• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物种对全球性污染物的敏感性:对人为噪声响应的声音信号的荟萃分析。

Species sensitivities to a global pollutant: A meta-analysis on acoustic signals in response to anthropogenic noise.

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Feb;27(3):675-688. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15428. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.15428
PMID:33289307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7839775/
Abstract

Anthropogenically driven environmental changes affect our planet at an unprecedented rate. Among these changes are those in the acoustic environment caused by anthropogenic noise, which can affect both animals and humans. In many species, acoustic communication plays a crucial role to maintain social relationships by exchanging information via acoustic signals. However, how species relying on acoustic communication differ in their adjustments to anthropogenic noise is little understood. Yet, this is crucial because protecting species effectively depends on our capability to predict how species differ in their response to human-induced environmental changes. Using a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis, we quantified differences in adjustments of acoustic signals to anthropogenic noise among species. The effect sizes included in the analysis were obtained from noise exposure experiments, as only carefully controlled experiments allow to establish cause-and-effect relationships. We found that animals changed acoustic signals when exposed to noise, but the magnitude and the direction of adjustments differed among species. Given the importance of communication in the animal kingdom, these adjustments can affect social relationships in many species. The diversity of responses among species highlights the necessity to assess the effect of environmental stressors not only for a few species, because an effect may be positive in one species but negative in another depending on the species' biology. Thus, an effective conservation approach to protect different species is to preserve natural soundscapes of ecosystems to which species have adapted to by reducing or mitigating the emission of anthropogenic noise into the environment.

摘要

人为驱动的环境变化以前所未有的速度影响着我们的星球。这些变化包括人为噪声引起的声环境变化,它会影响动物和人类。在许多物种中,声音交流通过声信号来交换信息,对维持社会关系起着至关重要的作用。然而,对于依赖声音交流的物种如何对人为噪声做出不同的调整,我们还知之甚少。然而,这一点至关重要,因为有效保护物种取决于我们预测物种对人类引起的环境变化的反应差异的能力。通过基于系统发育的荟萃分析,我们量化了物种对人为噪声的声音信号调整的差异。分析中包含的效应大小是从噪声暴露实验中获得的,因为只有经过精心控制的实验才能建立因果关系。我们发现,动物在暴露于噪声时会改变声音信号,但物种之间的调整幅度和方向存在差异。鉴于通讯在动物王国中的重要性,这些调整会影响许多物种的社会关系。物种之间反应的多样性凸显了评估环境胁迫物影响的必要性,不仅是针对少数几个物种,因为一个物种的影响可能是积极的,而另一个物种的影响可能是消极的,这取决于物种的生物学特性。因此,保护不同物种的有效保护方法是通过减少或减轻人为噪声向环境中的排放来保护物种适应的生态系统的自然声景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/f0e077dd5383/GCB-27-675-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/c8c60b8b5e77/GCB-27-675-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/869109102a5c/GCB-27-675-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/5e12976d398e/GCB-27-675-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/a5fcba754269/GCB-27-675-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/f161e39365e3/GCB-27-675-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/c33e02a45202/GCB-27-675-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/f0e077dd5383/GCB-27-675-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/c8c60b8b5e77/GCB-27-675-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/869109102a5c/GCB-27-675-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/5e12976d398e/GCB-27-675-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/a5fcba754269/GCB-27-675-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/f161e39365e3/GCB-27-675-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/c33e02a45202/GCB-27-675-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19a/7839775/f0e077dd5383/GCB-27-675-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Species sensitivities to a global pollutant: A meta-analysis on acoustic signals in response to anthropogenic noise.物种对全球性污染物的敏感性:对人为噪声响应的声音信号的荟萃分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Feb;27(3):675-688. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15428. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems.水生噪声污染:对个体、种群和生态系统的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0839.
3
Vocal traits and diet explain avian sensitivities to anthropogenic noise.鸣禽特征和饮食解释了鸟类对人为噪声的敏感程度。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 May;21(5):1809-20. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12862. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
4
Anthropogenic noise affects behavior across sensory modalities.人为噪声会影响各种感官模态下的行为。
Am Nat. 2014 Oct;184(4):E93-100. doi: 10.1086/677545. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
5
MASE: An Instrument Designed to Record Underwater Soundscape.MASE:一种用于记录水下声音景观的仪器。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 29;22(9):3404. doi: 10.3390/s22093404.
6
Anthropogenic noise alters dwarf mongoose responses to heterospecific alarm calls.人为噪音会改变矮猫鼬对异种警报叫声的反应。
Environ Pollut. 2017 Apr;223:476-483. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.049. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
Patterns of Song across Natural and Anthropogenic Soundscapes Suggest That White-Crowned Sparrows Minimize Acoustic Masking and Maximize Signal Content.自然和人为声景中的鸣唱模式表明,白冠雀会将声学掩蔽降至最低,并使信号内容最大化。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 29;11(4):e0154456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154456. eCollection 2016.
8
What is Known-and not Known-About Acoustic Communication in an Urban Soundscape.关于城市声景中的声学通讯,有哪些已知和未知的情况。
Integr Comp Biol. 2021 Nov 17;61(5):1783-1794. doi: 10.1093/icb/icab131.
9
A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife.二十年来有关噪声对野生动物影响的研究综述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Nov;91(4):982-1005. doi: 10.1111/brv.12207. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
10
Eastern Bluebirds Alter their Song in Response to Anthropogenic Changes in the Acoustic Environment.东部蓝鸲会根据声学环境中的人为变化改变它们的歌声。
Integr Comp Biol. 2015 Sep;55(3):418-31. doi: 10.1093/icb/icv070. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-breeding European robins adjust their song in noisy environments.非繁殖期的欧洲知更鸟会在嘈杂环境中调整它们的歌声。
Behav Ecol. 2025 Jun 12;36(4):araf070. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araf070. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Anthropogenic disturbance affects calling and collective behaviour in corvid roosts.人为干扰会影响鸦科鸟类栖息地的鸣叫和群体行为。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jul 8;379(1905):20230185. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0185. Epub 2024 May 20.
3
Anthropogenic noise may impair the mating behaviour of the Shore Crab Carcinus Maenas.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of anthropogenic noise on animals: a meta-analysis.人为噪声对动物的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Biol Lett. 2019 Nov 29;15(11):20190649. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0649. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
2
Meta-analysis challenges a textbook example of status signalling and demonstrates publication bias.元分析挑战了一个教科书般的地位信号传递的例子,并证明了发表偏倚的存在。
Elife. 2018 Nov 13;7:e37385. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37385.
3
Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis.人格与认知的关系:一项元分析。
人为噪声可能会损害滨蟹的交配行为。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276889. eCollection 2022.
4
A meta-analysis on the evolution of the Lombard effect reveals that amplitude adjustments are a widespread vertebrate mechanism.元分析揭示,伦巴第效应的演变表明,幅度调整是一种广泛存在的脊椎动物机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2117809119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117809119. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
Airport noise disturbs foraging behavior of Japanese pipistrelle bats.机场噪音干扰日本伏翼蝙蝠的觅食行为。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Jun 12;12(6):e8976. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8976. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0282.
4
Higher songs of city birds may not be an individual response to noise.城市鸟类较高的歌声可能并非对噪音的个体反应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 16;284(1860). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0602.
5
Developmental temperatures and phenotypic plasticity in reptiles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.爬行动物的发育温度和表型可塑性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Feb;93(1):72-97. doi: 10.1111/brv.12333. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists.Meta分析的Meta评估:生物学家的十个评估问题
BMC Biol. 2017 Mar 3;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0357-7.
7
Basics of meta-analysis: I is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity.荟萃分析基础:I 不是异质性的绝对度量。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1230. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
Meta-analysis of magnitudes, differences and variation in evolutionary parameters.进化参数的大小、差异和变异的荟萃分析。
J Evol Biol. 2016 Oct;29(10):1882-1904. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12950.
9
Rejoinder: Further considerations for meta-analysis of transformed quantities such as absolute values.回应:对绝对值等变换量进行荟萃分析的进一步思考。
J Evol Biol. 2016 Oct;29(10):1922-1931. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12951.
10
Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems.水生噪声污染:对个体、种群和生态系统的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0839.