Chandra Singh Mamatha, Kelso Celine, Price William E, Probst Yasmine
School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Food Res Int. 2020 Dec;138(Pt A):109754. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109754. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
Food composition data are challenged by data availability and quality. Anthocyanins are the bright colored pigments found in fruits and vegetables with growing evidence for health benefits. For the estimation of anthocyanin content in the foods, it is imperative to find an ideal analytical method. To quantify anthocyanin components, liquid chromatography-based methods are commonly used. This review addresses the variability of liquid chromatography (LC) mass spectrometry (MS) methods for the identification and quantification of anthocyanins. Published studies for all years until February 2020 reporting LC methods for anthocyanins in fruits and vegetables were screened from 7660 studies. Only 29 studies met the eligibility criteria of method type and of these, only 13 studies reported a validated LC method. A wide range of validation parameters were identified including specificity, calibration, stability, and limits of detection. Differences in the sampling amounts for extraction were observed in all of the included studies. The quantification of multiple anthocyanin types without their corresponding analytical standards was observed in eight studies. The included 13 studies used reverse phase liquid chromatography separation with C type or similar stationary phases and acidified aqueous or acidified aqueous: organic (usually methanol or acetonitrile) binary gradient mobile phases. Although all of the studies used mass spectrometry for identification, ultraviolet absorbance quantification was often used in conjunction with a photo-diode array (DAD/PDA) detector using reference standards where available. Extraction and preparation of samples remains the key concern for analysis as the oxidative stability of anthocyanins are a major impediment for accurate quantification of the components in foods. This review provides a summary of validated LC methods to assist analysts and nutritionists in the quantification of anthocyanin food components as the nutrient profiles of foods are challenged by the variability of the analytical methods.
食物成分数据受到数据可用性和质量的挑战。花青素是在水果和蔬菜中发现的颜色鲜艳的色素,越来越多的证据表明其对健康有益。为了估算食物中的花青素含量,必须找到一种理想的分析方法。为了量化花青素成分,通常使用基于液相色谱的方法。本综述探讨了液相色谱(LC)-质谱(MS)方法在花青素鉴定和定量方面的变异性。从7660项研究中筛选了截至2020年2月所有年份发表的关于水果和蔬菜中花青素LC方法的研究。只有29项研究符合方法类型的纳入标准,其中只有13项研究报告了经过验证的LC方法。确定了广泛的验证参数,包括特异性、校准、稳定性和检测限。在所有纳入的研究中都观察到了提取样品量的差异。八项研究中观察到在没有相应分析标准品的情况下对多种花青素类型进行定量。纳入的13项研究使用反相液相色谱分离,采用C型或类似固定相以及酸化水相或酸化水相:有机相(通常是甲醇或乙腈)二元梯度流动相。尽管所有研究都使用质谱进行鉴定,但在有参考标准品的情况下,紫外吸收定量通常与光电二极管阵列(DAD/PDA)检测器结合使用。样品的提取和制备仍然是分析的关键问题,因为花青素的氧化稳定性是准确量化食物中成分的主要障碍。本综述总结了经过验证的LC方法,以帮助分析人员和营养学家量化花青素食物成分,因为食物的营养成分受到分析方法变异性的挑战。