Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nursing, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e039109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039109.
Safewards is an organisational approach to delivering inpatient mental health services. The aim of Safewards is to minimise the number of situations in which conflict arises between healthcare workers and patients that lead to the use of coercive interventions (restriction and/or containment).The Safewards Model has been developed, implemented and evaluated for its impact on all forms of containment. Safewards has been adopted as the recommended approach to preventing patient agitation and clinical aggression in some jurisdictions. Notwithstanding these recommendations, the outcomes of Safewards for staff and patients have not been comprehensively described.The aim of the scoping review is to describe (1) Safewards interventions; (2) how Safewards interventions have been implemented in healthcare settings; (3) outcome measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of Safewards; (4) barriers and enablers to the uptake and sustainability of Safewards. This review will provide a foundation for further research and/or systematic review of the effectiveness of Safewards.
Peer-reviewed manuscripts of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method research in English with be included for the period 01 January 2013- December 31st 2020. Electronic databases including Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Embase, Emcare, Joanna Briggs Institute, Medline, Global Health, PsycINFO and Scopus will be searched. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and explanation and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol will be followed. Publications will be excluded if they do not include the required participants, concept or context. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles and abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion.
Ethical approval for this review is not required as the information to be collected is publicly available. There are no participants or safety considerations in this review of published literature. Key findings for future research and clinical practice will be disseminated though peer-reviewed publication, stakeholder reporting and conference presentations.
Safewards 是一种提供住院精神卫生服务的组织方法。Safewards 的目的是尽量减少医护人员和患者之间发生冲突的情况,这些冲突会导致使用强制性干预措施(限制和/或约束)。Safewards 模式已经开发、实施和评估了其对所有形式的约束的影响。Safewards 已被一些司法管辖区采用为预防患者激动和临床攻击的推荐方法。尽管有这些建议,但 Safewards 对员工和患者的结果尚未得到全面描述。本次范围综述的目的是描述:(1) Safewards 干预措施;(2) Safewards 干预措施在医疗保健环境中的实施方式;(3) 用于评估 Safewards 有效性的结果测量;(4) Safewards 的采用和可持续性的障碍和促进因素。本综述将为 Safewards 有效性的进一步研究和/或系统综述提供基础。
将纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的英语同行评审的定量、定性和混合方法研究的同行评审手稿。将检索电子数据库,包括 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Cochrane、Embase、Emcare、 Joanna Briggs Institute、Medline、Global Health、PsycINFO 和 Scopus。将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目的范围综述清单和解释以及系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目。如果出版物不包括所需的参与者、概念或背景,则将其排除在外。两名审查员将独立筛选所有标题和摘要以及全文研究以确定是否纳入。
本综述不需要伦理批准,因为要收集的信息是公开的。在对已发表文献的审查中,没有参与者或安全问题。未来研究和临床实践的主要发现将通过同行评审出版物、利益相关者报告和会议演讲来传播。