy-four percent were male. Median age and %TBSA was 41 years (30, 55) and 5 (1.5, 8.3), respectively. We found no differences in demographics between patients that did and did not receive preoperative antibiotics. The success rates were 81.7% and 84.3%, respectively. There was one clinically significant bacteremia in each group. Withholding preoperative antibiotics was non-inferior with a percent difference of 2.6 (95% CI; -10.4, 15.6). Patients that did not receive antibiotics were no more likely to incur infection-related complications. In patients with <20% TBSA burns and without active wound infections, withholding preoperative systemic antibiotics will preserve unneeded antimicrobial exposure without increasing risk of infection-related complications.

摘要

尽管国际烧伤损伤指南不鼓励入院时预防性使用抗生素,但目前侧重于抗菌预防的手术指南将热损伤归入一般塑料手术范畴,并需要大量的证据外推。本研究旨在确定在没有侵袭性伤口感染且接受伤口切除的 <20% 总体表面积(TBSA)烧伤患者中,不使用全身性抗生素是否与接受术前抗生素的患者相比无差异。成功定义为无移植物丢失、菌血症或手术部位感染。对 1083 名患者进行了筛选,排除后有 100 名患者进行了 133 次手术。其中 74%为男性。中位年龄和 TBSA%分别为 41 岁(30, 55)和 5(1.5, 8.3)。我们发现接受和不接受术前抗生素的患者在人口统计学方面没有差异。成功率分别为 81.7%和 84.3%。两组各有一例临床显著菌血症。不使用术前抗生素具有非劣效性,差异百分比为 2.6(95%CI;-10.4, 15.6)。不使用抗生素的患者发生感染相关并发症的可能性更小。在 <20% TBSA 烧伤且无活动性伤口感染的患者中,不使用术前全身性抗生素可避免不必要的抗菌药物暴露,而不会增加感染相关并发症的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验