Love Beverly, Henderson Juliet, Johnson Amy, Stephens-Lewis Danielle, Gadd David, Radcliffe Polly, Gilchrist Elizabeth, Gilchrist Gail
King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
The University of Edinburgh, Edinbrugh, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2021 Mar;31(4):767-777. doi: 10.1177/1049732320975722. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Undertaking qualitative dyad or couple interviews involving intimate partner abuse and substance use presents considerable ethical, safeguarding, and theoretical challenges throughout the research process from recruitment to conducting interviews and analysis. These challenges and how they were managed are outlined using the experience from a qualitative study of 14 heterosexual "couples" that explored the complex interplay between intimate partner abuse and substance use. Managing these challenges for participants, their families, and researchers included the use of safeguarding protocols and procedures to manage risk and the provision of clinical support for experienced researchers. Researchers often felt drawn into the conflicts and complex dynamics of opposing accounts from the male and females' relationship which could be emotionally and methodologically taxing. Researchers discussing their analysis and felt experiences with each other provided a reflexive space to manage emotions and stay close to the theoretical underpinnings.
开展涉及亲密伴侣虐待和物质使用的定性二元或夫妻访谈,在从招募到进行访谈及分析的整个研究过程中,会带来相当多的伦理、保障和理论挑战。本文利用一项对14对异性恋“夫妻”的定性研究经验,概述了这些挑战以及应对措施。该研究探讨了亲密伴侣虐待与物质使用之间的复杂相互作用。为参与者、其家人和研究人员应对这些挑战,包括使用保障协议和程序来管理风险,以及为经验丰富的研究人员提供临床支持。研究人员常常感觉陷入了男女关系中相互矛盾的叙述所带来的冲突和复杂动态之中,这在情感和方法上都可能带来压力。研究人员相互讨论他们的分析和感受,提供了一个反思的空间来管理情绪,并贴近理论基础。