JW LEE Center for Global Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Korean J Med Educ. 2020 Dec;32(4):307-315. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2020.178. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and satisfaction of an online global health education course for medical students in comparison with an in-person of the course and to assess students' preferences regarding online methods of delivery.
Second-year medical students enrolled in this course in 2019 (in-person) and 2020 (online). The attendance rate, satisfaction in the course evaluation survey, and academic achievement on the written final examination were utilized to compare the two different methods of course delivery. The medical students who took the online course were also asked about their preferences regarding the method of course delivery and the advantages and drawbacks of each method of online lectures.
There was no significant difference in the attendance rate and overall satisfaction between the two groups. The mean score on the written examination of the online course (84.1±19.6) showed comparable effects to the in-person course (78.0±18.3). The percentages of students who achieved high performance (55.5%) and the achieved minimum requirement (95.9%) were also maintained compared to the in-person course (14.6% and 93.6%, respectively). Medical students preferred the online course to the in-person course; in particular, they preferred prerecorded videos over live streaming online lectures.
The participation, satisfaction, and the academic achievement of the online course were comparable to those of the in-person course. However, the greatest drawback of the online course was the lack of interaction between peer learners. Therefore, diverse methods for online education should be considered to increase students' sense of belonging to a learning community.
本研究旨在评估医学专业学生在线全球健康教育课程与面对面课程的可行性和满意度,并评估学生对在线教学方法的偏好。
2019 年(面对面)和 2020 年(在线)入读该课程的二年级医学生。利用出勤率、课程评估调查中的满意度以及书面期末考试的成绩来比较两种不同的课程交付方式。还询问了参加在线课程的医学生对课程交付方式的偏好,以及在线讲座的每种方法的优缺点。
两组的出勤率和总体满意度没有显著差异。在线课程书面考试的平均分数(84.1±19.6)与面对面课程(78.0±18.3)的效果相当。与面对面课程相比,高成绩(55.5%)和达到最低要求(95.9%)的学生比例也保持不变(分别为 14.6%和 93.6%)。医学生更喜欢在线课程而不是面对面课程;特别是,他们更喜欢预先录制的视频而不是在线直播讲座。
在线课程的参与度、满意度和学术成绩与面对面课程相当。然而,在线课程最大的缺点是缺乏学习者之间的互动。因此,应该考虑采用多种在线教育方法,以增强学生对学习社区的归属感。