Suppr超能文献

用于诊断和监测运动相关脑震荡的评估量表综述

Review of Assessment Scales for Diagnosing and Monitoring Sports-related Concussion.

作者信息

Dessy Alexa M, Yuk Frank J, Maniya Akbar Y, Gometz Alex, Rasouli Jonathan J, Lovell Mark R, Choudhri Tanvir F

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Medical Center.

Concussion Management of New York, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

出版信息

Cureus. 2017 Dec 7;9(12):e1922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1922.

Abstract

Sports-related concussion has emerged as a public health crisis due to increased diagnosis of the condition and increased participation in organized and recreational athletics worldwide. Under-recognition of concussions can lead to premature clearance for athletic participation, leaving athletes vulnerable to repeat injury and subsequent short- and long-term complications. There is overwhelming evidence that assessment and management of sports-related concussions should involve a multifaceted approach. A number of assessment criteria have been developed for this purpose. It is important to understand the available and emerging diagnostic testing modalities for sports-related concussions. The most commonly used tools for evaluating individuals with concussion are the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Standard Assessment of Concussion (SAC), Standard Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT3), and the most recognized computerized neurocognitive test, the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT). The strengths and limitations of each of these tools, and the Concussion Resolution Index (CRI), CogSport, and King-Devick tests were evaluated. Based on the data, it appears that the most sensitive and specific of these is the ImPACT test. Additionally, the King-Devick test is an effective adjunct due to its ability to test eye movements and brainstem function.

摘要

由于全球范围内对该病症的诊断增加以及参与有组织和娱乐性体育运动的人数增多,与运动相关的脑震荡已成为一场公共卫生危机。对脑震荡认识不足可能导致过早批准运动员参加比赛,使运动员容易再次受伤以及出现随后的短期和长期并发症。有大量证据表明,与运动相关的脑震荡的评估和管理应采用多方面的方法。为此已经制定了一些评估标准。了解与运动相关的脑震荡现有的和新出现的诊断测试方式很重要。评估脑震荡患者最常用的工具是脑震荡后症状量表(PCSS)、脑震荡标准评估(SAC)、脑震荡标准评估工具(SCAT3),以及最知名的计算机化神经认知测试——脑震荡后即刻评估和认知测试(ImPACT)。对这些工具以及脑震荡恢复指数(CRI)、CogSport和King-Devick测试的优势和局限性进行了评估。根据数据来看,其中最敏感和特异的似乎是ImPACT测试。此外,King-Devick测试由于能够测试眼球运动和脑干功能,是一种有效的辅助测试。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Two-year Test-Retest Reliability of ImPACT in High School Athletes.ImPACT在高中运动员中的两年重测信度
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Feb;31(1):105-11. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv066. Epub 2015 Nov 15.
4
Concussion: current concepts in diagnosis and management.脑震荡:当前的诊断和管理概念。
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;37(3):133-9. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31829f7460.
6
ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?ImPact 测试重测信度:可靠不可靠?
J Athl Train. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):506-11. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.09. Epub 2013 May 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验