Suppr超能文献

理解重复自伤行为的功能:一种 Q 方法学研究。

Understanding the functions of repeated self-harm: A Q methodology approach.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113527. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113527. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple repetition of self-harm is common and is associated with poor quality of life and with an increased risk of suicide. Treatment outside specialist clinics rarely takes account of what is known about the varied and conflicting reasons for multiple repetition. We aimed to identify ways in which individuals who self-harm make sense of their motivations for repetition.

METHODS

In 2018/2019 we recruited 59 participants from NHS services, support organizations in England and via social media into a Q-methodology study. Participants sorted, ranked and commented on 46 separate functions of self-harm according to whether they agreed or disagreed with them as reasons for their own self-harm. The functions were identified from a range of academic sources and first-person accounts.

RESULTS

Principal Component Analysis was used to identify four distinct accounts for repeated self-harm: 1) Managing my mental state, 2) Communicating Distress, 3) Distract from suicidal thoughts or feelings and 4) Producing positive feelings. There were no clear links between account and gender or other respondent characteristic, although those who self-harmed most regularly and frequently ('so many times I've lost count') were mostly in Accounts 1 and 4.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to use Q methodology to explore reasons for repeated self-harm. The accounts identified can help in personalizing therapy by going beyond models that focus on a single function such as affect regulation or experiential avoidance, while reducing the field to a manageable number of points of view that can be explored in therapy.

摘要

背景

多次重复自伤行为较为常见,与生活质量较差以及自杀风险增加有关。在专科诊所之外进行的治疗很少考虑到人们对多次重复自伤行为的各种不同且相互矛盾的原因的了解。我们旨在确定那些自伤者如何理解他们重复自伤行为的动机。

方法

在 2018/2019 年,我们从英国国民保健署服务机构、支持组织以及通过社交媒体招募了 59 名参与者,他们参与了一项 Q 方法学研究。参与者根据自己的自伤行为是否同意或不同意 46 个不同的自伤功能,对其进行分类、排序和评论。这些功能是从一系列学术来源和第一人称叙述中确定的。

结果

主成分分析用于确定重复自伤的四个不同解释:1)管理我的心理状态;2)表达痛苦;3)分散对自杀想法或感觉的注意力;4)产生积极的感觉。解释与性别或其他受访者特征之间没有明确的联系,尽管那些最经常和频繁地自伤的人(“次数多到我都数不清了”)主要属于解释 1 和 4。

结论

这是第一项使用 Q 方法学来探索重复自伤原因的研究。所确定的解释可以通过超越关注单一功能(如情绪调节或体验回避)的模型来帮助个性化治疗,同时将该领域简化为可以在治疗中探讨的可管理的观点数量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验