Division of Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Department of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Jan;169:106522. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106522. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Ictal Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (iSPECT) is one of the established tools utilized in the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Timely isotope injection for an iSPECT is critical for optimal yield but poses logistical challenges when done manually. We aim to evaluate the added value of automatic iSPECT injectors (ASIs) in overcoming such challenges.
We retrospectively reviewed all cases admitted to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Epilepsy Monitoring Unit from Jan 1, 2010, through Dec 31, 2016, who underwent an iSPECT. We compared the manually injected iSPECTs with those performed with ASIs.
A total of 123 iSPECTs were reviewed. The manually injected iSPECT group consisted of 35 patients (median age, 35 years; and 19 males). The automatically injected iSPECT group consisted of 88 patients (median age, 36 years; and 46 males). The two groups were comparable in age, gender, epilepsy treatment, focal features on neuropsychological testing (NPT), EEG, and MRI, and temporal origin of seizures (p > 0.05). Compared to manually injected iSPECTs, automatically injected ISPECTs' median injection latency (IL) was shorter (18.5 vs. 60 s, p < 0.001); the ratio of IL/total duration of seizure was lower (0.395 vs. 0.677, p < 0.001); postictal injections were less frequent (4 (4.5 %) vs. 7 (20 %), p = 0.007); the number of isotope spills was less (zero vs. 3, p = 0.022); and successfully localizing iSPECTs were more prevalent (81.8 % vs. 62.9 %, p = 0.025), even after adjusting for focal features on NPT, EEG, and MRI, the temporal origin of seizures, and seizure duration (OR of 5.539, 95 %CI = 1.653-18.563, p = 0.006).
Utilization of ASIs leads to a significant shortening of iSPECT IL with less postictal injections, provides a safer injection option for the EMU staff, and leads to a significant improvement in the number of successfully localizing iSPECTs.
发作期单光子发射计算机断层扫描(ictal SPECT,iSPECT)是用于评估耐药性癫痫(DRE)患者的术前评估的既定工具之一。对于 iSPECT 来说,及时进行同位素注射对于获得最佳结果至关重要,但手动注射会带来后勤方面的挑战。我们旨在评估自动 iSPECT 注射器(ASIs)在克服此类挑战方面的附加值。
我们回顾性分析了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间在匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)癫痫监测单元就诊并接受 iSPECT 的所有患者的病例。我们比较了手动注射 iSPECT 与自动注射 iSPECT 的结果。
共回顾了 123 例 iSPECT。手动注射 iSPECT 组包括 35 例患者(中位年龄 35 岁,男性 19 例)。自动注射 iSPECT 组包括 88 例患者(中位年龄 36 岁,男性 46 例)。两组在年龄、性别、癫痫治疗、神经心理测试(NPT)、脑电图和 MRI 的局灶特征以及发作的时间起源方面无差异(p>0.05)。与手动注射 iSPECT 相比,自动注射 iSPECT 的中位注射潜伏期(IL)更短(18.5 秒与 60 秒,p<0.001);发作后注射的比例更低(4(4.5%)与 7(20%),p=0.007);同位素溢出的次数更少(0 次与 3 次,p=0.022);成功定位的 iSPECT 更为常见(81.8%与 62.9%,p=0.025),即使在调整 NPT、脑电图和 MRI 的局灶特征、发作的时间起源和发作持续时间后(比值比 5.539,95%置信区间 1.653-18.563,p=0.006)。
使用 ASIs 可显著缩短 iSPECT 的 IL,减少发作后注射,为 EMU 工作人员提供更安全的注射选择,并显著提高成功定位 iSPECT 的数量。