Department of Physical Education, College of Sciences in Education, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
International Olympic Committee Research Centre Korea, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 4;17(23):9061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239061.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate whether neurocognitive evaluation can confirm the association between neurocognitive level and postural control and to analyze the relationship between neurocognitive level and acute musculoskeletal injury in male non-net sports athletes. Seventy-seven male non-net sports athletes participated in this study. The Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) were used for testing; we collected data related to injury history for six months after testing. Pearson's correlation analysis, logistic regression, and the independent sample -test were used for statistical analysis. The correlation between SAC and SEBT results was weak to moderate ( < 0.05). Eleven of the seventy-seven participants experienced acute lower limb injuries. SAC, LESS, BESS, and SEBT results have no effect on the occurrence of acute lower extremity injuries ( > 0.05) and were not statistically different between the injured and non-injured groups ( > 0.05). Therefore, using the SAC score alone to determine the risk factor of lower extremity injuries, except in the use of assessment after a concussion, should be cautioned against.
本研究旨在验证神经认知评估是否能证实神经认知水平与姿势控制之间的关联，并分析神经认知水平与男性非接触性运动运动员急性肌肉骨骼损伤之间的关系。本研究纳入了 77 名男性非接触性运动运动员。使用标准认知评估（SAC）、落地错误评分系统（LESS）、平衡错误评分系统（BESS）和星形偏移平衡测试（SEBT）进行测试；测试后收集了与损伤史相关的 6 个月的数据。采用 Pearson 相关分析、逻辑回归和独立样本 t 检验进行统计学分析。SAC 和 SEBT 结果之间的相关性为弱至中度（<0.05）。77 名参与者中有 11 人发生急性下肢损伤。SAC、LESS、BESS 和 SEBT 结果对急性下肢损伤的发生无影响（>0.05），且损伤组和未损伤组之间无统计学差异（>0.05）。因此，除了在脑震荡后使用评估外，单独使用 SAC 评分来确定下肢损伤的风险因素应谨慎。
