• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状病毒阴谋论信仰、不信任和合规:认真对待测量。

Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance: taking measurement seriously.

机构信息

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(14):3116-3126. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005164. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291720005164
PMID:33298239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7844213/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Freeman . (, , 21, 1-13) argue that there is widespread support for coronavirus conspiracy theories in England. We hypothesise that their estimates of prevalence are inflated due to a flawed research design. When asking respondents to their survey to agree or disagree with pro-conspiracy statements, they used a biased set of response options: four agree options and only one disagree option (and no 'don't know' option). We also hypothesise that due to these flawed measures, the Freeman et al. approach -estimates the strength of the correlation between conspiracy beliefs and compliance. Finally, we hypothesise that, due to reliance on bivariate correlations, Freeman et al. -estimate the causal connection between conspiracy beliefs and compliance.

METHODS

In a pre-registered study, we conduct an experiment embedded in a survey of a representative sample of 2057 adults in England (fieldwork: 16-19 July 2020).

RESULTS

Measured using our advocated 'best practice' approach (balanced response options, with a don't know option), prevalence of support for coronavirus conspiracies is only around five-eighths (62.3%) of that indicated by the Freeman et al. approach. We report mixed results on our correlation and causation hypotheses.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid over-estimating prevalence of support for coronavirus conspiracies, we advocate using a balanced rather than imbalanced set of response options, and including a don't know option.

摘要

背景

弗里曼等人(2021 年)认为,在英格兰,人们普遍支持冠状病毒阴谋论。我们假设他们对流行率的估计因研究设计存在缺陷而被夸大了。当要求受访者对支持阴谋论的陈述表示同意或不同意时,他们使用了一组有偏见的回答选项:四个同意选项和一个不同意选项(没有“不知道”选项)。我们还假设,由于这些有缺陷的措施,弗里曼等人的方法——估计了阴谋信念与合规性之间的相关性强度。最后,我们假设,由于依赖于双变量相关,弗里曼等人——估计了阴谋信念与合规性之间的因果关系。

方法

在一项预先注册的研究中,我们在一项对英格兰 2057 名成年人的代表性样本进行的调查中嵌入了一项实验(实地调查:2020 年 7 月 16 日至 19 日)。

结果

使用我们提倡的“最佳实践”方法(平衡的回答选项,包括“不知道”选项)进行衡量,支持冠状病毒阴谋论的比例仅为弗里曼等人方法所表明的比例的大约八分之五(62.3%)。我们报告了我们的相关性和因果关系假设的混合结果。

结论

为了避免高估对冠状病毒阴谋论的支持率,我们主张使用平衡而不是不平衡的回答选项集,并包括“不知道”选项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/5c4175a3365a/S0033291720005164_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/6e65a7233d1c/S0033291720005164_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/19c3a5346c16/S0033291720005164_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/9a847d5f8afa/S0033291720005164_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/5c4175a3365a/S0033291720005164_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/6e65a7233d1c/S0033291720005164_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/19c3a5346c16/S0033291720005164_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/9a847d5f8afa/S0033291720005164_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f024/7844213/5c4175a3365a/S0033291720005164_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance: taking measurement seriously.冠状病毒阴谋论信仰、不信任和合规:认真对待测量。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(14):3116-3126. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005164. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England.英格兰的冠状病毒阴谋论信仰、不信任和对政府指导方针的遵守情况。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jan;52(2):251-263. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720001890. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs in the German-speaking general population: endorsement rates and links to reasoning biases and paranoia.德语区普通人群中的新冠病毒阴谋论信念:认同率及其与推理偏差和偏执狂的关联
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 16:1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001124.
4
The Mediating Roles of Medical Mistrust, Knowledge, Confidence and Complacency of Vaccines in the Pathways from Conspiracy Beliefs to Vaccine Hesitancy.医疗不信任、疫苗知识、信心及自满情绪在从阴谋论信念到疫苗犹豫的路径中的中介作用
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;9(11):1342. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111342.
5
Mistrust and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Differently Mediate the Effects of Psychological Factors on Propensity for COVID-19 Vaccine.对阴谋论的不信任和信念对心理因素影响新冠疫苗接种倾向的作用存在不同的中介效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 7;12:683684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683684. eCollection 2021.
6
Adherence to safety and self-isolation guidelines, conspiracy and paranoia-like beliefs during COVID-19 pandemic in Poland - associations and moderators.波兰 COVID-19 大流行期间对安全和自我隔离准则的坚持、阴谋论和类似偏执的信念——关联和调节因素。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113540. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113540. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms.阴谋论:进化功能与心理机制。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Nov;13(6):770-788. doi: 10.1177/1745691618774270. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
8
Why are beliefs in different conspiracy theories positively correlated across individuals? Testing monological network versus unidimensional factor model explanations.为什么不同阴谋论信仰在个体间呈正相关?检验独白网络与单维因素模型解释。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;61(3):1011-1031. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12518. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
9
Relations of familiarity with reasoning strategies in conspiracy beliefs.在阴谋论信念中,对推理策略的熟悉程度之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2010 Oct;107(2):593-602. doi: 10.2466/07.09.17.PR0.107.5.593-602.
10
The concomitants of conspiracy concerns.阴谋论担忧的相关因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 May;52(5):595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1354-4. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
How perceived coercion polarizes unvaccinated people: The mediating role of conspiracy beliefs.感知到的强制如何使未接种疫苗的人两极分化:阴谋论信念的中介作用。
J Health Psychol. 2025 Aug;30(9):2354-2367. doi: 10.1177/13591053241238126. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
2
Trust and vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-national analysis.新冠疫情期间的信任与疫苗犹豫:一项跨国分析。
Vaccine X. 2023 Aug;14:100299. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100299. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Trust in and Use of COVID-19 Information Sources Differs by Health Literacy among College Students.
大学生对新冠疫情信息来源的信任度和使用情况因健康素养而异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;11(6):831. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060831.
4
Contemporary trends in psychological research on conspiracy beliefs. A systematic review.关于阴谋论信念的心理学研究的当代趋势。一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1075779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1075779. eCollection 2023.
5
Summarising data and factors associated with COVID-19 related conspiracy theories in the first year of the pandemic: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.总结大流行第一年与 COVID-19 相关阴谋论相关的数据和因素:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 1;10(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00959-6.
6
Public policy and conspiracies: The case of mandates.公共政策与阴谋论:以强制接种令为例。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Oct;47:101427. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101427. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
7
Multi-dimensional impacts of Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on Sustainable Development Goal achievement.2019 年冠状病毒病大流行对可持续发展目标实现的多维影响。
Global Health. 2022 Jun 27;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00861-1.
8
Shining a spotlight on the dangerous consequences of conspiracy theories.聚焦阴谋论的危险后果。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Oct;47:101363. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101363. Epub 2022 May 28.
9
COVID-19 and 5G conspiracy theories: long term observation of a digital wildfire.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:一场数字野火的长期观察
Int J Data Sci Anal. 2023;15(3):329-346. doi: 10.1007/s41060-022-00322-3. Epub 2022 May 27.
10
The relation between conspiracism, government trust, and COVID-19 vaccination intentions: The key role of motivation.阴谋论、政府信任与 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的关系:动机的关键作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114926. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114926. Epub 2022 Mar 17.