Reynolds Evan L, Koenig Fallon, Watanabe Maya, Kwiatek Alyssa, Elafros Melissa A, Stino Amro, Henderson Don, Herrmann David N, Feldman Eva L, Callaghan Brian C
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48823, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104, USA.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Dec;11(12):3115-3124. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52218. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
Compare the diagnostic characteristics of intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and confocal corneal microscopy (CCM) for distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) and small fiber neuropathy (SFN).
Participants with obesity were recruited from bariatric surgery clinics and testing was performed prior to surgery. DSP and SFN were determined using the Toronto consensus definitions of probable neuropathy. IENFD was assessed from 3 mm punch biopsies of the distal leg and proximal thigh. CCM was performed on both eyes with manual and automated counting. The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire (MNSIq) was also completed. Diagnostic capability was determined using areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) from logistic regression.
We enrolled 140 participants (mean [standard deviation [SD]] age: 50.3 years [7.1], 77.1% female, BMI: 44.4 kg/m [6.7]). In this population, 22.9% had DSP and 14.3% had SFN. Distal leg IENFD had the largest AUC (95% confidence interval) for DSP (0.78, 0.68-0.89) and SFN (0.85, 0.75-0.96). Proximal thigh IENFD (DSP: AUC: 0.59, 0.48-0.69, SFN: AUC: 0.59, 0.46-0.73) and CCM metrics (DSP: AUC range: 0.55-0.60, SFN: AUC range: 0.45-0.62) had poorer diagnostic capability than distal leg IENFD for DSP/SFN (P < 0.05). MNSIq had similar diagnostic capability to distal leg IENFD for both DSP/SFN (DSP: AUC: 0.76, 0.68-0.85, SFN: AUC: 0.81, 0.73-0.88). More participants (52%) preferred skin biopsies to CCM.
Distal leg IENFD was the best quantitative measure of DSP/SFN. CCM had poor diagnostic characteristics and fewer patients preferred this test to IENFD. The MNSIq had similar diagnostic characteristics to distal leg IENFD, indicating its value as a diagnostic tool in the clinical setting.
clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03617185.
比较表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD)和共聚焦角膜显微镜检查(CCM)对远端对称性多发性神经病(DSP)和小纤维神经病(SFN)的诊断特征。
从减肥手术诊所招募肥胖参与者,并在手术前进行检测。使用多伦多关于可能神经病的共识定义来确定DSP和SFN。通过对小腿远端和大腿近端进行3毫米的打孔活检来评估IENFD。使用手动和自动计数对双眼进行CCM检查。还完成了密歇根神经病筛查仪器问卷(MNSIq)。使用逻辑回归分析的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积来确定诊断能力。
我们招募了140名参与者(平均[标准差[SD]]年龄:50.3岁[7.1],77.1%为女性,BMI:44.4kg/m²[6.7])。在这个群体中,22.9%患有DSP,14.3%患有SFN。小腿远端IENFD对DSP(0.78,0.68 - 0.89)和SFN(0.85,0.75 - 0.96)的AUC最大。大腿近端IENFD(DSP:AUC:0.59,0.48 - 0.69,SFN:AUC:0.59,0.46 - 0.73)和CCM指标(DSP:AUC范围:0.55 - 0.60,SFN:AUC范围:0.45 - 0.62)对DSP/SFN的诊断能力不如小腿远端IENFD(P < 0.05)。MNSIq对DSP/SFN的诊断能力与小腿远端IENFD相似(DSP:AUC:0.76,0.68 - 0.85,SFN:AUC:0.81,0.73 - 0.88)。更多参与者(52%)更喜欢皮肤活检而非CCM检查。
小腿远端IENFD是DSP/SFN的最佳定量测量方法。CCM的诊断特征较差,比起IENFD检查,更少患者选择此项检查。MNSIq与小腿远端IENFD具有相似的诊断特征,表明其在临床环境中作为诊断工具的价值。
clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03617185。