Department of Respiratory Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
School of Public Health, Health Policy and Leadership, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
Respir Care. 2021 Apr;66(4):541-550. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07200. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Clinical alarms play an important role in monitoring physiological parameters, vital signs and medical device function in the hospital intensive care environment. Delays in staff response to alarms are well documented as health care providers become desensitized to increased rates of nuisance alarms. Patients can be at increased risk of harm due to alarm fatigue. Current literature suggests alarms from ventilators contribute significantly to nonactionable alarms. A greater understanding of which specific ventilator alarms are most common and the rates at which they occur is fundamental to improving alarm management.
A retrospective review was performed on alarms that occurred on the Avea and Servo-i ventilators used in the pediatric ICU and pediatric cardiothoracic ICU at a major metropolitan children's hospital. High- and medium-priority alarms, as classified by the manufacturer, were studied between June 1, 2017, and November 31, 2017. Descriptive data analysis and a 2-proportion z-test were performed to identify proportionality, cause, and prevalence rates in the pediatric ICU and the cardiothoracic ICU.
Eleven distinct ventilator alarms were identified during 2,091 d of mechanical ventilation. The Inspiratory Flow Overrange alarm (42.4%) on the Servo-i, Low V (20.4%; expiratory tidal volume) and Circuit Integrity alarm (20.0%) on the Avea were the most prevalent causes according to ventilator type. Medium-priority alarms comprised 68.7% of all Servo-i alarms, and high-priority alarms comprised 84% of all Avea alarms. The 2-sample test of proportions was significant for differences between both areas ( < .001). The overall alarm prevalence rate was 22.5 ventilator alarms per ventilator-day per patient.
The cause and proportion of alarms varied by ventilator and care unit. High-priority alarms were most common with the Avea and medium-priority alarms for the Servo-i. The overall combined ventilator alarm prevalence rate was 22.5 alarms per ventilator-day per patient.
临床警报在医院重症监护环境中对监测生理参数、生命体征和医疗设备功能起着重要作用。有文献记录显示,医护人员对不断增加的无效警报变得麻木不仁,从而导致他们对警报的反应延迟。由于警报疲劳,患者可能面临更高的伤害风险。目前的文献表明,来自呼吸机的警报对无效警报的贡献很大。更深入地了解哪些特定的呼吸机警报最常见,以及它们发生的频率,对于改善警报管理至关重要。
对一家主要大都市儿童医院的儿科重症监护病房(PICU)和儿科心胸重症监护病房(PCICU)使用的 Avea 和 Servo-i 呼吸机上发生的警报进行了回顾性审查。研究对象为制造商分类的高优先级和中优先级警报,研究时间为 2017 年 6 月 1 日至 2017 年 11 月 31 日。采用描述性数据分析和两比例 z 检验来确定 PICU 和 PCICU 中的比例、原因和发生率。
在 2091 天的机械通气期间,共发现 11 种不同的呼吸机警报。Servo-i 上的吸气流量超限警报(42.4%)、Avea 上的低 V(20.4%;呼气潮气量)和回路完整性警报(20.0%)是按呼吸机类型划分的最常见原因。中优先级警报占 Servo-i 警报的 68.7%,高优先级警报占 Avea 警报的 84.0%。两个样本比例检验在两个区域之间存在显著差异(<0.001)。总的警报发生率为每台呼吸机每天每例患者 22.5 个呼吸机警报。
警报的原因和比例因呼吸机和护理单元而异。Avea 上的高优先级警报最常见,Servo-i 上的中优先级警报最常见。总的联合呼吸机警报发生率为每台呼吸机每天每例患者 22.5 个警报。