Claussen Carlota, Rody Achim, Hanker Lars
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Lübeck, Germany.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020 Dec;80(12):1195-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-1128-0280. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death from gynecological tumors. Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer develop recurrence after concluding first-line therapy, making further lines of therapy necessary. The choice of therapy depends on various criteria such as tumor biology, the patient's general condition (ECOG), toxicity, previous chemotherapy, and response to chemotherapy. The platinum-free or treatment-free interval determines the potential response to repeat platinum-based therapy. If patients have late recurrence, i.e. > 6 months after the end of the last platinum-based therapy (i.e., they were previously platinum-sensitive), then they are usually considered suitable for another round of a platinum-based combination therapy. Patients who are not considered suitable for platinum-based chemotherapy are treated with a platinum-free regimen such as weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), gemcitabine, or topotecan. Treatment for the patient subgroup which is considered suitable for platinum-based therapy but cannot receive carboplatin due to uncontrollable hypersensitivity reactions may consist of trabectedin and PLD. While the use of surgery to treat recurrence has long been a controversial issue, new findings from the DESKTOP III study of the AGO working group have drawn attention to this issue again, particularly for patients with a platinum-free interval of > 6 months and a positive AGO score. Clinical studies have also shown the efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab and the PARP inhibitors olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib. These drugs have substantially changed current treatment practice and expanded the range of available therapies. It is important to differentiate between purely maintenance therapy after completing CTX, continuous maintenance therapy during CTX, and the therapeutic use of these substances. The PARP inhibitors niraparib, olaparib and rucaparib have already been approved for use by the FDA and the EMA. The presence of a BRCA mutation is a predictive factor for a better response to PARP inhibitors.
上皮性卵巢癌是妇科肿瘤致死的最常见原因。大多数晚期卵巢癌患者在一线治疗结束后会复发,因此需要进一步治疗。治疗方案的选择取决于多种标准,如肿瘤生物学特性、患者的一般状况(东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分)、毒性、既往化疗情况以及对化疗的反应。无铂间期或无治疗间期决定了对重复铂类治疗的潜在反应。如果患者复发较晚,即在上次铂类治疗结束后>6个月(即他们之前对铂类敏感),那么通常认为他们适合再次进行铂类联合治疗。不适合铂类化疗的患者采用无铂方案治疗,如每周使用紫杉醇、聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素(PLD)、吉西他滨或拓扑替康。对于被认为适合铂类治疗但因无法控制的超敏反应而不能接受卡铂治疗的患者亚组,治疗方案可能包括曲贝替定和PLD。虽然手术治疗复发长期以来一直是一个有争议的问题,但AGO工作组DESKTOP III研究的新发现再次引起了人们对这个问题的关注,特别是对于无铂间期>6个月且AGO评分阳性的患者。临床研究也显示了血管生成抑制剂如贝伐单抗以及PARP抑制剂奥拉帕利、尼拉帕利和鲁卡帕利的疗效。这些药物极大地改变了当前的治疗实践,并扩大了可用治疗方法的范围。区分完成化疗后的单纯维持治疗、化疗期间的持续维持治疗以及这些药物的治疗性使用很重要。PARP抑制剂尼拉帕利、奥拉帕利和鲁卡帕利已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准使用。BRCA突变的存在是对PARP抑制剂反应更好的预测因素。