暴力研究中的方法学与伦理挑战。
Methodological and ethical challenges in violence research.
作者信息
Fraga Sílvia
机构信息
EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
出版信息
Porto Biomed J. 2016 May-Jun;1(2):77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 1.
Abstract
Violence is a relevant public health issue. It is recognized as a sensitive topic to research and introduces challenges not usually found when dealing with other research topics. Researchers face a major challenge that is how to identify and measure violence as it occurs in the general population. This paper intends to discuss and raise awareness to some of the main methodological and ethical challenges related to violence research.
摘要
暴力是一个相关的公共卫生问题。它被公认为是一个研究敏感话题，并带来了处理其他研究主题时通常不会遇到的挑战。研究人员面临的一个主要挑战是如何识别和衡量普通人群中发生的暴力行为。本文旨在讨论并提高对暴力研究相关的一些主要方法和伦理挑战的认识。
相似文献
1
Methodological and ethical challenges in violence research.暴力研究中的方法学与伦理挑战。
Porto Biomed J. 2016 May-Jun;1(2):77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 1.
2
[Violence and health: theoretical, methodological, and ethical contributions from studies on violence against women].《暴力与健康：针对妇女暴力行为研究的理论、方法及伦理贡献》
Cad Saude Publica. 2009;25 Suppl 2:S205-16. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009001400003.
3
Ethical and methodological issues in conducting research on gender-based violence in Southern Africa.在南部非洲开展基于性别的暴力研究中的伦理和方法问题。
Reprod Health Matters. 2000 May;8(15):93-103. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(00)90010-7.
4
Methodological and Ethical Challenges in a Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial of a Domestic Violence Intervention.一项家庭暴力干预的基于网络的随机对照试验中的方法学与伦理挑战。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 28;19(3):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7039.
5
Researching health inequalities with Community Researchers: practical, methodological and ethical challenges of an 'inclusive' research approach.与社区研究人员共同研究健康不平等问题：“包容性”研究方法的实践、方法和伦理挑战。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 13;1:9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0009-4. eCollection 2015.
6
Ethical issues in family violence research in healthcare settings.医疗环境中家庭暴力研究的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Feb;21(1):43-52. doi: 10.1177/0969733013486794. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research.见证：家庭暴力研究中的伦理问题。
Lancet. 2002 May 4;359(9317):1599-604. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08521-5.
8
[Epidemiological research on violence against children: Ethical issues].[针对儿童暴力行为的流行病学研究：伦理问题]
Can J Commun Ment Health. 1998 Fall;17(2):79-90.
9
Sexuality Research in Iran: A Focus on Methodological and Ethical Considerations.伊朗的性取向研究：聚焦方法学与伦理考量
Iran J Public Health. 2015 Jul;44(7):979-86.
10
A Delphi approach to reach consensus on primary care guidelines regarding youth violence prevention.一种采用德尔菲法就青少年暴力预防的初级保健指南达成共识的方法。
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):e1109-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2209.
引用本文的文献
1
"I've accepted it because at the end of the day there is nothing, I can do about it": A qualitative study exploring the experiences of women living with the HIV, intimate partner violence and mental health syndemic in Mpumalanga, South Africa.“我已经接受了，因为说到底对此我无能为力”：一项定性研究，探索南非姆普马兰加省感染艾滋病毒、遭受亲密伴侣暴力和心理健康问题并发的女性的经历。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 6;4(5):e0002588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002588. eCollection 2024.
2
"Children Are Like Vuvuzelas Always Ready to Blow": Exploring How to Engage Young Children in Violence Research.“儿童就像嗡嗡祖拉，随时准备吹响”：探索如何让幼儿参与暴力研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug;39(15-16):3325-3351. doi: 10.1177/08862605241230088. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Intimate partner violence during COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis according to methodological choices.COVID-19 期间的亲密伴侣暴力：根据方法选择进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17802-9.
4
Understanding sexual violence in sex working populations-Law, legal consciousness and legal practice in four countries (2021-2023): Study Protocol v2.5.理解性工作者中的性暴力问题——四个国家（2021-2023 年）的法律、法律意识和法律实践：研究方案 v2.5。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0283067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283067. eCollection 2023.
5
'Through the drawings…they are able to tell you straight': Using arts-based methods in violence research in South Africa.“通过这些画作……他们能够直接告诉你”：在南非暴力研究中运用基于艺术的方法
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 9;3(10):e0002209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002209. eCollection 2023.
6
Understanding the Prevalence Rates of Interpersonal Violence Experienced by Young French-Speaking Swiss Athletes.了解瑞士法语区年轻运动员遭受人际暴力的流行率。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 20;12:726635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726635. eCollection 2021.
7
A comparison of two population-based household surveys in Uganda for assessment of violence against youth.乌干达两项基于人群的家庭调查评估青年暴力情况的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0260986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260986. eCollection 2021.
8
The Challenges of Conducting Qualitative Research on "couples" in Abusive Intimate Partner Relationships Involving Substance Use.对涉及物质使用的虐待性亲密伴侣关系中的“伴侣”进行定性研究的挑战。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Mar;31(4):767-777. doi: 10.1177/1049732320975722. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Intimate partner violence, associations with perceived need for help and health care utilization: a population-based sample of women in Sweden.亲密伴侣暴力、与感知到的求助需求及医疗保健利用的关联：瑞典女性的一项基于人群的样本研究
Scand J Public Health. 2021 May;49(3):268-276. doi: 10.1177/1403494820930952. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
Quality of life, psychological distress and violence among women in close relationships: a population-based study in Finland.亲密关系中女性的生活质量、心理困扰和暴力：芬兰的一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00950-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Instruments to Assess Intimate Partner Violence: A Scoping Review of the Literature.评估亲密伴侣暴力的工具：文献综述
Violence Vict. 2016;31(4):591-621. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00122. Epub 2016 May 27.
2
A comparison of methods to assess intimate partner abuse 1 year postpartum.产后1年亲密伴侣虐待评估方法的比较
Ann Epidemiol. 2014 May;24(5):404-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
3
Interviewer effects when investigating abuse were not compatible with effect modification but instead with confounding.当调查虐待行为时，采访者的影响与效应修饰不兼容，而是与混杂因素有关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):911-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.020. Epub 2013 May 4.
4
Individual differences in sensitivity to violence.对暴力的敏感性存在个体差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Dec;113(3):703-14. doi: 10.2466/07.17.21.PMS.113.6.703-714.
5
Does interview setting influence disclosure of violence? A study in elderly.访谈环境是否会影响暴力行为的披露？一项针对老年人的研究。
Age Ageing. 2012 Jan;41(1):70-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr090. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
6
Determining the interviewer effect on CQ Index outcomes: a multilevel approach.确定面试官效应对 CQ 指数结果的影响：一种多层次的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Aug 19;10:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-75.
7
Sensitivity to violence measured by ratings of severity increases after nonviolence training.非暴力培训后，对暴力的敏感度（通过严重程度的评分来衡量）会增加。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Feb;110(1):48-60. doi: 10.2466/PMS.110.1.48-60.
8
Interviewer effects in public health surveys.公众健康调查中的访谈者效应。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Feb;25(1):14-26. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp046. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
9
Ethical conduct in intimate partner violence research: challenges and strategies.亲密伴侣暴力研究中的伦理行为：挑战与策略。
Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.005.
10
Shifts in guidelines for ethical scientific conduct: how public and private organizations create and change norms of research integrity.伦理科学行为准则的转变：公共和私人组织如何创建和改变研究诚信规范。
Soc Stud Sci. 2009 Feb;39(1):137-55. doi: 10.1177/0306312708097659.
Zotero 插件