Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California.
Health Commun. 2022 May;37(5):525-534. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1855744. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
One of the greatest challenges in health communication is to persuade people to enact behavior whose consequences lie in the distant future. Could the persuasiveness of a health message be increased by highlighting future regret that one may experience? Using a 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) x 3 (temporal thinking: future-thinking vs. past-thinking vs. no-thinking) factorial design, this study tested the relative effectiveness of message framing and temporal thinking before exposure to a message promoting HPV vaccination. Results showed that having an opportunity to think about one's future and reading loss-framed message were both effective in producing stronger anticipated regret of not taking HPV vaccination. Anticipated regret, in turn, led to more favorable attitudes and greater intentions to take HPV vaccination. Interaction effects were observed such that gain-framed message combined with future-thinking produced the most favorable attitudes toward HPV vaccination. Potential explanations for these findings are offered, and their implications are discussed.
健康传播中最大的挑战之一是说服人们采取行为,而这些行为的后果却存在于遥远的未来。通过强调人们可能会经历的未来遗憾,是否可以提高健康信息的说服力?本研究采用 2(框架:收益与损失)x3(时间思维:未来思维、过去思维与无思维)因子设计,在接触促进 HPV 疫苗接种的信息之前,测试了信息框架和时间思维的相对有效性。结果表明,有机会思考自己的未来和阅读损失框架的信息都能有效地产生更强烈的遗憾感,即如果不接种 HPV 疫苗。而这种遗憾感又会导致对 HPV 疫苗接种的更有利的态度和更大的接种意愿。观察到了交互效应,即收益框架与未来思维相结合会产生对 HPV 疫苗接种最有利的态度。对这些发现提供了潜在的解释,并讨论了其意义。