• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价支抗颏兜式 Forsus 疲劳抵抗矫治器在骨性 II 类错(牙合)生长期患者中的应用。

Evaluation of the splint-supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):9-21. doi: 10.2319/040320-250.1.

DOI:10.2319/040320-250.1
PMID:33289779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8032290/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD), supported with bimaxillary splints, in treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 46 skeletal Class II females who received either conventional Forsus alone (FFRD group) (15 patients, 12.54 ± 0.90 years), FFRD and bimaxillary splints (splint-FFRD group) (15 patients, 12.29 ± 0.82 years), or were untreated controls (16 subjects, 12.1 ± 0.9 years) were retrieved from previous clinical trials. FFRD was inserted onto the mandibular archwire in the FFRD group after leveling and alignment with multibracket appliances. In the splint-FFRD group, Forsus was inserted between fixed maxillary and mandibular splints. Treatment continued until reaching an edge-to-edge incisor relationship.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups failed to induce significant mandibular skeletal effects compared to the normal growth exhibited by untreated controls. The splint-FFRD group showed significant reduction of SNA (-0.88° ± 0.51°) and ANB (-1.36° ± 0.87°). The mandibular incisors showed significant proclination in the FFRD (9.17° ± 2.42°) and splint-FFRD groups (7.06° ± 3.34°).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly proposed splint-supported FFRD was equally effective as the conventional FFRD in treatment of Class II malocclusion with dento-alveolar changes and additional maxillary restricting effect. It has an additional advantage of immediate initiation of the Class II correction.

摘要

目的

评估 Forsus 疲劳阻力装置(FFRD)与双颌夹板联合使用治疗骨性 II 类错[牙合]畸形的效果。

材料和方法

从之前的临床试验中检索了 46 名接受传统 Forsus 单独治疗(FFRD 组)(15 例,12.54 ± 0.90 岁)、FFRD 和双颌夹板(夹板-FFRD 组)(15 例,12.29 ± 0.82 岁)或未接受治疗的对照组(16 例,12.1 ± 0.9 岁)的女性骨骼 II 类患者的数据。FFRD 组在使用多托槽矫治器排齐整平下颌弓丝后插入下颌弓丝。在夹板-FFRD 组中,Forsus 被插入固定的上颌和下颌夹板之间。治疗持续到达到尖牙对刃关系。

结果

与未经治疗的对照组所表现出的正常生长相比,两组治疗均未能引起明显的下颌骨骼效应。夹板-FFRD 组的 SNA(-0.88° ± 0.51°)和 ANB(-1.36° ± 0.87°)显著减小。下颌切牙在 FFRD(9.17° ± 2.42°)和夹板-FFRD 组(7.06° ± 3.34°)中表现出明显的前倾。

结论

新提出的夹板支持 FFRD 在治疗 II 类错[牙合]畸形伴牙牙槽变化和额外的上颌限制作用方面与传统 FFRD 同样有效。它还有一个额外的优势,即可以立即开始进行 II 类矫正。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the splint-supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects.评价支抗颏兜式 Forsus 疲劳抵抗矫治器在骨性 II 类错(牙合)生长期患者中的应用。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):9-21. doi: 10.2319/040320-250.1.
2
Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: .评价微型板锚定 Forsus 耐疲劳矫治器在骨骼 II 类生长患者中的应用:
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):391-403. doi: 10.2319/062018-468.1. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
3
Skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant device for correction of Class II malocclusions-A systematic review and meta-analysis.骨骼锚定 Forsus 疲劳阻力装置矫正 II 类错颌畸形的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12414. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Is there any enhanced treatment effect on class II growing patients when Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device is reinforced by either miniplates or miniscrews? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在使用微型钢板或微螺钉增强 Forsus 疲劳阻力装置时,是否会对生长 II 类患者有增强的治疗效果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthod. 2021 Mar;19(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion.使用插入下颌骨联合处的微型钢板评估骨骼锚固式Forsus FRD的效果:治疗安氏II类错牙合的一种新方法。
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):413-9. doi: 10.2319/051314-345.1. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
6
Comparison of patient acceptance of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device with and without mini-implant anchorage: a randomized controlled trial.使用和不使用微型种植体支抗的情况下患者对Forsus抗疲劳矫治器的接受度比较:一项随机对照试验
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Nov;148(5):755-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.015.
7
Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial.微型种植体支抗Forsus抗疲劳装置的三维效应:一项随机对照试验。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):292-305. doi: 10.2319/012515-55.1. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Long-term effects of the Forsus Device in Class II division I patients treated at pre-peak, peak, and post-peak growth periods: A retrospective study.《Forsus 装置治疗生长前期、高峰期和生长后期 Class II 1 分类错(牙合)患者的长期疗效:一项回顾性研究》。
Int Orthod. 2020 Sep;18(3):451-460. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
9
Treatment effects of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: A retrospective clinical study.骨骼锚固式Forsus FRD EZ矫治器和Herbst矫治器的治疗效果:一项回顾性临床研究。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):306-14. doi: 10.2319/040315-225.1. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Management of skeletal class II malocclusion using bimaxillary skeletal anchorage supported fixed functional appliances : A novel technique.使用双颌骨支抗支持的固定功能性矫治器治疗骨性 II 类错[牙合]畸形:一种新方法。
J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Jan;82(1):42-53. doi: 10.1007/s00056-020-00239-1. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: .评价微型板锚定 Forsus 耐疲劳矫治器在骨骼 II 类生长患者中的应用:
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):391-403. doi: 10.2319/062018-468.1. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
2
Fixed functional appliances with multibracket appliances have no skeletal effect on the mandible: A systematic review and meta-analysis.固定功能矫治器联合多托槽矫治器对下颌骨无骨骼效应:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):612-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.023.
3
Comparison of patient acceptance of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device with and without mini-implant anchorage: a randomized controlled trial.使用和不使用微型种植体支抗的情况下患者对Forsus抗疲劳矫治器的接受度比较:一项随机对照试验
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Nov;148(5):755-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.015.
4
Rapid maxillary expansion effects in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review.快速上颌扩弓对安氏II类错牙合的影响:一项系统评价
Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov;85(6):1070-9. doi: 10.2319/102514-768.1.
5
Dental and skeletal changes in mild to moderate Class II malocclusions treated by either a Twin-block or Xbow appliance followed by full fixed orthodontic treatment.采用双阻板矫治器或X型弓矫治器治疗轻至中度安氏II类错牙合,随后进行全固定正畸治疗后的牙齿和骨骼变化。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov;85(6):997-1002. doi: 10.2319/092814-696.1. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.固定功能矫治器治疗安氏II类错颌畸形患者的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Apr;38(2):113-26. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv034. Epub 2015 May 19.
7
Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control.丙烯酸夹板式Herbst矫治器与丙烯酸夹板式微螺钉Herbst矫治器在下颌切牙前倾控制方面的比较。
Int J Dent. 2014;2014:173187. doi: 10.1155/2014/173187. Epub 2014 May 19.
8
Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients.Forsus抗疲劳矫治器在生长期患者Ⅱ类错颌综合矫治中的积极治疗效果。
Korean J Orthod. 2014 May;44(3):136-42. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.3.136. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
Incisor inclination changes produced by two compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions.两种免控型Ⅱ类矫正方案治疗轻中度Ⅱ类错颌畸形对切牙倾斜度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):431-6. doi: 10.2319/062712-528.1. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
10
Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.比较 Forsus 疲劳阻力装置治疗与骨骼成熟度的关系:头影测量和磁共振成像研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):616-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.018.