• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健人员在引入伤口管理数字决策支持系统时的参与体验:定性研究

Health Care Staff's Experiences of Engagement When Introducing a Digital Decision Support System for Wound Management: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Wickström Hanna, Tuvesson Hanna, Öien Rut, Midlöv Patrik, Fagerström Cecilia

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Blekinge Wound Healing Centre, Karlshamn, Sweden.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Dec 9;7(4):e23188. doi: 10.2196/23188.

DOI:10.2196/23188
PMID:33295295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7758170/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth solutions such as digital decision support systems (DDSSs) have the potential to assist collaboration between health care staff to improve matters for specific patient groups. Patients with hard-to-heal ulcers have long healing times because of a lack of guidelines for structured diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Multidisciplinary collaboration in wound management teams is essential. A DDSS could offer a way of aiding improvement within wound management. The introduction of eHealth solutions into health care is complicated, and the engagement of the staff seems crucial. Factors influencing and affecting engagement need to be understood and considered for the introduction of a DDSS to succeed.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe health care staff's experiences of engagement and barriers to and influencers of engagement when introducing a DDSS for wound management.

METHODS

This study uses a qualitative approach. Interviews were conducted with 11 health care staff within primary (n=4), community (n=6), and specialist (n=1) care during the start-up of the introduction of a DDSS for wound management. The interviews focused on the staff's experiences of engagement. Content analysis by Burnard was used in the data analysis process.

RESULTS

A total of 4 categories emerged describing the participants' experiences of engagement: a personal liaison, a professional commitment, an extended togetherness, and an awareness and understanding of the circumstances.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies barriers to and influencers of engagement, reinforcing that staff experience engagement through feeling a personal liaison and a professional commitment to make things better for their patients. In addition, engagement is nourished by sharing with coworkers and by active support and understanding from leadership.

摘要

背景

数字决策支持系统(DDSSs)等电子健康解决方案有潜力协助医护人员之间的协作,以改善特定患者群体的状况。由于缺乏结构化诊断、治疗和随访指南,难愈合溃疡患者的愈合时间较长。伤口管理团队中的多学科协作至关重要。DDSS可以提供一种促进伤口管理改善的方法。将电子健康解决方案引入医疗保健领域很复杂,员工的参与似乎至关重要。为使DDSS的引入取得成功,需要了解和考虑影响参与的因素。

目的

本研究旨在描述医护人员在引入伤口管理DDSS时的参与体验、参与的障碍和影响因素。

方法

本研究采用定性方法。在引入伤口管理DDSS的启动阶段,对11名初级(n = 4)、社区(n = 6)和专科(n = 1)护理领域的医护人员进行了访谈。访谈聚焦于员工的参与体验。数据分析过程中采用了伯纳尔德的内容分析法。

结果

共出现了4个类别,描述了参与者的参与体验:个人联系、专业承诺、更广泛的团结以及对情况的认识和理解。

结论

本研究确定了参与的障碍和影响因素,强化了员工通过感受到个人联系和为患者改善状况的专业承诺来体验参与。此外,与同事分享以及领导的积极支持和理解会促进参与。

相似文献

1
Health Care Staff's Experiences of Engagement When Introducing a Digital Decision Support System for Wound Management: Qualitative Study.医疗保健人员在引入伤口管理数字决策支持系统时的参与体验:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Dec 9;7(4):e23188. doi: 10.2196/23188.
2
Still engaged - healthcare staff's engagement when introducing a new eHealth solution for wound management: a qualitative study.仍在参与 - 医疗保健人员在引入新的电子健康解决方案进行伤口管理时的参与情况:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07515-3.
3
Health Professionals' eHealth Literacy and System Experience Before and 3 Months After the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System: Longitudinal Study.电子健康记录系统实施前及实施后3个月医疗专业人员的电子健康素养和系统体验:纵向研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 29;9(2):e29780. doi: 10.2196/29780.
4
Antibiotic prescription using a digital decision support system: a register-based study of patients with hard-to-heal ulcers in Sweden.使用数字化决策支持系统开具抗生素处方:瑞典难愈性溃疡患者的基于登记的研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e060683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060683.
5
General practitioners' user experience of the nationwide digital decision support system in primary care.全科医生对全国基层医疗数字决策支持系统的用户体验
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241271816. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271816. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Staff and patient perspectives on therapeutic engagement during one-to-one observation.员工和患者对一对一观察期间治疗参与的看法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):546-557. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12497. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Health Care Professionals' Experience of a Digital Tool for Patient Exchange, Anamnesis, and Triage in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员对基层医疗中患者信息交换、病历及分诊数字工具的体验:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Dec 14;7(4):e21698. doi: 10.2196/21698.
9
Introducing a model incorporating early integration of specialist palliative care: A qualitative research study of staff's perspectives.引入一个纳入专科姑息治疗早期整合的模型:一项关于工作人员观点的定性研究
Palliat Med. 2016 Mar;30(3):303-12. doi: 10.1177/0269216315598069. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Applications of human factors approaches and methods to the development of teleconsultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review.人为因素方法在基层医疗远程会诊发展中的应用:一项系统的范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 5;14(3):e003023. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003023.
2
Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial With a Mobile Health Intervention for Children With Obesity.一项针对肥胖儿童的移动健康干预随机对照试验的过程评估
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Jun 25;12:30502225251348292. doi: 10.1177/30502225251348292. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Development and validation of the DHIS2 platform for integrating sociomedical data to study wound care outcomes.用于整合社会医学数据以研究伤口护理结果的DHIS2平台的开发与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 4;19(12):e0308553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308553. eCollection 2024.
4
The influencing factors of nurses' job engagement in tertiary, A grade hospitals in East China: A cross-sectional study.华东地区三甲医院护士工作投入的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70037. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70037.
5
Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.探讨专业身份在临床决策支持系统实施中的作用——叙事性综述。
Implement Sci. 2024 Feb 12;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x.
6
Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.利益相关者对临床人工智能实施的观点:定性证据的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 10;25:e39742. doi: 10.2196/39742.
7
Antibiotic prescription using a digital decision support system: a register-based study of patients with hard-to-heal ulcers in Sweden.使用数字化决策支持系统开具抗生素处方:瑞典难愈性溃疡患者的基于登记的研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e060683. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060683.
8
Still engaged - healthcare staff's engagement when introducing a new eHealth solution for wound management: a qualitative study.仍在参与 - 医疗保健人员在引入新的电子健康解决方案进行伤口管理时的参与情况:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07515-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician engagement: a concept analysis.医生参与度:一项概念分析
J Healthc Leadersh. 2019 Jul 26;11:101-113. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S214765. eCollection 2019.
2
Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Decision Support System to Prevent and Treat Disease-Related Malnutrition in a Hospital Setting: Qualitative Study.医院环境中实施决策支持系统以预防和治疗疾病相关营养不良的障碍与促进因素:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 May 9;3(2):e11890. doi: 10.2196/11890.
3
Measuring Engagement in eHealth and mHealth Behavior Change Interventions: Viewpoint of Methodologies.衡量电子健康和移动健康行为改变干预中的参与度:方法论视角
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 16;20(11):e292. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9397.
4
If we build it, will they come? Issues of engagement with digital health interventions for trauma recovery.如果我们构建了它,他们会来吗?关于参与创伤恢复数字健康干预措施的问题。
Mhealth. 2018 Sep 11;4:37. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.08.04. eCollection 2018.
5
Models Used in Clinical Decision Support Systems Supporting Healthcare Professionals Treating Chronic Wounds: Systematic Literature Review.支持医护人员治疗慢性伤口的临床决策支持系统中使用的模型:系统文献综述
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Jun 21;3(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8316.
6
Decision-makers and mediators in a home healthcare digitisation process: nurses' experiences of implementation and use of a decision support system.家庭医疗数字化过程中的决策者与调解人:护士对决策支持系统的实施与使用体验
Contemp Nurse. 2018 Aug-Oct;54(4-5):511-521. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2018.1507676. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
7
Comparing video consultation with inperson assessment for Swedish patients with hard-to-heal ulcers: registry-based studies of healing time and of waiting time.瑞典难愈合溃疡患者视频会诊与面对面评估的比较:基于登记的愈合时间和等待时间研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 15;8(2):e017623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017623.
8
Health care clinicians' engagement in organizational redesign of care processes: The importance of work and organizational conditions.卫生保健临床医生参与医疗流程的组织再设计:工作和组织条件的重要性。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: A systematic review of measure quality.评估复杂面对面健康行为改变干预措施的传递和参与的忠实度的测量方法:测量质量的系统评价。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):872-903. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12260. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
10
Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.对数字行为改变干预措施参与度的概念化:一项运用批判性解释性综合原则的系统评价
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1.