Suppr超能文献

微型种植体支抗Forsus抗疲劳装置的三维效应:一项随机对照试验。

Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Elkordy Sherif A, Abouelezz Amr M, Fayed Mona M Salah, Attia Khaled H, Ishaq Ramy Abdul Rahman, Mostafa Yehya A

机构信息

a  Associate Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

b  Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):292-305. doi: 10.2319/012515-55.1. Epub 2015 May 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To detect three-dimensionally the effects of using mini-implant anchorage with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample comprised 43 skeletal Class II females with deficient mandibles. They were randomly allocated into three groups: 16 patients (13.25 ± 1.12 years) received FFRD alone (Forsus group), 15 subjects (13.07 ± 1.41 years) received FFRD and mini-implants (FMI group), and 12 subjects (12.71 ± 1.44 years) were in the untreated control group. Three-dimensional analyses of cone beam computed tomographic images were completed, and the data were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Class I relationship and overjet correction were achieved in 88% of the cases. None of the two treatment groups showed significant mandibular skeletal effects. In the FMI group, significant headgear effect, decrease in maxillary width, and increase in the lower facial height were noted. In the FMI group, retroclination of maxillary incisors and distalization of maxillary molars were significantly higher. Proclination and intrusion of mandibular incisors were significantly greater in the Forsus group.

CONCLUSIONS

FFRD resulted in Class II correction mainly through dentoalveolar effects and with minimal skeletal effects. Utilization of mini-implant anchorage effectively reduced the unfavorable proclination and intrusion of mandibular incisors but did not produce additional skeletal effects.

摘要

目的

三维检测使用微型种植体支抗联合Forsus抗疲劳装置(FFRD)的效果。

材料与方法

样本包括43名下颌骨发育不足的骨骼型II类女性。她们被随机分为三组:16例患者(13.25±1.12岁)仅接受FFRD治疗(Forsus组),15名受试者(13.07±1.41岁)接受FFRD和微型种植体治疗(FMI组),12名受试者(12.71±1.44岁)为未治疗的对照组。完成锥形束计算机断层扫描图像的三维分析,并对数据进行统计分析。

结果

88%的病例实现了I类关系和覆盖纠正。两个治疗组均未显示出明显的下颌骨骨骼效应。在FMI组中,观察到明显的头帽效应、上颌宽度减小和面部下高度增加。在FMI组中,上颌切牙的后倾和上颌磨牙的远中移动明显更高。Forsus组中下颌切牙的前倾和内收明显更大。

结论

FFRD主要通过牙槽效应实现II类错牙合的纠正,骨骼效应最小。使用微型种植体支抗有效地减少了下颌切牙不利的前倾和内收,但未产生额外的骨骼效应。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial.
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):292-305. doi: 10.2319/012515-55.1. Epub 2015 May 19.
2
Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: .
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):391-403. doi: 10.2319/062018-468.1. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
7
9
Treatment of Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial.
Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):692-701. doi: 10.2319/110717-760.1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Treatment effects of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: A retrospective clinical study.
Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):306-14. doi: 10.2319/040315-225.1. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

8
Treatment efficiency of activator and skeletal anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device appliances.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1505-1512. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03458-3. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: .
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):391-403. doi: 10.2319/062018-468.1. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review.
Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):132-140. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126269.
2
Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients.
Korean J Orthod. 2014 May;44(3):136-42. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.3.136. Epub 2014 May 19.
3
Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions.
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Mar;19(2):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1237-y. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
4
[Skeletal Class II treatment with the miniscrew-anchored Herbst].
Orthod Fr. 2013 Dec;84(4):307-18. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2013070. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
5
Comparison between Herbst appliances with or without miniscrew anchorage.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Dec;9(Suppl 2):S216-21. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.109762.
6
Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):76-87. doi: 10.2319/032613-240.1. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
7
Positional guidelines for orthodontic mini-implant placement in the anterior alveolar region: a systematic review.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):470-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2659.
9
The miniscrew Herbst.
J Clin Orthod. 2012 Jul;46(7):399-405; quiz 437-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验