Research Unit for Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2021 Mar;26(1):55-65. doi: 10.1111/jns.12424. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) can be classified based on fiber diameter into three subtypes: small fiber neuropathy (SFN), large fiber neuropathy (LFN), and mixed fiber neuropathy (MFN). We examined the effect of different diagnostic models on the frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes in type 2 diabetes patients with DPN. This study was based on patients from the Danish Center for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes cohort. We defined DPN as probable or definite DPN according to the Toronto Consensus Criteria. DPN was then subtyped according to four distinct diagnostic models. A total of 277 diabetes patients (214 with DPN and 63 with no DPN) were included in the study. We found a considerable variation in polyneuropathy subtypes by applying different diagnostic models independent of the degree of certainty of DPN diagnosis. For probable and definite DPN, the frequency of subtypes across diagnostic models varied from: 1.4% to 13.1% for SFN, 9.3% to 21.5% for LFN, 51.4% to 83.2% for MFN, and 0.5% to 14.5% for non-classifiable neuropathy (NCN). For the definite DPN group, the frequency of subtypes varied from: 1.6% to 13.5% for SFN, 5.6% to 20.6% for LFN, 61.9% to 89.7% for MFN, and 0.0% to 6.3% for NCN. The frequency of polyneuropathy subtypes depends on the type and number of criteria applied in a diagnostic model. Future consensus criteria should clearly define sensory functions to be tested, methods of testing, and how findings should be interpreted for both clinical practice and research purpose.
糖尿病性多发性神经病(DPN)可根据纤维直径分为三种亚型:小纤维神经病(SFN)、大纤维神经病(LFN)和混合纤维神经病(MFN)。我们研究了不同诊断模型对伴有 DPN 的 2 型糖尿病患者多发性神经病亚型频率的影响。该研究基于丹麦 2 型糖尿病战略研究中心的患者。我们根据多伦多共识标准将 DPN 定义为可能或确定的 DPN。然后根据四种不同的诊断模型对 DPN 进行亚型分类。共有 277 名糖尿病患者(214 名患有 DPN,63 名没有 DPN)纳入研究。我们发现,应用不同的诊断模型时,即使 DPN 诊断的确定性程度不同,多发性神经病的亚型也存在很大差异。对于可能和确定的 DPN,不同诊断模型下的亚型频率从:1.4%到 13.1%的 SFN、9.3%到 21.5%的 LFN、51.4%到 83.2%的 MFN 和 0.5%到 14.5%的无法分类神经病(NCN)。对于确定的 DPN 组,亚型频率从:1.6%到 13.5%的 SFN、5.6%到 20.6%的 LFN、61.9%到 89.7%的 MFN 和 0.0%到 6.3%的 NCN。神经病亚型的频率取决于诊断模型中应用的类型和数量的标准。未来的共识标准应明确规定要测试的感觉功能、测试方法以及如何为临床实践和研究目的解释发现。