Ha Diep H, Crocombe Leonard A, Khan Shahrukh, Do Loc G
Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Centre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020 Dec 1. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12606.
Evidence suggests there are geographical variations in child oral health and this has prompted research into determinants of that variation. This study aimed to investigate factors attributable to the difference in child oral health between urban and rural areas in Australia.
Data were from the National Child Oral Health Study 2012-14, a population-based study of 5- to 14-year-old children, who underwent oral epidemiological examinations by trained examiners. Caries prevalence (dmfs/DMFS > 0) and experience (dmfs/DMFS count) in the primary dentition (5- to 8-year-old) and permanent dentition (9- to 14-year-old) were calculated. Children were grouped by residential location (urban or rural areas). A parental questionnaire collected information on family socio-economic factors, and individual health behaviours (dental access, sugar consumption and toothbrushing). Residential history was used to calculate lifetime exposure to water fluoridation (WF). Analyses were weighted to produce population-representative estimates. The primary outcomes were assessed separately for the two groups in regression models with robust standard error estimation to estimate prevalence ratios and mean ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. Population Attributable Fractions were calculated using the population distribution of the exposures and their adjusted estimates.
10 581 5- to 8-year-old and 14 041 9- to 14-year-old children were included. Caries prevalence was higher in rural than in urban areas. In multivariable models, exposure to fluoridation, reason for dental visit and consumption of sugary beverages were consistently associated with caries prevalence and experience. WF coverage attributed to differences in caries prevalence (10% vs 21%) and experience (14% vs 35%) in the permanent dentition. High consumption of sugary beverages attributed to a higher primary and permanent dental caries experience in rural than in urban areas. Dental access was also attributed to the differences between the two areas.
Factors at both community and individual levels attributed to the observed differences in child caries prevalence and experience between urban and rural areas.
有证据表明儿童口腔健康存在地域差异,这促使人们对这种差异的决定因素展开研究。本研究旨在调查澳大利亚城乡儿童口腔健康差异的归因因素。
数据来自2012 - 2014年全国儿童口腔健康研究,这是一项针对5至14岁儿童的基于人群的研究,由经过培训的检查人员进行口腔流行病学检查。计算了乳牙列(5至8岁)和恒牙列(9至14岁)的龋病患病率(dmfs/DMFS > 0)和患病经历(dmfs/DMFS计数)。儿童按居住地点(城市或农村地区)分组。通过家长问卷收集有关家庭社会经济因素以及个人健康行为(看牙医情况、糖摄入量和刷牙情况)的信息。利用居住史计算终生氟化物水含氟量(WF)暴露情况。分析进行了加权处理以得出具有人群代表性的估计值。在回归模型中,对两组分别评估主要结果,并采用稳健标准误差估计来估计患病率比和均值比及其95%置信区间。使用暴露因素的人群分布及其调整后的估计值计算人群归因分数。
纳入了10581名5至8岁儿童和14041名9至14岁儿童。农村地区的龋病患病率高于城市地区。在多变量模型中,氟化物水含氟量暴露、看牙医的原因以及含糖饮料的摄入量始终与龋病患病率和患病经历相关。恒牙列中龋病患病率(10%对21%)和患病经历(14%对35%)的差异归因于氟化物水含氟量覆盖情况。农村地区含糖饮料的高摄入量归因于乳牙和恒牙龋齿患病经历均高于城市地区。看牙医情况也归因于两个地区之间的差异。
社区和个体层面的因素导致了城乡儿童龋病患病率和患病经历的观察差异。