Suppr超能文献

同期放化疗治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者的理由。

Rationale for concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2020 Dec;123(Suppl 1):10-17. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01070-6.

Abstract

When treating patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), those with a good performance status and disease measured within a radical treatment volume should be considered for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This guidance is based on key scientific rationale from two large Phase 3 randomised studies and meta-analyses demonstrating the superiority of cCRT over sequential (sCRT). However, the efficacy of cCRT comes at the cost of increased acute toxicity versus sequential treatment. Currently, there are several documented approaches that are addressing this drawback, which this paper outlines. At the point of diagnosis, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach can enable accurate assessment of patients, to determine the optimal treatment strategy to minimise risks. In addition, reviewing the Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice (ACROP) guidelines can provide clinical oncologists with additional recommendations for outlining target volume and organ-at-risk delineation for standard clinical scenarios in definitive cCRT (and adjuvant radiotherapy). Furthermore, modern advances in radiotherapy treatment planning software and treatment delivery mean that radiation oncologists can safely treat substantially larger lung tumours with higher radiotherapy doses, with greater accuracy, whilst minimising the radiotherapy dose to the surrounding healthy tissues. The combination of these advances in cCRT may assist in creating comprehensive strategies to allow patients to receive potentially curative benefits from treatments such as immunotherapy, as well as minimising treatment-related risks.

摘要

对于不可切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,那些体能状态良好且疾病处于根治性治疗范围内的患者应考虑进行同步放化疗(cCRT)。这一建议基于两项大型 III 期随机研究和荟萃分析的重要科学依据,这些研究表明 cCRT 优于序贯(sCRT)。然而,cCRT 的疗效是以增加急性毒性为代价的,与序贯治疗相比。目前,有几种已被证实的方法可以解决这一缺点,本文对此进行了概述。在诊断时,多学科团队(MDT)方法可以对患者进行准确评估,确定最佳治疗策略以降低风险。此外,审查放射肿瘤学实践咨询委员会(ACROP)指南可为临床肿瘤学家提供额外的建议,以明确界定标准 cCRT(和辅助放疗)中常见临床情况的靶区和危及器官的描绘。此外,放射治疗计划软件和治疗方案的现代进展意味着放射肿瘤学家可以更安全地用更高的放射剂量治疗更大的肺部肿瘤,具有更高的准确性,同时将周围健康组织的放射剂量降至最低。这些 cCRT 方面的进展相结合,可能有助于制定全面的策略,使患者能够从免疫治疗等治疗中获得潜在的治愈益处,同时将治疗相关风险降至最低。

相似文献

4
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌的同步放化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002140. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002140.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Cardiotoxicity following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer.肺癌胸部放疗后的心脏毒性
Br J Cancer. 2025 Mar;132(4):311-325. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02888-0. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验