• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生对全国基层医疗数字决策支持系统的用户体验

General practitioners' user experience of the nationwide digital decision support system in primary care.

作者信息

Šteinmiller Jekaterina, Ross Peeter

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Technologies, School of IT, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241271816. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271816. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241271816
PMID:39247092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378188/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to describe the user experiences of a nationwide digital decision support system (DDSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DDSSs have the potential to improve the quality and safety of healthcare services by supporting clinical decision-making with evidence-based recommendations. Due to a lack of knowledge, it is difficult to assess whether DDSSs are fulfilling their purpose. In Estonia, a nationwide DDSS for general practitioners (GPs) was implemented in 2020. To understand the impact of DDSS on the quality of care in the Estonian context and meet the demands of healthcare, it is necessary to gather information about the experiences of the users. This is the first study that examines the experiences of GPs on the use of DDSS nationwide.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted based on snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were performed in February-March 2022 with nine GPs. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis. A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data.

RESULTS

A total of six themes and 16 subthemes emerged from the data. The following themes were identified: user-friendliness, DDSS use in clinical practice, benefits of the DDSS, and the impact of the DDSS on GPs' work, barriers to using the DDSS, and suggestions for improving the user experience. The results of the study are important, as they address and contribute to the relevant aspects of digital health in primary care.

CONCLUSION

GPs shared their individual user experiences, including user-perceived barriers and enabling factors that influence the implementation and use of a decision support system in primary care settings. It is revealed that GPs have different benefits and barriers depending on the topic discussed. Future research should evaluate the functioning of the DDSS and the quality of the decisions it provides by observing and evaluating patient records. Systematic user experiences need to be collected and examined to ensure the usability and sustainability of the DDSS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一个全国性数字决策支持系统(DDSS)的用户体验。

背景数据总结

DDSS有潜力通过基于证据的建议支持临床决策,从而提高医疗服务的质量和安全性。由于缺乏相关知识,很难评估DDSS是否实现了其目标。2020年,爱沙尼亚实施了一个面向全科医生(GP)的全国性DDSS。为了解DDSS在爱沙尼亚背景下对医疗质量的影响并满足医疗保健需求,有必要收集用户体验信息。这是第一项在全国范围内研究全科医生使用DDSS体验的研究。

方法

基于滚雪球抽样进行了一项定性描述性研究。2022年2月至3月,对9名全科医生进行了半结构化访谈。通过主题分析对数据进行了分析。数据共产生了6个主题和16个子主题。

结果

数据共产生了6个主题和16个子主题。确定了以下主题:用户友好性、DDSS在临床实践中的使用、DDSS的益处、DDSS对全科医生工作的影响、使用DDSS的障碍以及改善用户体验的建议。该研究结果很重要,因为它们涉及并有助于初级保健中数字健康的相关方面。

结论

全科医生分享了他们的个人用户体验,包括用户感知到的影响初级保健环境中决策支持系统实施和使用的障碍及促成因素。结果表明,根据所讨论的主题,全科医生有不同的益处和障碍。未来的研究应通过观察和评估患者记录来评估DDSS的功能及其提供的决策质量。需要收集和检查系统的用户体验,以确保DDSS的可用性和可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc08/11378188/96d525141289/10.1177_20552076241271816-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc08/11378188/96d525141289/10.1177_20552076241271816-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc08/11378188/96d525141289/10.1177_20552076241271816-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
General practitioners' user experience of the nationwide digital decision support system in primary care.全科医生对全国基层医疗数字决策支持系统的用户体验
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241271816. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271816. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Digital encounter decision aids linked to clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing SHARE-IT decision aids in primary care.数字邂逅决策辅助工具与临床实践指南相关联:在初级保健中测试 SHARE-IT 决策辅助工具的结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 May 22;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02186-4.
3
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
4
Digital Triage Tools for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Compared With General Practitioners' Advice: Vignette-Based Qualitative Study With Interviews Among General Practitioners.基于病例的定性研究:数字分诊工具与全科医生建议用于性传播感染检测的比较——对全科医生进行访谈
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jan 22;11:e49221. doi: 10.2196/49221.
5
GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study.全科医生对共享决策培训中教学方法的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e310-e317. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0194. Print 2023 Apr.
6
Beyond Known Barriers-Assessing Physician Perspectives and Attitudes Toward Introducing Open Health Records in Germany: Qualitative Study.突破已知障碍——评估德国医生对引入开放健康记录的观点和态度:定性研究
J Particip Med. 2020 Nov 6;12(4):e19093. doi: 10.2196/19093.
7
Lessons from the failure of implementing the 'Better Care Better Value' prescribing indicator for renin-angiotensin system drugs in England: a qualitative study of general practitioners' perceptions using behavioural change framework.从英国实施“更好的护理更好的价值”血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂处方指标失败中吸取的教训:使用行为改变框架对全科医生认知的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 23;10(6):e035910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035910.
8
Early-career general practitioners' career intentions in Estonia: A qualitative study.爱沙尼亚初入职全科医生的职业意向:一项定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2368557. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2368557. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
9
General practitioners' knowledge of leg ulcer treatment in primary healthcare: an interview study.全科医生在初级医疗保健中对下肢溃疡治疗的知识:一项访谈研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Sep 24;21:e34. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000274.
10
Protocol of digital decision support system (DDSS) embedded within a tele-primary healthcare platform in Pakistan: an assessment of usability, acceptability, effectiveness and perceived quality of care in a resource-constrained setting.嵌入在巴基斯坦远程初级保健平台内的数字决策支持系统(DDSS)方案:在资源有限的环境中评估其可用性、可接受性、有效性和感知护理质量。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e082167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082167.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians' Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED.医生对 ED 心力衰竭患者治疗的临床决策支持的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344393. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393.
2
The voice of healthcare: introducing digital decision support systems into clinical practice - a qualitative study.医疗保健的声音:将数字决策支持系统引入临床实践 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 13;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02024-6.
3
Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.
临床决策支持系统在初级保健中的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):57-69. doi: 10.1370/afm.2908.
4
Challenges of using e-health technologies to support clinical care in rural Africa: a longitudinal mixed methods study exploring primary health care nurses' experiences of using an electronic clinical decision support system (CDSS) in South Africa.利用电子健康技术支持非洲农村临床护理面临的挑战:一项纵向混合方法研究,探索南非初级保健护士使用电子临床决策支持系统 (CDSS) 的体验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09001-2.
5
Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review of experimental and observational studies.计算机临床决策支持系统(CDSS)对护理和相关卫生专业人员绩效及患者结局的影响:实验性和观察性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):e053886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053886.
6
Automation in nursing decision support systems: A systematic review of effects on decision making, care delivery, and patient outcomes.护理决策支持系统中的自动化:对决策制定、护理提供和患者结局影响的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Oct 12;28(11):2502-2513. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab123.
7
Clinical Utility and Functionality of an Artificial Intelligence-Based App to Predict Mortality in COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis.基于人工智能的应用程序预测COVID-19死亡率的临床效用和功能:混合方法分析
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 28;5(7):e27992. doi: 10.2196/27992.
8
Development and Implementation of a Decision Support System to Improve Control of Hypertension and Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Area in Brazil: Mixed Methods Study.开发和实施决策支持系统以改善巴西资源有限地区的高血压和糖尿病控制:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e18872. doi: 10.2196/18872.
9
Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study.研究人员对涉及人类受试者的研究中获取知情同意要求的看法及经历:一项定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 2;21(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00538-7.
10
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.临床决策支持系统概述:益处、风险及成功策略。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y. eCollection 2020.