Ghadban Farah A, Bay-Smidt Charlotte N, Bjørnkær Asger, Gaist Laura M, Holbech Jakob V, Gaist David, Wirenfeldt Martin, Sindrup Søren H, Krøigård Thomas
Neurology Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research and BRIDGE (Brain Research Interdisciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2025 Sep;30(3):e70051. doi: 10.1111/jns.70051.
Skin biopsies are the primary diagnostic test for small fiber neuropathy, but recently corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) has been developed as an alternative. We compared the correlations of each of these morphometric assessments with peripheral nerve function evaluated through comprehensive quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a mixed etiology polyneuropathy cohort.
CCM and skin biopsies were performed in a prospective cohort of unselected patients undergoing polyneuropathy diagnostic work-up. We used predefined criteria to identify patients with small or mixed fiber neuropathy. The correlations between corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), fiber length (CNFL), branch density (CNBD), and tortuosity (CNFT) and the intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) at the distal leg and the results of QST at the foot were determined.
Two-hundred and forty-four patients were included in the analysis. CNFD was negligibly correlated with warm detection threshold (WDT) (r = -0.15; p = 0.023), while there was no statistically significant correlation with other QST measures. There were no statistically significant correlations between neither CNFL nor CNBD and any of the QST measures. CNFT correlated negligibly with WDT (r = 0.17; p = 0.008) and vibration detection threshold (VDT) (r = -0.13; p = 0.044). IENFD correlated moderately with WDT (r = -0.33; p < 0.0001) and mechanical pain threshold (r = -0.37; p < 0.0001) and weakly with cold detection threshold (r = 0.21; p = 0.0008), mechanical detection threshold (r = -0.21; p = 0.0008) and VDT (r = 0.23; p = 0.0004).
IENFD correlated better with small and large fiber function at the foot than CCM measures in patients with mixed etiology polyneuropathy. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess the clinical utility for neuropathy progression.
皮肤活检是小纤维神经病变的主要诊断检测方法,但最近角膜共焦显微镜检查(CCM)已被开发作为一种替代方法。我们在一个病因混合的多发性神经病变队列中,比较了这些形态学评估与通过综合定量感觉测试(QST)评估的周围神经功能之间的相关性。
对未经选择的正在接受多发性神经病变诊断检查的患者进行前瞻性队列研究,进行CCM和皮肤活检。我们使用预定义标准来识别小纤维或混合纤维神经病变患者。确定角膜神经纤维密度(CNFD)、纤维长度(CNFL)、分支密度(CNBD)和曲折度(CNFT)与小腿远端表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD)以及足部QST结果之间的相关性。
244例患者纳入分析。CNFD与热觉检测阈值(WDT)的相关性可忽略不计(r = -0.15;p = 0.023),而与其他QST指标无统计学显著相关性。CNFL和CNBD与任何QST指标之间均无统计学显著相关性。CNFT与WDT(r = 0.17;p = 0.008)和振动觉检测阈值(VDT)(r = -0.13;p = 0.044)的相关性可忽略不计。IENFD与WDT(r = -0.33;p < 0.0001)和机械性疼痛阈值(r = -0.37;p < 0.0001)中度相关,与冷觉检测阈值(r = 0.21;p = 0.0008)、机械性检测阈值(r = -0.21;p = 0.0008)和VDT(r = 0.23;p = 0.0004)轻度相关。
在病因混合的多发性神经病变患者中,IENFD与足部小纤维和大纤维功能的相关性优于CCM测量值。需要进行纵向研究来评估其对神经病变进展的临床效用。